World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
13931
World Ranking
3000
National Ranking
1719

David Rosenfield publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Rosenfield sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 225 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Rosenfield D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Rosenfield sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Rosenfield is affiliated with Southern Methodist University in the United States. Their academic work is situated primarily within the field of Psychology, with significant contributions to Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Additional involvement in Physiology, Applied Psychology, and Social Psychology reflects a broad interdisciplinary approach.

Rosenfield's recent scholarly output includes publications focusing on mental health, treatment methodologies, and psychological processes. Notable recent papers include:

  • Positive affect treatment targets reward sensitivity: A randomized controlled trial, 2023, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Efficacy of Yoga vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Stress Education for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Cognitive biases in perceptions of posttraumatic growth: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Clinical Psychology Review
  • Dose Timing of D-Cycloserine to Augment Exposure Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • The effects of a prolonged exposure workshop with and without consultation on provider and patient outcomes: a randomized implementation trial, 2020, Implementation Science

The main topics addressed in Rosenfield's research encompass a range of psychological and mental health concerns, including:

  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Frequent co-authors in Rosenfield's body of work are as follows:

  • Jasper A. J. Smits
  • Thomas Ritz
  • Michael W. Otto
  • Stefan G. Hofmann
  • Michael J. Zvolensky

Rosenfield has published regularly in several peer-reviewed venues, with multiple contributions to these journals:

  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Best Publications

  • Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria

    Amanda G. Loerinc;Alicia E. Meuret;Michael P. Twohig;David Rosenfield

  • Effects of "Voice" and Peer Opinions on Responses to Inequity

    Robert Folger;David Rosenfield;Janet Grove;Louise Corkran

  • Reducing anxiety sensitivity with exercise.

    Jasper A.J. Smits;Angela C. Berry;David Rosenfield;Mark B. Powers

  • Children's exposure to intimate partner violence: a meta-analysis of longitudinal associations with child adjustment problems

    Nicole L. Vu;Ernest N. Jouriles;Renee McDonald;David Rosenfield

  • Positive affect treatment for depression and anxiety: A randomized clinical trial for a core feature of anhedonia.

    Michelle G Craske;Alicia E Meuret;Thomas Ritz;Michael Treanor

  • Effect of Prolonged Exposure Therapy Delivered Over 2 Weeks vs 8 Weeks vs Present-Centered Therapy on PTSD Symptom Severity in Military Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Edna B. Foa;Carmen P. McLean;Carmen P. McLean;Yinyin Zang;David Rosenfield

  • Egotism and attribution.

    Melvin L. Snyder;Walter G. Stephan;David Rosenfield

  • Relative deprivation and procedural justifications

    Robert Folger;David D. Rosenfield;Thomas Robinson

  • Moderators and non-specific predictors of treatment outcome for anxiety disorders: A comparison of cognitive behavioral therapy to acceptance and commitment therapy.

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Joanna J. Arch;David Rosenfield;Michelle G. Craske

  • D-Cycloserine Augmentation of Exposure-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.

    David Mataix-Cols;Lorena Fernández de la Cruz;Benedetta Monzani;David Rosenfield

  • Threat reappraisal as a mediator of symptom change in cognitive-behavioral treatment of anxiety disorders: A systematic review.

    Jasper A. J. Smits;Kristin Julian;David Rosenfield;Mark B. Powers

  • Effects of a Parenting Intervention on Features of Psychopathy in Children

    Renee McDonald;Mary Catherine Dodson;David Rosenfield;Ernest N. Jouriles

  • Prolonged Exposure vs Supportive Counseling for Sexual Abuse–Related PTSD in Adolescent Girls: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Edna B. Foa;Carmen P. McLean;Sandra Capaldi;David Rosenfield

  • Performance in the Interdependent Classroom: A Field Study

    G. William Lucker;David Rosenfield;Jev Sikes;Elliot Aronson

  • When rewards reflect competence: A qualification of the overjustification effect.

    David Rosenfield;Robert Folger;Harold F. Adelman

  • Reducing conduct problems among children exposed to intimate partner violence: a randomized clinical trial examining effects of Project Support

    Ernest N. Jouriles;Renee McDonald;David Rosenfield;Nanette S Stephens

  • Respiratory and cognitive mediators of treatment change in panic disorder: evidence for intervention specificity.

    Alicia E. Meuret;David Rosenfield;Anke Seidel;Lavanya Bhaskara

  • Preliminary evidence for cognitive mediation during cognitive-behavioral therapy of panic disorder.

    Stefan G. Hofmann;Alicia E. Meuret;David Rosenfield;Michael K. Suvak

  • An initial waitlist-controlled trial of the unified protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders in adolescents.

    Jill Ehrenreich-May;David Rosenfield;Alexander H. Queen;Sarah M. Kennedy

  • Cognitive mechanisms of social anxiety reduction: an examination of specificity and temporality.

    Jasper A. J. Smits;David Rosenfield;Renee McDonald;Michael J. Telch

  • D-cycloserine enhancement of fear extinction is specific to successful exposure sessions: evidence from the treatment of height phobia.

    Jasper A.J. Smits;David Rosenfield;Michael W. Otto;Mark B. Powers

Frequent Co-Authors

Jasper A. J. Smits
Jasper A. J. Smits The University of Texas at Austin
Renee McDonald
Renee McDonald Southern Methodist University
Ernest N. Jouriles
Ernest N. Jouriles Southern Methodist University
Michael J. Zvolensky
Michael J. Zvolensky University of Houston
Mark B. Powers
Mark B. Powers Baylor University Medical Center
Stefan G. Hofmann
Stefan G. Hofmann Philipp University of Marburg
Alicia E. Meuret
Alicia E. Meuret Southern Methodist University
Mark H. Pollack
Mark H. Pollack Rush University Medical Center
Walter G. Stephan
Walter G. Stephan New Mexico State University
Edna B. Foa
Edna B. Foa University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying psychology in the USA, there are several online degree options that can open doors to rewarding career pathways. Popular choices include Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Psychology or Counseling, which can lead to specialized roles in mental health services.

Becoming a mental health counselor is a common path for psychology graduates. However, certification and education requirements differ by state and city. For example, Newark mental health counselor certification requirements might vary from mental health counselor requirements in Norfolk. Each location sets its own standards for supervised clinical hours, licensure exams, and continuing education.

Additionally, learning about how to become a mental health counselor in North Las Vegas or exploring Oakland mental health counselor education requirements can help you understand regional differences and tailor your educational journey.

Pursuing an online psychology degree can give you the flexibility to meet these requirements while gaining the knowledge and skills needed to support individuals and communities across various settings.

Best Scientists Citing David Rosenfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles