World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
17337
World Ranking
5343
National Ranking
358

Daniel P. Skarlicki publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Skarlicki sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Daniel P. Skarlicki D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Skarlicki sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Daniel P. Skarlicki is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research spans several fields, primarily within the social sciences and business management areas.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Business, Management and Accounting

Within these broader fields, their work engages multiple subfields such as:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Safety Research
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The core topics of Skarlicki's research explore areas related to job satisfaction and organizational behavior, social and intergroup psychology, and experimental behavioral economics. Additional notable topics include psychology of moral and emotional judgment, ethics in business and education, mindfulness and compassion interventions, and employment and welfare studies.

The scientist has published regularly in several academic venues. Key publication venues include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Journal of Management
  • Journal of Business Ethics
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior

Noteworthy recent papers authored or coauthored by Skarlicki include:

  • "Cultivating a conflict-positive workplace: How mindfulness facilitates constructive conflict management," 2020, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • "Reducing Customer-Directed Deviant Behavior: The Roles of Psychological Detachment and Supervisory Unfairness," 2020, Journal of Management
  • "Consequentialist Motives for Punishment Signal Trustworthiness," 2020, Journal of Business Ethics
  • "Why have we not detected gender differences in organizational justice perceptions?! An evidenced-based argument for increasing inclusivity within justice research," 2024, Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • "The role of CEO accounts and perceived integrity in analysts' forecasts," 2023, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Frequent collaborators in Skarlicki's research include:

  • Ruodan Shao
  • Hsuan-Che Huang
  • Adam Kay
  • Nathan Dhaliwal
  • JoAndrea Hoegg

In recognition of their professional contributions, Skarlicki was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Robert Folger

  • Personality as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Fairness and Retaliation

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Robert Folger;Paul Tesluk

  • Exploring the Role of Emotions in Injustice Perceptions and Retaliation.

    Laurie J. Barclay;Daniel P. Skarlicki;S. Douglas Pugh

  • Applicants' and Employees' Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Effects of First‐Party Justice Perceptions and Moral Identity

    Deborah E. Rupp;Ruodan Shao;Meghan A. Thornton;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union : A test of organizational justice theory

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Gary P. Latham

  • The Role of Job Demands and Emotional Exhaustion in the Relationship Between Customer and Employee Incivility

    Danielle D. van Jaarsveld;David D. Walker;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • Getting even for customer mistreatment: the role of moral identity in the relationship between customer interpersonal injustice and employee sabotage.

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Danielle D. van Jaarsveld;David D. Walker

  • Unfairness and resistance to change: hardship as mistreatment

    Robert Folger;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • THIRD-PARTY REACTIONS TO EMPLOYEE (MIS)TREATMENT: A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Carol T. Kulik

  • LEADERSHIP TRAINING IN ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE TO INCREASE CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR WITHIN A LABOR UNION: A REPLICATION

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Gary P. Latham

  • After the fall: Layoff victims' trust and cynicism in re‐employment

    S. Douglas Pugh;Daniel P. Skarlicki;Brian S. Passell

  • Culture and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it.

    Joel Brockner;Ya-Ru Chen;Elizabeth A. Mannix;Kwok Leung

  • Trust in Leaders: Existing Research and Emerging Issues.

    Kurt T. Dirks;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • Employee Justice Across Cultures: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Ruodan Shao;Deborah E. Rupp;Daniel P. Skarlicki;Kisha S. Jones

  • When Tough Times Make Tough Bosses: Managerial Distancing as a Function of Layoff Blame

    Robert Folger;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • Exploring the effects of individual customer incivility encounters on employee incivility: the moderating roles of entity (in)civility and negative affectivity.

    David D. Walker;Danielle D. van Jaarsveld;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • Dual processing and organizational justice: the role of rational versus experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment.

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Deborah E. Rupp

  • Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR-specific relative autonomy and individualism

    Deborah E. Rupp;Ruodan Shao;Daniel P. Skarlicki;Elizabeth Layne Paddock

  • Third-party perceptions of a layoff: Procedural, derogation, and retributive aspects of justice.

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;John H. Ellard;Brad R. C. Kelln

  • The Relationship Between Being Perceived as Trustworthy by Coworkers and Individual Performance

    Kurt T. Dirks;Daniel P. Skarlicki

  • A popcorn metaphor for employee aggression.

    Robert Folger;Daniel P. Skarlicki

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah E. Rupp
Deborah E. Rupp George Mason University
Robert Folger
Robert Folger University of Central Florida
Gary P. Latham
Gary P. Latham University of Toronto
Karl Aquino
Karl Aquino University of British Columbia
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Carol T. Kulik
Carol T. Kulik University of South Australia
Julian Barling
Julian Barling Queen's University
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Debra L. Shapiro
Debra L. Shapiro University of Maryland, College Park
Adele Diamond
Adele Diamond University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding careers, especially in mental health services. Many students choose to continue their education online, allowing flexibility while gaining the qualifications needed for roles such as mental health counselor, social worker, or case manager.

If you’re considering a career as a counselor, it’s essential to understand state-specific licensing and education requirements. For example, those interested in practicing in California should review the mental health counselor requirements in Glendale. Similarly, aspiring professionals can find details about how to become a mental health counselor in Greensboro and the steps involved in how to become a mental health counselor in Henderson.

Requirements may include earning a master’s in counseling or a related field, supervised clinical experience, and passing a licensing exam. In Hawaii, for instance, you’ll want to explore the specific Honolulu mental health counselor education requirements. By comparing pathways in various locations, you can select the educational route and career path that’s right for you.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel P. Skarlicki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles