World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
156
Citations
80800
World Ranking
922
National Ranking
524

Richard C. Boucher publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Boucher sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 675 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard C. Boucher D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Boucher sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 156 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in United States Leader Award

Overview

Richard C. Boucher is a researcher affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a significant focus on subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Physiology, and Epidemiology.

Their recent scientific contributions include five notable papers published between 2020 and 2021. These papers cover important topics related to respiratory diseases and viral infections:

  • SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Genetics Reveals a Variable Infection Gradient in the Respiratory Tract (2020, Cell)
  • SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant exhibits efficient replication ex vivo and transmission in vivo (2020, Science)
  • SARS-CoV-2 infection of the oral cavity and saliva (2021, Nature Medicine)
  • A Mouse-Adapted SARS-CoV-2 Induces Acute Lung Injury and Mortality in Standard Laboratory Mice (2020, Cell)
  • Human Lung Stem Cell-Based Alveolospheres Provide Insights into SARS-CoV-2-Mediated Interferon Responses and Pneumocyte Dysfunction (2020, Cell Stem Cell)

Richard C. Boucher's research topics prominently feature respiratory system health and disease. Main areas of work include:

  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • Pediatric health and respiratory diseases

Throughout their career, Boucher has collaborated frequently with several researchers, indicating a broad network of co-authors. These frequent collaborators include:

  • Wanda K. O'Neal
  • Kenichi Okuda
  • Scott H. Randell
  • Rodney C. Gilmore
  • Ralph S. Baric

The venues chosen for publication reflect Boucher's research emphasis on respiratory and infectious diseases. The most frequent publication platforms are:

  • UNC Libraries
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Cell

Richard C. Boucher's work is embedded in multiple intertwined disciplines that contribute to understanding respiratory health and infectious diseases, with particular attention to viral pathogens affecting the respiratory tract. Their research has been disseminated in journals known for advancing knowledge in medicine and pulmonary sciences, supporting ongoing investigation and clinical insights.

Best Publications

  • SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Genetics Reveals a Variable Infection Gradient in the Respiratory Tract.

    Yixuan J. Hou;Kenichi Okuda;Caitlin E. Edwards;David R. Martinez

  • Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients

    Dieter Worlitzsch;Robert Tarran;Martina Ulrich;Ute Schwab

  • Mucus clearance as a primary innate defense mechanism for mammalian airways

    Michael R. Knowles;Richard C. Boucher

  • Evidence for Periciliary Liquid Layer Depletion, Not Abnormal Ion Composition, in the Pathogenesis of Cystic Fibrosis Airways Disease

    Hirotoshi Matsui;Barbara R Grubb;Robert Tarran;Scott H Randell

  • CFTR as a cAMP-dependent regulator of sodium channels.

    MJ Stutts;CM Canessa;JC Olsen;M Hamrick

  • An Animal Model for Cystic Fibrosis Made by Gene Targeting

    John N. Snouwaert;Kristen K. Brigman;Anne M. Latour;Nadia N. Malouf

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Non-invasive airway health assessment: Synchrotron imaging reveals effects of rehydrating treatments on mucociliary transit in-vivo

    Martin Donnelley;Kaye S. Morgan;Karen K. W. Siu;Nigel R. Farrow

  • Increased airway epithelial Na+ absorption produces cystic fibrosis-like lung disease in mice.

    Marcus Mall;Barbara R Grubb;Jack R Harkema;Wanda K O'Neal

  • Early death due to defective neonatal lung liquid clearance in alpha-ENaC-deficient mice

    Edith Hummler;Pierre Barker;John Gatzy;Friedrich Beermann

  • SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant exhibits efficient replication ex vivo and transmission in vivo

    Yixuan J. Hou;Shiho Chiba;Peter Halfmann;Camille Ehre

  • Mucus clearance and lung function in cystic fibrosis with hypertonic saline.

    Scott H. Donaldson;William D. Bennett;Kirby L. Zeman;Michael R. Knowles

  • Muc5b is required for airway defence

    Michelle G. Roy;Alessandra Livraghi-Butrico;Ashley A. Fletcher;Melissa M. McElwee

  • A Periciliary Brush Promotes the Lung Health by Separating the Mucus Layer from Airway Epithelia

    Brian Button;Li Heng Cai;Camille Ehre;Mehmet Kesimer

  • New concepts of the pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis lung disease.

    Boucher Rc

  • Submucosal glands are the predominant site of CFTR expression in the human bronchus.

    John F. Engelhardt;James R. Yankaskas;Stephen A. Ernst;Yiping Yang

  • Expression of the human multidrug resistance cDNA in insect cells generates a high activity drug-stimulated membrane ATPase.

    Balazs Sarkadi;Elmer M. Price;Richard C. Boucher;Ursula A. Germann

  • Increased Bioelectric Potential Difference across Respiratory Epithelia in Cystic Fibrosis

    Michael R Knowles;John Gatzy;Richard C Boucher

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa Anaerobic Respiration in Biofilms: Relationships to Cystic Fibrosis Pathogenesis

    Sang Sun Yoon;Robert F. Hennigan;George M. Hilliard;Urs A. Ochsner

  • A controlled study of adenoviral-vector-mediated gene transfer in the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis

    Michael R Knowles;Kathy W. Hohneker;Zhaoqing Zhou;John C. Olsen

  • Na+ transport in cystic fibrosis respiratory epithelia. Abnormal basal rate and response to adenylate cyclase activation.

    R C Boucher;M J Stutts;M R Knowles;L Cantley

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Knowles
Michael R. Knowles University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Wanda K. O'Neal
Wanda K. O'Neal University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Eduardo R. Lazarowski
Eduardo R. Lazarowski University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Scott H. Randell
Scott H. Randell University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John C. Olsen
John C. Olsen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert Tarran
Robert Tarran University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Michael M. Tunney
Michael M. Tunney Queen's University Belfast
Marcus A. Mall
Marcus A. Mall Charité - University Medicine Berlin
M. Jackson Stutts
M. Jackson Stutts University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Matthew C. Wolfgang
Matthew C. Wolfgang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are several online degree options and accelerated career pathways to explore. Rapid advancement in healthcare education means students can find flexible programs that fit varying schedules—many with fast-tracked curriculums to quickly enter the workforce or advance in your current role.

For those interested in advanced nursing, the shortest dnp program online can help nurses achieve a doctoral degree in less time, while still maintaining work-life balance. Some programs focus on convenience and offer accelerated options—discover more about these by checking out different dnp programs tailored for busy professionals.

If you’re looking to start your nursing career sooner, an lpn accelerated program can provide a fast entry point into healthcare, often leading to immediate employment opportunities. Additionally, mental health is a growing field—accelerated online programs, like the accelerated msn psychiatric np programs, allow you to specialize quickly and meet the rising demand for qualified professionals.

By exploring these online and accelerated pathways, you can take important steps toward a rewarding healthcare career on your terms.

Best Scientists Citing Richard C. Boucher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles