World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
C. David Whiteman

C. David Whiteman

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
8501
World Ranking
5784
National Ranking
2103

C. David Whiteman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. David Whiteman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

C. David Whiteman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. David Whiteman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. David Whiteman is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States and focuses their research on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their work encompasses multiple related subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, and Earth-Surface Processes.

The main topics covered in their research include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Wind and Air Flow Studies, Aeolian processes and effects, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Tree-ring climate responses. These topics illustrate a broad engagement with processes affecting the atmosphere and environment, as well as their interactions with terrestrial systems.

The scientist has contributed to publications in journals such as Boundary-Layer Meteorology and the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. Two recent papers authored by Ricardo C. Muñoz, with whom Whiteman frequently collaborates, demonstrate this research focus:

  • Using Commercial Aircraft Meteorological Data to Assess the Heat Budget of the Convective Boundary Layer Over the Santiago Valley in Central Chile, 2022, Boundary-Layer Meteorology
  • Raco Wind at the Exit of the Maipo Canyon in Central Chile: Climatology, Special Observations, and Possible Mechanisms, 2020, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

Whiteman's frequent co-authors include Ricardo C. Muñoz, René Garreaud, José A. Rutllant, J. Marc Hidalgo, and Laurence Armi. These collaborations indicate a network of researchers active in atmospheric and environmental sciences, with overlapping research interests related to meteorology and climatology.

Best Publications

  • Mountain Meteorology: Fundamentals and Applications

    C. David Whiteman

  • Observations of Thermally Developed Wind Systems in Mountainous Terrain

    C. David Whiteman

  • Low-Level Jet Climatology from Enhanced Rawinsonde Observations at a Site in the Southern Great Plains

    C. David Whiteman;Xindi Bian;Shiyuan Zhong

  • Breakup of Temperature Inversions in Deep Mountain Valleys: Part I. Observations.

    C. David Whiteman

  • The Relationship between Overlying Synoptic-Scale Flows and Winds within a Valley

    C. David Whiteman;J. Christopher Doran

  • Diurnal Mountain Wind Systems

    Dino Zardi;C. David Whiteman

  • The Persistent Cold-Air Pool Study

    Neil P. Lareau;Erik Crosman;C. David Whiteman;John D. Horel

  • Relationship between particulate air pollution and meteorological variables in Utah's Salt Lake Valley

    C. David Whiteman;Sebastian W. Hoch;John D. Horel;Allison Charland

  • Cold Air Pool Structure and Evolution in a Mountain Basin: Peter Sinks, Utah

    Craig B. Clements;C. David Whiteman;John D. Horel

  • Cold pools in the Columbia Basin

    Charles D. Whiteman;Shiyuan Zhong;William J. Shaw;John M. Hubbe

  • Wintertime Evolution of the Temperature Inversion in the Colorado Plateau Basin

    C. David Whiteman;Xindi Bian;Shiyuan Zhong

  • The terrain-induced rotor experiment: A field campaign overview including observational highlights

    Vanda Grubišić;James D. Doyle;Joachim Kuettner;Stephen Mobbs

  • Wintertime PM2.5 concentrations during persistent, multi-day cold-air pools in a mountain valley

    Geoffrey D. Silcox;Kerry E. Kelly;Erik T. Crosman;C. David Whiteman

  • Single-station integral measures of atmospheric stagnation, recirculation and ventilation

    K.Jerry Allwine;C.David Whiteman

  • The IMADA-AVER Boundary Layer Experiment in the Mexico City Area

    J. C. Doran;S. Abbott;J. Archuleta;X. Bian

  • Boundary layer evolution and regional‐scale diurnal circulations over the and Mexican plateau

    C. D. Whiteman;S. Zhong;X. Bian;J. D. Fast

  • Breakup of Temperature Inversions in Deep Mountain Valleys: Part II. Thermodynamic Model

    C. David Whiteman;Thomas B. McKee

  • Coupling between Chemical and Meteorological Processes under Persistent Cold-Air Pool Conditions: Evolution of Wintertime PM2.5 Pollution Events and N2O5 Observations in Utah's Salt Lake Valley.

    Munkhbayar Baasandorj;Sebastian W. Hoch;Ryan Bares;John C. Lin

  • METCRAX 2006 Meteorological Experiments in Arizona's Meteor Crater

    C. David Whiteman

  • Evaluation of an Inexpensive Temperature Datalogger for Meteorological Applications

    Charles D. Whiteman;John M. Hubbe;William J. Shaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Shiyuan Zhong
Shiyuan Zhong Michigan State University
Xindi Bian
Xindi Bian United States Department of Agriculture
Norbert Kalthoff
Norbert Kalthoff Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Jerome D. Fast
Jerome D. Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Albert A. M. Holtslag
Albert A. M. Holtslag Wageningen University & Research
Harindra J. S. Fernando
Harindra J. S. Fernando University of Notre Dame
William P. Dubé
William P. Dubé Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Steven S. Brown
Steven S. Brown National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Richard Rotunno
Richard Rotunno National Center for Atmospheric Research
James D. Doyle
James D. Doyle United States Naval Research Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary study options. For those interested in a broader approach, an online general studies degree affordable program can provide foundational knowledge and flexibility, allowing students to tailor courses toward environmental topics alongside other interests.

Students aiming to advance in research or policy may find pursuing the cheapest dsw program appealing. Although traditionally focused on social work, the skills gained can complement environmental advocacy and community work related to sustainability and public health.

For those looking to enter the workforce quickly, choosing one of the easiest degree to get options might be strategic, especially if the goal is to build basic environmental literacy and practical skills that support entry-level environmental roles.

Specialized degrees like online geology degrees are highly relevant to Environmental Sciences. They provide in-depth understanding of earth systems, which is essential for careers in environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation.

Best Scientists Citing C. David Whiteman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles