World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
33258
World Ranking
3045
National Ranking
1730

Robert Folger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Folger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Robert Folger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Folger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Robert Folger is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on social psychology, information systems, sociology and political science, applied psychology, and clinical psychology.

Folger's work touches on several main topics including information and cyber security, cybercrime and law enforcement studies, terrorism, counterterrorism, and political violence, as well as behavioral health and interventions. Further areas of interest include personality traits and psychology, death anxiety and social exclusion, and emotions and moral behavior.

Their recent publications demonstrate a range of interdisciplinary investigations. Key papers include:

  • "An exploratory examination of organizational insiders' descriptive and normative perceptions of cyber-relevant rights and responsibilities" (2020), published in Computers & Security
  • "Disobeying the Leader: Creative Deviance as a Mechanism Between Psychological Ownership and Social Undermining" (2024), published in the Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
  • "New Perspectives on Fostering Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Workplace" (2023), published in the Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "Introducing the Special Issue on 'Social Justice: Lessons Learned and Needed Research'" (2022), published in Social Justice Research
  • "Building a Better Management Science Through Theory Testing and Refinement" (2022), published in the Academy of Management Proceedings

Folger has collaborated frequently with several co-authors throughout their career. These include Steven W. Whiting, Nicholas Connor Andriese, Clay Posey, Jigyashu Shukla, and Rebecca J. Bennett.

Their work has appeared most often in venues such as the Academy of Management Proceedings, Computers & Security, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, and Social Justice Research.

Robert Folger has been recognized as a Dean of Fellow by the Academy of Management. Their contributions focus on advancing psychological understanding within organizational and security-related contexts, intersecting with contemporary social justice topics and management sciences.

Best Publications

  • Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions

    Robert Folger;Mary A. Konovsky

  • RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Robert Folger

  • Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management

    Robert Folger;Russell Cropanzano

  • Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity.

    Robert Folger

  • The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics.

    Ronald F. Piccolo;Rebecca Greenbaum;Deanne N. den Hartog;Robert Folger

  • Fairness theory: Justice as accountability.

    Robert Folger;Russell Cropanzano

  • Personality as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Fairness and Retaliation

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Robert Folger;Paul Tesluk

  • Interactive Effects of Procedural Justice and Outcome Negativity on Victims and Survivors of Job Loss

    Joel Brockner;Mary Konovsky;Rochelle Cooper-Schneider;Robert Folger

  • Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effect in Groups and Organizations

    Jerald Greenberg;Robert Folger

  • Rethinking Equity Theory

    Robert Folger

  • Referent Cognitions and Task Decision Autonomy: Beyond Equity Theory

    Russell Cropanzano;Robert Folger

  • Deontic justice: the role of moral principles in workplace fairness

    Russell Cropanzano;Barry Goldman;Robert Folger

  • Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness

    Carmelo Joseph Turillo;Robert Folger;James J Lavelle;Elizabeth E Umphress

  • HRM and service fairness: How being fair with employees spills over to customers

    David E. Bowen;Stephen W. Gilliland;Robert Folger

  • Effects of "Voice" and Peer Opinions on Responses to Inequity

    Robert Folger;David Rosenfield;Janet Grove;Louise Corkran

  • Unfairness and resistance to change: hardship as mistreatment

    Robert Folger;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model.

    Robert Folger

  • Beyond negative affectivity: Measuring stress and satisfaction in the workplace.

    David Watson;James W Pennebaker;Robert Folger

  • Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects

    Robert Folger;Chris Martin

  • Microjustice and Macrojustice

    Philip Brickman;Robert Folger;Erica Goode;Yaacov Schul

  • Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction With Citizen-Police Encounters

    Tom R. Tyler;Robert Folger

  • What Is the Relationship Between Justice and Morality

    Robert Folger;Russell Cropanzano;Barry Goldman

  • Violence and hostility at work: A model of reactions to perceived injustice.

    Robert Folger;Robert A. Baron

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell Cropanzano
Russell Cropanzano University of Colorado Boulder
Daniel P. Skarlicki
Daniel P. Skarlicki University of British Columbia
David Rosenfield
David Rosenfield Southern Methodist University
Maureen L. Ambrose
Maureen L. Ambrose University of Central Florida
Joel Brockner
Joel Brockner Columbia University
Gary P. Latham
Gary P. Latham University of Toronto
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University
Marshall Schminke
Marshall Schminke University of Central Florida
Chester A. Insko
Chester A. Insko University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and rewarding career paths in mental health and human services. Many students and working professionals seek flexible, affordable programs that fit their needs and budgets—especially as demand grows for qualified experts across the country.

For those interested in advanced leadership roles, an affordable psyd in behavioral health leadership can help you gain specialized expertise in behavioral health systems and policy. If your passion lies in community outreach and support, a cheap human services degree online may be a practical and cost-effective way to start or advance your career.

Those fascinated by the intersection of psychology and law might consider enrolling in inexpensive forensic psychology master's programs, preparing you for roles in criminal justice, corrections, or legal consulting. Meanwhile, an affordable online masters in psychology offers a solid foundation for various clinical, research, and educational opportunities.

These flexible, budget-conscious online programs can help you pursue your passion, upgrade your skills, or shift your career focus—often while continuing to work or manage other responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Folger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles