World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
76
Citations
31577
World Ranking
1688
National Ranking
998

Joel Brockner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel Brockner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joel Brockner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel Brockner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1991 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Joel Brockner is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research spans various domains within the social sciences, with a primary focus on social psychology, sociology and political science, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

Their work primarily addresses topics such as job satisfaction and organizational behavior, cultural differences and values, social and intergroup psychology, international student and expatriate challenges, communication in education and healthcare, nonprofit sector and volunteering, and experimental behavioral economics studies.

Joel Brockner has contributed to several publication venues repeatedly, including:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Tailoring the intervention to the self: Congruence between self-affirmation and self-construal mitigates the gender gap in quantitative performance" (2022, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes)
  • "Mistreatment from peers can reduce the effects of respectful treatment from bosses, and respectful peers can offset mistreatment from bosses" (2020, Journal of Organizational Behavior)
  • "Factors affecting supervisors' enactment of interpersonal fairness: The interactive relationship between their managers' informational fairness and supervisors' sense of power" (2020, Journal of Organizational Behavior)
  • "My boss is younger, less educated, and shorter tenured: When and why status (in)congruence influences promotion system justification." (2023, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • "Work engagement and burnout in anticipation of physically returning to work: The interactive effect of imminence of return and self-affirmation" (2023, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Ya-Ru Chen
  • D. Ramona Bobocel
  • Marius van Dijke
  • Richard Crisp
  • Nancy E. Adler

Joel Brockner's research production, totaling at least 14 publications in social sciences, covers nine in social psychology, seven in sociology and political science, and seven in organizational behavior and human resource management. This multidisciplinary approach reflects their engagement across intersecting fields that explore workplace dynamics, social behaviors, and cultural influences.

Among the distinctions received are being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 1991 and a Dean Fellow of the Academy of Management. These recognitions align with their contributions to understanding organizational behavior and interpersonal dynamics within professional settings.

Best Publications

  • An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.

    Joel Brockner;Batia M. Wiesenfeld

  • The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress

    Joel Brockner

  • Self-Esteem at Work: Research, Theory and Practice

    Joel Brockner

  • Value from hedonic experience and engagement.

    E. Tory Higgins

  • Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work

    Joel Brockner;E.Tory Higgins

  • Taking a Multifoci Approach to the Study of Justice, Social Exchange, and Citizenship Behavior: The Target Similarity Model†

    James J. Lavelle;Deborah E. Rupp;Joel Brockner

  • When Trust Matters: The Moderating Effect of Outcome Favorability

    Joel Brockner;Phyllis A. Siegel;Joseph P. Daly;Tom Tyler

  • The Influence of Prior Commitment to an Institution on Reactions to Perceived Unfairness: The Higher They Are, the Harder They Fall

    Joel Brockner;Tom R. Tyler;Rochelle Cooper-Schneider

  • Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice.

    Joel Brockner;Grant Ackerman;Jerald Greenberg;Michele J. Gelfand

  • Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts: A Social Psychological Analysis

    Joel Brockner;Jeffrey Z. Rubin

  • Layoffs, Job Insecurity, And Survivors' Work Effort: Evidence Of An Inverted-U Relationship

    Joel Brockner;Steven Grover;Thomas F. Reed;Rocki Lee Dewitt

  • Interactive Effects of Procedural Justice and Outcome Negativity on Victims and Survivors of Job Loss

    Joel Brockner;Mary Konovsky;Rochelle Cooper-Schneider;Robert Folger

  • Survivors' Reactions to Layoffs: We Get By with a Little Help for Our Friends.

    Joel Brockner;Steven Grover;Thomas Reed;Rocki DeWitt

  • Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process

    Joel Brockner;E.Tory Higgins;Murray B. Low

  • Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust.

    Joel Brockner

  • Managing the Effects of Layoffs on Survivors

    Joel Brockner

  • When it is especially important to explain why: Factors affecting the relationship between managers' explanations of a layoff and survivors' reactions to the layoff

    Joel Brockner;Rocki Lee DeWitt;Steven Grover;Thomas Reed

  • Making Sense of Procedural Fairness: How High Procedural Fairness Can Reduce or Heighten the Influence of Outcome Favorability

    Joel Brockner

  • Layoffs, self-esteem, and survivor guilt: Motivational, affective, and attitudinal consequences

    Joel Brockner;Jeanette Davy;Carolyn Carter

  • The Impact of Layoffs on Survivors: An Organizational Justice Perspective

    Joel Brockner;Jerald Greenberg

  • Commitment, Procedural Fairness, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Multifoci Analysis

    James J. Lavelle;Joel Brockner;Mary A. Konovsky;Kenneth H. Price

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven L. Grover
Steven L. Grover Macquarie University
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
Jerald Greenberg
Jerald Greenberg The Ohio State University
Marius van Dijke
Marius van Dijke Erasmus University Rotterdam
E. Tory Higgins
E. Tory Higgins Columbia University
Robert Folger
Robert Folger University of Central Florida
Michele J. Gelfand
Michele J. Gelfand Stanford University
Daniel R. Ames
Daniel R. Ames Columbia University
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and specialized career pathways. Many students pursue advanced credentials such as Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification, which is in high demand across multiple regions. If you are considering this pathway, it’s important to note that requirements can vary somewhat depending on location.

For instance, if you are interested in practicing in Texas, you can explore the San Antonio bcba education requirements. Those looking at California will find guidance tailored to major cities: the San Diego bcba requirements, the San Francisco bcba requirements, and specific insights on how to become a bcba in San Jose.

Online psychology degrees often offer the flexibility necessary to meet these requirements, including licensure preparation and practicum options. Make sure to research state-specific rules, supervised fieldwork, and the necessary graduate coursework. With the right online program, you can efficiently prepare for a successful career in psychology or behavioral analysis wherever you plan to work.

Best Scientists Citing Joel Brockner

Trending Scientists