World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Braden J. Manns

Braden J. Manns

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 112 5176 4856 204 194 571 42731

Braden J. Manns publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Braden J. Manns between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Braden J. Manns published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 19.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2017. 17 of the 596 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2017. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 49 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 3 publications
1996 2026

596 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Braden J. Manns: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 2
2001 7
2002 11
2003 9
2004 8
2005 11
2006 21
2007 26
2008 23
2009 28
2010 21
2011 28
2012 31
2013 34
2014 40
2015 24
2016 30
2017 49
2018 29
2019 34
2020 24
2021 43
2022 14
2023 17
2024 12
2025 14
2026 3
Total 596
Download as CSV

Braden J. Manns publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Braden J. Manns sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 571 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 571
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Braden J. Manns D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Braden J. Manns sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399 112
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Braden J. Manns is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada and has an extensive research record primarily within the field of Medicine, encompassing 194 publications. Their work spans several subfields, including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Nephrology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research focuses on various topics related to healthcare and chronic disease management. Major themes include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Healthcare Policy and Management, Healthcare cost, quality, and practices, Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes, Chronic Disease Management Strategies, and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

Several frequent collaborators have contributed to their body of work, notably:

  • Brenda R. Hemmelgarn (45 coauthored publications)
  • Marcello Tonelli (40)
  • Matthew T. James (22)
  • Paul E. Ronksley (19)
  • Meghan J. Elliott (16)

The scientist has published in diverse venues, frequently appearing in:

  • Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (10 publications)
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (9)
  • CMAJ Open (7)
  • Canadian Journal of Diabetes (5)
  • PLoS ONE (4)

Recent publications by Braden J. Manns include:

  • The impact of COVID-19 on hospital admissions and emergency department visits: A population-based study, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Accounting for Age in the Definition of Chronic Kidney Disease, 2021, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Attitudes, current behaviours and barriers to public health measures that reduce COVID-19 transmission: A qualitative study to inform public health messaging, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Estimating Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio from Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio: Development of Equations using Same-Day Measurements, 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Establishing core outcome domains in pediatric kidney disease: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Children and Adolescents (SONG-KIDS) consensus workshops, 2020, Kidney International

Best Publications

  • Relation Between Kidney Function, Proteinuria, and Adverse Outcomes

    Brenda R. Hemmelgarn;Braden J. Manns;Anita Lloyd;Matthew T. James

  • Risk of coronary events in people with chronic kidney disease compared with those with diabetes: a population-level cohort study.

    Marcello Tonelli;Paul Muntner;Anita Lloyd;Braden J Manns

  • Effect of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis on left ventricular mass and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial.

    Bruce F. Culleton;Michael Walsh;Scott W. Klarenbach;Garth Mortis

  • Associations between Hemodialysis Access Type and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review

    Pietro Ravani;Suetonia C. Palmer;Matthew J. Oliver;Robert R. Quinn

  • Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Andrea C Tricco;Noah M Ivers;Jeremy M Grimshaw;Jeremy M Grimshaw;David Moher;David Moher

  • Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease

    Adeera Levin;Brenda Hemmelgarn;Bruce Culleton;Sheldon Tobe

  • Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access.

    Helen Lee;Braden Manns;Ken Taub;William A. Ghali

  • Adapting the charlson comorbidity index for use in patients with ESRD

    Brenda R Hemmelgarn;Braden J Manns;Hude Quan;William A Ghali

  • Impact of anemia on hospitalization and mortality in older adults

    Bruce F. Culleton;Braden J. Manns;Jianguo Zhang;Marcello Tonelli

  • Cause of Death in Patients with Reduced Kidney Function

    Stephanie Thompson;Matthew James;Natasha Wiebe;Brenda Hemmelgarn

  • Early Risk of Stroke After Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Caren M. Wu;Kevin McLaughlin;Diane L. Lorenzetti;Michael D. Hill

  • Renal replacement therapy in patients with acute renal failure: a systematic review.

    Neesh Pannu;Scott Klarenbach;Natasha Wiebe;Braden Manns

  • Progression of kidney dysfunction in the community-dwelling elderly

    B.R. Hemmelgarn;J. Zhang;B.J. Manns;M. Tonelli

  • Oral phosphate binders in patients with kidney failure.

    Marcello Tonelli;Neesh Pannu;Braden Manns

  • Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.

    Fiona Clement;Anthony H Harris;Jing Jing Li;Karen Kah Leng Yong

  • Acute renal failure in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the impact of dialytic modality on mortality and renal recovery

    Marcello Tonelli;Braden Manns;David Feller-Kopman

  • Associations Between Acute Kidney Injury and Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes After Coronary Angiography

    Matthew T James;William A Ghali;Merril L Knudtson;Pietro Ravani

  • Glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and the incidence and consequences of acute kidney injury: a cohort study

    Matthew T James;Brenda R Hemmelgarn;Natasha Wiebe;Neesh Pannu

  • NSAID Use and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

    Katherine Gooch;Bruce F. Culleton;Braden J. Manns;Jianguo Zhang

  • Progression of kidney dysfunction in the community-dwelling elderly. Commentary

    F. Locatelli;P. Pozzoni;B. R. Hemmelgarn;J. Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Brenda R. Hemmelgarn
Brenda R. Hemmelgarn University of Calgary
Marcello Tonelli
Marcello Tonelli University of Calgary
Scott Klarenbach
Scott Klarenbach University of Alberta
William A. Ghali
William A. Ghali University of Calgary
Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Allison Tong
Allison Tong University of Sydney
Cam Donaldson
Cam Donaldson Glasgow Caledonian University
Jonathan C. Craig
Jonathan C. Craig Flinders University
Hude Quan
Hude Quan University of Calgary
Claudia Sanmartin
Claudia Sanmartin Environment and Climate Change Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees can provide more flexibility and open new doors for those interested in healthcare careers in the USA. Online programs now cover a range of paths, from nursing to health administration, tailored for different educational backgrounds.

Students searching for the cheapest dnp program will find programs that balance affordability with quality, helping students advance to leadership nursing roles or nurse practitioner positions without breaking the bank.

If your goal is to enter the workforce quickly, consider looking for what is the fastest way to become an lpn. These online programs can dramatically reduce the time needed to become a Licensed Practical Nurse, preparing students for entry-level nursing jobs in a matter of months.

For those with a bachelor’s in nursing, many universities now offer bsn to np programs online. These fast-track options enable RN professionals to quickly gain advanced clinical skills and move into highly specialized roles, such as psychiatric nurse practitioner.

Alternatively, a health care administration online degree is ideal for those interested in managing medical organizations, offering affordable routes to leadership positions without direct patient care.

Best Scientists Citing Braden J. Manns

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles