World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
50
Citations
19707
World Ranking
2679
National Ranking
458

Angela Harden publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Harden sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 182 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Angela Harden D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Harden sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Angela Harden is affiliated with City, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and health professions, with significant contributions to obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, clinical psychology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including maternal and perinatal health interventions, global maternal and child health, migration, health and trauma, child and adolescent health, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, family and disability support research, and gestational diabetes research and management.

Frequent publication venues for their research include BMJ Open, Midwifery, Pilot and Feasibility Studies, BMC Health Services Research, and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Notable recent papers by Angela Harden include:

  • Project 20: Midwives' insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how (2020) Midwifery
  • Project20: Does continuity of care and community-based antenatal care improve maternal and neonatal birth outcomes for women with social risk factors? A prospective, observational study (2021) PLoS ONE
  • Project20: Interpreter services for pregnant women with social risk factors in England: what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how? (2021) International Journal for Equity in Health
  • Group antenatal care (Pregnancy Circles) for diverse and disadvantaged women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluations (2020) BMC Health Services Research
  • Ethnic minority women's experiences of accessing antenatal care in high income European countries: a systematic review (2023) BMC Health Services Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Angela Harden include Meg Wiggins, Christine McCourt, Anita Mehay, Lorna Sweeney, and Mary Sawtell.

Best Publications

  • Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

    James Thomas;Angela Harden

  • Young people and healthy eating: a systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators

    Jonathan Shepherd;Angela Harden;Rebecca Rees;Ginny Brunton

  • Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews

    James Thomas;Angela Harden;Ann Oakley;Sandy Oliver

  • Methodological Issues in Combining Diverse Study Types in Systematic Reviews

    Angela Harden;James Thomas

  • COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies)

    Andrew Booth;Karin Hannes;Angela Harden;Jane Noyes

  • Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis

    Alison O'Mara-Eves;Ginny Brunton;David McDaid;Sandy Oliver

  • Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings

    Jane Noyes;Andrew Booth;Kate Flemming;Ruth Garside

  • Applying systematic review methods to studies of people’s views: an example from public health research

    Angela Harden;Jo Garcia;Sandy Oliver;Rebecca Rees

  • Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage: systematic review integrating controlled trials and qualitative studies

    Angela Harden;Ginny Brunton;Adam Fletcher;Ann Oakley

  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion interventions in the workplace.

    A. Harden;G. Peersman;S. Oliver;M. Mauthner

  • Children and healthy eating: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators

    James Thomas;Katy Sutcliffe;Angela Harden;Ann Oakley

  • An Emerging Framework for Including Different Types of Evidence in Systematic Reviews for Public Policy

    Sandy Oliver;Angela Harden;Rebecca Rees;Jonathan Shepherd

  • Young people and physical activity: a systematic review matching their views to effective interventions

    Rebecca Rees;Josephine Kavanagh;Angela Harden;Jonathan Shepherd

  • The school environment and student health: a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative research

    Farah Jamal;Adam Fletcher;Angela Harden;Angela Harden;Helene Anne Wells

  • Systematic review of the effects of schools and school environment interventions on health: evidence mapping and synthesis

    C. Bonell;F. Jamal;A. Harden;H. Wells

  • Peer-delivered health promotion for young people: A systematic review of different study designs:

    Angela Harden;Ann Oakley;Sandy Oliver

  • The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of behavioural interventions for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections in young people aged 13-19: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

    Jonathan Shepherd;J. Kavanagh;Joanna Picot;Keith Cooper

  • Synthesis: combining results systematically and appropriately

    James Thomas;Angela Harden;Mark Newman

  • The effects of the school environment on student health: A systematic review of multi-level studies

    Chris Bonell;Will Parry;Helene Wells;Farah Jamal

  • Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis.

    Janet L. Harris;Andrew Booth;Margaret Cargo;Karin Hannes

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann Oakley
Ann Oakley University College London
Sandy Oliver
Sandy Oliver University College London
James Thomas
James Thomas University College London
Adam Fletcher
Adam Fletcher Cardiff University
Chris Bonell
Chris Bonell London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Andrew Booth
Andrew Booth University of Sheffield
Simon Murphy
Simon Murphy Cardiff University
Laurence Moore
Laurence Moore University of Glasgow
Rona Campbell
Rona Campbell University of Bristol
Margaret Cargo
Margaret Cargo University of Canberra

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a wide variety of rewarding online degree programs and career options. Many students choose flexible learning options that allow them to fast-track their studies or balance education with work commitments.

If you are interested in social work, consider exploring accelerated online msw programs to begin making an impact in communities sooner. For those passionate about understanding human behavior, an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology can provide a strong foundation, enabling graduates to move quickly into counseling, research, or further studies.

Counseling is another high-demand path, and choosing from cacrep accredited programs online ensures that your degree meets rigorous professional standards—a key requirement for many licensure boards. Similarly, if your goal is to help families and couples navigate challenges, earning a marriage and family therapist degree online provides a specialized track for this rewarding field.

These pathways not only offer the flexibility of online study, but also lead to meaningful careers that have a lasting positive impact on individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Angela Harden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles