World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernhard Dahme

Bernhard Dahme

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
5149
World Ranking
9241
National Ranking
438

Bernhard Dahme publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Dahme sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bernhard Dahme D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Dahme sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernhard Dahme is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany and has contributed to the field of Psychology, focusing primarily on General Psychology. Their research interests concentrate on Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology.

Dahme has published in the journal Psychologische Rundschau. The most recent paper is titled "Nachruf auf Kurt Pawlik (16. 3. 1934 - 14. 8. 2022)", published in 2022.

  • Nachruf auf Kurt Pawlik (16. 3. 1934 - 14. 8. 2022), 2022, Psychologische Rundschau

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Frank Rösler
  • Brigitte Röder

Dahme's work appears exclusively within the domain of psychology, with a particular emphasis on the historical and academic aspects of the discipline.

Best Publications

  • The effectiveness of relaxation training in reducing treatment-related symptoms and improving emotional adjustment in acute non-surgical cancer treatment: a meta-analytical review.

    Karin Luebbert;Bernhard Dahme;Monika Hasenbring

  • The unpleasantness of perceived dyspnea is processed in the anterior insula and amygdala.

    Andreas von Leupoldt;Tobias Sommer;Sarah Kegat;Hans Jörg Baumann

  • Self-injurious behavior in women with eating disorders.

    Thomas Paul;Kirsten Schroeter;Bernhard Dahme;Detlev O. Nutzinger

  • Dyspnea and pain share emotion-related brain network

    Andreas von Leupoldt;Tobias Sommer;Sarah Kegat;Hans Jörg Baumann

  • Association of depression and anxiety with health care use and quality of life in asthma patients.

    Antje Kullowatz;Frank Kanniess;Bernhard Dahme;Helgo Magnussen

  • Cortical Substrates for the Perception of Dyspnea

    Andreas von Leupoldt;Bernhard Dahme

  • Specificity of cognitive biases in patients with current depression and remitted depression and in patients with asthma.

    A. Fritzsche;B. Dahme;I. H. Gotlib;J. Joormann

  • Implementation and interpretation of respiratory sinus arrhythmia measures in psychosomatic medicine: practice against better evidence?

    Thomas Ritz;Bernhard Dahme

  • A short goal-pursuit intervention to improve physical capacity: A randomized clinical trial in chronic back pain patients

    Sandra Christiansen;Gabriele Oettingen;Bernhard Dahme;Regine Klinger

  • Specificity of self‐concept disturbances in eating disorders

    Corinna Jacobi;Thomas Paul;Martina de Zwaan;Detlef O. Nutzinger

  • Psychological aspects in the perception of dyspnea in obstructive pulmonary diseases.

    Andreas von Leupoldt;Bernhard Dahme

  • The impact of emotions on the sensory and affective dimension of perceived dyspnea

    Andreas von Leupoldt;Corinna Mertz;Sarah Kegat;Swantje Burmester

  • Guidelines for mechanical lung function measurements in psychophysiology

    Thomas Ritz;Bernhard Dahme;Arthur B Dubois;Hans Folgering

  • Down-regulation of insular cortex responses to dyspnea and pain in asthma

    Andreas von Leupoldt;Tobias Sommer;Sarah Kegat;Falk Eippert

  • Differentiation Between the Sensory and Affective Dimension of Dyspnea During Resistive Load Breathing in Normal Subjects

    Andreas von Leupoldt;Bernhard Dahme

  • Airways, Respiration, and Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia During Picture Viewing

    Thomas Ritz;Thomas Ritz;Miriam Thöns;Saskia Fahrenkrug;Bernhard Dahme

  • Stress effects on lung function in asthma are mediated by changes in airway inflammation.

    Antje Kullowatz;David Rosenfield;Bernhard Dahme;Helgo Magnussen

  • Reduced Perception of Dyspnea and Pain after Right Insular Cortex Lesions

    Daniela Schön;Michael Rosenkranz;Jan Regelsberger;Bernhard Dahme

  • Distractive auditory stimuli reduce the unpleasantness of dyspnea during exercise in patients with COPD

    Andreas von Leupoldt;Karin Taube;Stephan Schubert-Heukeshoven;Helgo Magnussen

  • Films for eliciting emotional states in children.

    Andreas von Leupoldt;Jenny Rohde;Anna Beregova;Imke Thordsen-Sörensen

  • Body image in eating disorders and analysis of its relevance: a preliminary study.

    Fernando Fernández-Aranda;Bernhard Dahme;Rolf Meermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Tobias Sommer
Tobias Sommer Universität Hamburg
Christian Büchel
Christian Büchel University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Andrew Steptoe
Andrew Steptoe University College London
Walton T. Roth
Walton T. Roth Stanford University
Ian H. Gotlib
Ian H. Gotlib Stanford University
Jutta Joormann
Jutta Joormann Yale University
Josep M. Argilés
Josep M. Argilés University of Barcelona
Michael Tamm
Michael Tamm University Hospital of Basel
Josep Roca
Josep Roca University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and specialized career paths. For those interested in behavior analysis, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a prominent route. Each location in the U.S. may have specific educational and certification requirements for aspiring BCBAs.

For instance, the Virginia Beach bcba requirements highlight essential steps including accredited coursework and supervised fieldwork. If you are considering options in the capital, becoming a bcba in Washington DC involves understanding both national and regional expectations for licensure.

Other regions, such as Wichita, also have detailed processes—see the Wichita bcba education requirements for specifics about graduate study and examination standards. Similarly, the Winston Salem bcba education requirements demonstrate the need for thorough academic preparation combined with hands-on clinical experience.

Carefully reviewing regional guidelines ensures you are on the right track for not only meeting academic requirements, but also securing a fulfilling role in the field of psychology or behavior analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Bernhard Dahme

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles