World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
108
Citations
37917
World Ranking
6056
National Ranking
3240

Jay A. Nadel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay A. Nadel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 484 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jay A. Nadel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay A. Nadel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay A. Nadel is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States, focusing primarily on the field of Medicine with a specialization in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine as well as Physiology.

Their research spans multiple aspects of respiratory health, concentrating on chronic respiratory conditions and mechanisms of respiratory support. Key topics covered in their work include:

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research

Nadel's recent publications reflect this focus, including studies on obstructive lung diseases and respiratory function assessment. Notable papers include:

  • "Normal Routine Spirometry Can Mask COPD/Emphysema in Symptomatic Smokers," 2020, published in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Journal of the COPD Foundation
  • "Asthma and emphysema overlap in nonsmokers," 2020, published in Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology
  • "Isolated abnormal FEF75% detects unsuspected bronchiolar obstruction in CF children," 2023, published in Pediatric Research

Their research has been disseminated across several publication venues, notably:

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Journal of the COPD Foundation
  • Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology
  • Pediatric Research

Frequent collaborators include Arthur F. Gelb, Alfred Yamamoto, Eric Verbeken, Donald P. Tashkin, and James C. Hogg, indicating engagement with a network of researchers specializing in respiratory and pulmonary medicine.

Best Publications

  • Textbook of Respiratory Medicine

    [edited by] John F. Murray;Jay A. Nadel

  • Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in normal subjects after upper respiratory tract infection.

    D. W. Empey;L. A. Laitinen;L. Jacobs;W. M. Gold

  • Epidermal growth factor system regulates mucin production in airways

    Kiyoshi Takeyama;Karim Dabbagh;Heung-Man Lee;Carlos Agustí

  • IL-4 Induces Mucin Gene Expression and Goblet Cell Metaplasia In Vitro and In Vivo

    Karim Dabbagh;Kiyoshi Takeyama;Heung-Man Lee;Iris F. Ueki

  • Effect of a previous deep inspiration on airway resistance in man

    Jay A. Nadel;Donald F. Tierney

  • O3-induced change in bronchial reactivity to methacholine and airway inflammation in humans

    J. Seltzer;B. G. Bigby;M. Stulbarg;M. J. Holtzman

  • Importance of airway inflammation for hyperresponsiveness induced by ozone.

    M. J. Holtzman;Leonardo Fabbri;P. M. O'Byrne;B. D. Gold

  • Oxidative Stress Causes Mucin Synthesis Via Transactivation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Role of Neutrophils

    Kiyoshi Takeyama;Karim Dabbagh;Jae Jeong Shim;Trang Dao-Pick

  • Substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide degradation by mast cell tryptase and chymase.

    G H Caughey;F Leidig;N F Viro;J A Nadel

  • Activation of epidermal growth factor receptors is responsible for mucin synthesis induced by cigarette smoke.

    Kiyoshi Takeyama;Birgit Jung;Jae Jeong Shim;Pierre Regis Burgel

  • Transcriptional activation of mucin by Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide in the pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis lung disease

    Jian-Dong Li;Austin F. Dohrman;Marianne Gallup;Susumu Miyata

  • Dual Oxidase 1-dependent MUC5AC Mucin Expression in Cultured Human Airway Epithelial Cells

    Matt X. G. Shao;Jay A. Nadel

  • Predominant generation of 15-lipoxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid by epithelial cells from human trachea.

    J A Hunter;W E Finkbeiner;J A Nadel;E J Goetzl

  • IL-13 induces mucin production by stimulating epidermal growth factor receptors and by activating neutrophils

    Jae Jeong Shim;Karim Dabbagh;Iris F. Ueki;Trang Dao-Pick

  • Roles of epidermal growth factor receptor activation in epithelial cell repair and mucin production in airway epithelium

    Burgel Pr;Nadel Ja

  • Mechanism of bronchoconstriction during inhalation of sulfur dioxide

    J. A. Nadel;H. Salem;B. Tamplin;Y. Tokiwa

  • Cigarette smoke induces MUC5AC mucin overproduction via tumor necrosis factor-α-converting enzyme in human airway epithelial (NCI-H292) cells

    Matt X. G. Shao;Takashi Nakanaga;Jay A. Nadel

  • Autonomic Regulation of the Airways

    J A Nadel;P J Barnes

  • Bronchial hyperirritability in healthy subjects after exposure to ozone.

    J A Golden;J A Nadel;H A Boushey

  • Effect of ozone on bronchial reactivity in atopic and nonatopic subjects.

    Michael J. Holtzman;Joseph H. Cunningham;James R. Sheller;Gernot B. Irsigler

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierangelo Geppetti
Pierangelo Geppetti University of Florence
Homer A. Boushey
Homer A. Boushey University of California, San Francisco
Carol Basbaum
Carol Basbaum University of California, San Francisco
Jonathan Widdicombe
Jonathan Widdicombe University of California, Davis
Donald M. McDonald
Donald M. McDonald University of California, San Francisco
Peter J. Barnes
Peter J. Barnes Imperial College London
George H. Caughey
George H. Caughey University of California, San Francisco
Dean Sheppard
Dean Sheppard University of California, San Francisco
Kian Fan Chung
Kian Fan Chung Imperial College London
George D. Leikauf
George D. Leikauf University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but exploring flexible pathways, online degrees offer diverse options. If you’re a registered nurse looking to advance your education affordably, consider some of the cheapest online bsn programs. These programs provide a budget-friendly route for furthering your nursing career while balancing work and studies.

If you have a non-nursing background, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses allow you to transition into advanced nursing roles efficiently. These accelerated degrees are designed to quickly prepare graduates for the demands of the healthcare field.

Those seeking accessible entry points should explore what is the easiest nursing school to get into. These schools can be an excellent starting place for launching a healthcare career with fewer admission barriers.

Not all healthcare careers require hands-on clinical work. Allied health programs, like medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid, provide critical administrative training and offer financial support, making them accessible to more students.

Best Scientists Citing Jay A. Nadel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles