World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan C. Craig

Jonathan C. Craig

Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
147
Citations
124030
World Ranking
1251
National Ranking
35

Jonathan C. Craig publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan C. Craig sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,003 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jonathan C. Craig D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan C. Craig sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 147 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Jonathan C. Craig is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Nephrology. Their academic contributions extend across various subfields including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, as well as Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their work covers a range of topics, with a particular concentration on Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life. Additional topics include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies, and the Delphi Technique in Research.

Jonathan C. Craig has published extensively in several scholarly venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Kidney International
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Their recent papers reflect ongoing engagement with clinical guidelines and summaries related to chronic kidney disease and diabetes management. These recent publications are:

  • KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022), Kidney International
  • Executive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases (2021), Kidney International
  • Executive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease (2021), Kidney International
  • Executive summary of the 2020 KDIGO Diabetes Management in CKD Guideline: evidence-based advances in monitoring and treatment (2020), Kidney International
  • Executive summary of the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: an update based on rapidly emerging new evidence (2022), Kidney International

Collaboration with other researchers is a notable aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors include Germaine Wong, Martin Howell, Allison Tong, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, and Nicole Scholes-Robertson. These collaborations indicate an integrated network of research activity within nephrology and related health fields.

Best Publications

  • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Jonathan Craig;Jonathan Craig

  • Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Kate Flemming;Elizabeth McInnes;Sandy Oliver

  • The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Colin Baigent;Martin J Landray;Christina Reith;Jonathan Emberson

  • Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections

    Ruth G. Jepson;Gabrielle Williams;Jonathan C. Craig

  • Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies

    Holger J. Schünemann;Andrew D. Oxman;Jan Brozek;Paul Glasziou

  • KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: a summary

    Bertram L. Kasiske;Martin G. Zeier;Jeremy R. Chapman;Jonathan C. Craig

  • Accuracy of procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Benjamin M.P. Tang;Guy D. Eslick;Jonathan C. Craig;Anthony Stuart McLean

  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis

    Bruce A Cooper;Pauline Branley;Liliana Bulfone;John F Collins

  • Long-Term Survival of Children with End-Stage Renal Disease

    Stephen P. McDonald;Jonathan C. Craig

  • Serum Levels of Phosphorus, Parathyroid Hormone, and Calcium and Risks of Death and Cardiovascular Disease in Individuals With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Suetonia C. Palmer;Andrew Hayen;Petra Macaskill;Fabio Pellegrini

  • Prevalence of depression in chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

    Suetonia Palmer;Mariacristina Vecchio;Jonathan C. Craig;Marcello Tonelli

  • Associations between Hemodialysis Access Type and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review

    Pietro Ravani;Suetonia C. Palmer;Matthew J. Oliver;Robert R. Quinn

  • Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised trial data

    Angela C Webster;Rebecca C Woodroffe;Rod S Taylor;Jeremy R Chapman

  • Prevention of recurrent miscarriage for women with antiphospholipid antibody or lupus anticoagulant

    Marianne Empson;Marissa Nichole Lassere;Jonathan C. Craig;James R. Scott

  • Antibiotic prophylaxis and recurrent urinary tract infection in children.

    Jonathan C. Craig;Judy M. Simpson;Gabrielle J. Williams;Alison Lowe

  • Clinical trials in children

    Patrina H Y Caldwell;Patrina H Y Caldwell;Sharon B Murphy;Phyllis N Butow;Jonathan C Craig;Jonathan C Craig

  • Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways

    Patrick M Bossuyt;Les Irwig;Jonathan Craig;Paul Glasziou

  • Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies

    Davinder Singh-Grewal;Joseph Macdessi;Jonathan Craig

  • Effects of statins in patients with chronic kidney disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials

    Giovanni F M Strippoli;Sankar D Navaneethan;David W Johnson;Vlado Perkovic

  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

    Mark J. Sarnak;Kerstin Amann;Sripal Bangalore;João L. Cavalcante

Frequent Co-Authors

Allison Tong
Allison Tong University of Sydney
Giovanni F.M. Strippoli
Giovanni F.M. Strippoli University of Sydney
Angela C. Webster
Angela C. Webster University of Sydney
Suetonia C. Palmer
Suetonia C. Palmer University of Otago
Jeremy R. Chapman
Jeremy R. Chapman University of Sydney
Carmel M. Hawley
Carmel M. Hawley University of Queensland
Alan Cass
Alan Cass Charles Darwin University
Steven J. Chadban
Steven J. Chadban University of Sydney
Marcello Tonelli
Marcello Tonelli University of Calgary
Stephen P. McDonald
Stephen P. McDonald University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in healthcare doesn’t always require a traditional medical degree. Many students choose online degree programs or certifications that open doors to diverse roles within the medical field. These online options provide flexibility, affordability, and the potential to enter the healthcare workforce more quickly.

For example, pursuing a him degree online can lead to careers in managing patient data and maintaining healthcare information systems. Those interested in administrative and technical roles may benefit from a medical billing and coding certification online, which is highly valued by hospitals and private practices.

Nursing remains a popular and rewarding path. Many professionals choose cheapest np school online options to advance their qualifications and responsibilities as nurse practitioners. If you’re just starting out, there are also cheap online nursing programs that offer quality education without a high price tag.

Exploring these pathways can help you launch or advance your healthcare career while balancing other commitments and managing costs effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan C. Craig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles