World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3043 2800 1730 1556 139 33258

Robert Folger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert Folger between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert Folger published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1988. 3 of the 217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1988. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1974 2025

217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert Folger: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 2
1976 0
1977 4
1978 3
1979 2
1980 3
1981 1
1982 2
1983 4
1984 6
1985 1
1986 2
1987 5
1988 10
1989 7
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 5
1994 4
1995 3
1996 3
1997 2
1998 9
1999 8
2000 1
2001 3
2002 3
2003 8
2004 6
2005 6
2006 2
2007 2
2008 5
2009 4
2010 7
2011 6
2012 7
2013 5
2014 8
2015 10
2016 7
2017 8
2018 3
2019 6
2020 7
2021 2
2022 3
2023 3
2024 2
2025 1
Total 217
Download as CSV

Robert Folger publications per year - data summary

  • Robert Folger, a Psychology scholar from University of Central Florida, has 217 publications recorded across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1974 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 1988 and 2015, with 10 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1974, 1981, 1985, 1990 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 52 years in the span carries no publications at all (1976).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.3 per year counting only the 51 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 11 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1974-1991: 56 publications (3.1 per year); 1992-2009: 76 publications (4.2 per year); 2010-2025: 85 publications (5.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Robert Folger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Folger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 139
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert Folger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Robert Folger, a Psychology scholar from University of Central Florida, records 139 publications - the 43rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 43% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Robert Folger, and about 57% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Robert Folger ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Robert Folger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Folger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Robert Folger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Robert Folger, a Psychology scholar from University of Central Florida, records 63 D-Index - the 73rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 73% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Robert Folger, and about 27% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Robert Folger ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Robert Folger is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on social psychology, information systems, sociology and political science, applied psychology, and clinical psychology.

Folger's work touches on several main topics including information and cyber security, cybercrime and law enforcement studies, terrorism, counterterrorism, and political violence, as well as behavioral health and interventions. Further areas of interest include personality traits and psychology, death anxiety and social exclusion, and emotions and moral behavior.

Their recent publications demonstrate a range of interdisciplinary investigations. Key papers include:

  • "An exploratory examination of organizational insiders' descriptive and normative perceptions of cyber-relevant rights and responsibilities" (2020), published in Computers & Security
  • "Disobeying the Leader: Creative Deviance as a Mechanism Between Psychological Ownership and Social Undermining" (2024), published in the Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
  • "New Perspectives on Fostering Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Workplace" (2023), published in the Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "Introducing the Special Issue on 'Social Justice: Lessons Learned and Needed Research'" (2022), published in Social Justice Research
  • "Building a Better Management Science Through Theory Testing and Refinement" (2022), published in the Academy of Management Proceedings

Folger has collaborated frequently with several co-authors throughout their career. These include Steven W. Whiting, Nicholas Connor Andriese, Clay Posey, Jigyashu Shukla, and Rebecca J. Bennett.

Their work has appeared most often in venues such as the Academy of Management Proceedings, Computers & Security, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, and Social Justice Research.

Robert Folger has been recognized as a Dean of Fellow by the Academy of Management. Their contributions focus on advancing psychological understanding within organizational and security-related contexts, intersecting with contemporary social justice topics and management sciences.

Best Publications

  • Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions

    Robert Folger;Mary A. Konovsky

  • RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Robert Folger

  • Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management

    Robert Folger;Russell Cropanzano

  • Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity.

    Robert Folger

  • The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics.

    Ronald F. Piccolo;Rebecca Greenbaum;Deanne N. den Hartog;Robert Folger

  • Fairness theory: Justice as accountability.

    Robert Folger;Russell Cropanzano

  • Personality as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Fairness and Retaliation

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Robert Folger;Paul Tesluk

  • Interactive Effects of Procedural Justice and Outcome Negativity on Victims and Survivors of Job Loss

    Joel Brockner;Mary Konovsky;Rochelle Cooper-Schneider;Robert Folger

  • Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effect in Groups and Organizations

    Jerald Greenberg;Robert Folger

  • Rethinking Equity Theory

    Robert Folger

  • Referent Cognitions and Task Decision Autonomy: Beyond Equity Theory

    Russell Cropanzano;Robert Folger

  • Deontic justice: the role of moral principles in workplace fairness

    Russell Cropanzano;Barry Goldman;Robert Folger

  • Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness

    Carmelo Joseph Turillo;Robert Folger;James J Lavelle;Elizabeth E Umphress

  • HRM and service fairness: How being fair with employees spills over to customers

    David E. Bowen;Stephen W. Gilliland;Robert Folger

  • Effects of "Voice" and Peer Opinions on Responses to Inequity

    Robert Folger;David Rosenfield;Janet Grove;Louise Corkran

  • Unfairness and resistance to change: hardship as mistreatment

    Robert Folger;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model.

    Robert Folger

  • Beyond negative affectivity: Measuring stress and satisfaction in the workplace.

    David Watson;James W Pennebaker;Robert Folger

  • Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects

    Robert Folger;Chris Martin

  • Microjustice and Macrojustice

    Philip Brickman;Robert Folger;Erica Goode;Yaacov Schul

  • Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction With Citizen-Police Encounters

    Tom R. Tyler;Robert Folger

  • What Is the Relationship Between Justice and Morality

    Robert Folger;Russell Cropanzano;Barry Goldman

  • Violence and hostility at work: A model of reactions to perceived injustice.

    Robert Folger;Robert A. Baron

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel P. Skarlicki
Daniel P. Skarlicki University of British Columbia
Russell Cropanzano
Russell Cropanzano University of Colorado Boulder
Jerald Greenberg
Jerald Greenberg The Ohio State University
David Rosenfield
David Rosenfield Southern Methodist University
Maureen L. Ambrose
Maureen L. Ambrose University of Central Florida
Robert A. Baron
Robert A. Baron Oklahoma State University
Gary P. Latham
Gary P. Latham University of Toronto
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
Joel Brockner
Joel Brockner Columbia University
Rebecca L. Greenbaum
Rebecca L. Greenbaum Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and rewarding career paths in mental health and human services. Many students and working professionals seek flexible, affordable programs that fit their needs and budgets—especially as demand grows for qualified experts across the country.

For those interested in advanced leadership roles, an affordable psyd in behavioral health leadership can help you gain specialized expertise in behavioral health systems and policy. If your passion lies in community outreach and support, a cheap human services degree online may be a practical and cost-effective way to start or advance your career.

Those fascinated by the intersection of psychology and law might consider enrolling in inexpensive forensic psychology master's programs, preparing you for roles in criminal justice, corrections, or legal consulting. Meanwhile, an affordable online masters in psychology offers a solid foundation for various clinical, research, and educational opportunities.

These flexible, budget-conscious online programs can help you pursue your passion, upgrade your skills, or shift your career focus—often while continuing to work or manage other responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Folger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles