World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 90 11939 11231 379 371 564 70610

Allison Tong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Allison Tong between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Allison Tong published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 93 publications in 2021. 36 of the 644 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 93. Peak 93 publications in 2021. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 42 publications 2017: 58 publications 2018: 49 publications 2019: 61 publications 2020: 74 publications 2021: 93 publications 2022: 52 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 35 publications 2026: 1 publication
1976 2026

644 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Allison Tong: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 4
2005 0
2006 1
2007 2
2008 5
2009 5
2010 12
2011 10
2012 29
2013 23
2014 33
2015 34
2016 42
2017 58
2018 49
2019 61
2020 74
2021 93
2022 52
2023 7
2024 12
2025 35
2026 1
Total 644
Download as CSV

Allison Tong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allison Tong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 564 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 564
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Allison Tong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allison Tong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 90
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Allison Tong is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has a research profile concentrated primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans various subfields including Nephrology, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their main research topics include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Healthcare cost, quality, practices, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Organ Donation and Transplantation, and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments.

Allison Tong has contributed to numerous publications, with recent papers covering important topics in kidney disease and management. Selected papers include:

  • Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference, 2020, Kidney International
  • Membranous nephropathy, 2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Blood pressure and volume management in dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference, 2020, Kidney International
  • A core outcome set for post-COVID-19 condition in adults for use in clinical practice and research: an international Delphi consensus study, 2022, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Patient-centred approaches for the management of unpleasant symptoms in kidney disease, 2022, Nature Reviews Nephrology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Allison Tong include Jonathan C. Craig, Martin Howell, Nicole Scholes-Robertson, Ifeoma Ulasi, and Sharon Andreoli. These collaborations reflect an engaged network within kidney disease research and health sciences.

The scientist has published extensively in specific venues, which include:

  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • BMJ Open
  • Kidney International

This body of work highlights a consistent focus on nephrology and related clinical and public health issues. Their research integrates clinical practice concerns with broader health system and economic evaluations, maintaining a patient-centered approach particularly visible in work relating to dialysis, kidney disease management, and the impacts of chronic illness conditions.

Best Publications

  • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Jonathan Craig;Jonathan Craig

  • Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Kate Flemming;Elizabeth McInnes;Sandy Oliver

  • Older people's perspectives on participation in physical activity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature

    Marcia R Franco;Allison Tong;Kirsten Howard;Catherine Sherrington

  • The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

    R L Morton;A Tong;K Howard;P Snelling

  • Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature

    Michelle J. Irving;Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Stephen Jan;Alan Cass

  • Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Christopher T. Chan;Peter J. Blankestijn;Laura M. Dember;Maurizio Gallieni

  • Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Living With CKD

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Steven Chadban;Rowan G. Walker

  • Patient and Caregiver Priorities for Outcomes in Hemodialysis: An International Nominal Group Technique Study

    Rachel Urquhart-Secord;Rachel Urquhart-Secord;Jonathan C. Craig;Jonathan C. Craig;Brenda Hemmelgarn;Helen Tam-Tham

  • Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey.

    Nicole Evangelidis;Nicole Evangelidis;Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Braden Manns;Brenda Hemmelgarn

  • Experiences of parents who have children with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

    Allison Tong;Alison Lowe;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Jonathan C. Craig;Jonathan C. Craig

  • Catheter-Related Interventions to Prevent Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials

    Giovanni F.M. Strippoli;Allison Tong;David Johnson;Francesco P. Schena

  • Comparative Survival and Economic Benefits of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation and Dialysis in People with Varying Ages and Co-Morbidities

    Germaine Wong;Germaine Wong;Germaine Wong;Kirsten Howard;Jeremy Robert Chapman;Steven Chadban

  • Parental perspectives on caring for a child with chronic kidney disease: an in-depth interview study

    A. Tong;A. Lowe;P. Sainsbury;P. Sainsbury;J. C. Craig;J. C. Craig

  • Dietary and fluid restrictions in CKD: a thematic synthesis of patient views from qualitative studies.

    Suetonia C Palmer;Camilla S Hanson;Jonathan C Craig;Jonathan C Craig;Giovanni F M Strippoli

  • Establishing Core Outcome Domains in Hemodialysis: Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology–Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Consensus Workshop

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Braden Manns;Brenda Hemmelgarn;David C. Wheeler

  • Support interventions for caregivers of people with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

    Allison Tong;Peter Geoffrey Sainsbury;Jonathan C. Craig

  • Children's experiences of living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

    Allison Tong;Julie Jones;Jonathan C. Craig;Davinder Singh-Grewal

  • Experiences and perspectives of adults living with systemic lupus erythematosus: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

    Bernadet Sutanto;Davinder Singh-Grewal;H. Patrick McNeil;Sean O'Neill

  • Developing a set of core outcomes for trials in haemodialysis: an international Delphi survey

    N. Evangelidis;A. Tong;B. Manns;B. Hemmelgarn

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan C. Craig
Jonathan C. Craig Flinders University
Jeremy R. Chapman
Jeremy R. Chapman University of Sydney
Carmel M. Hawley
Carmel M. Hawley University of Queensland
Giovanni F.M. Strippoli
Giovanni F.M. Strippoli University of Sydney
Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer
Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer Baylor College of Medicine
Steven J. Chadban
Steven J. Chadban University of Sydney
Suetonia C. Palmer
Suetonia C. Palmer University of Otago
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh University of California, Irvine
Peter Tugwell
Peter Tugwell University of Ottawa
David C. Wheeler
David C. Wheeler University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers related to Medicine in the USA extends beyond becoming a physician. There are many rewarding online degree options for healthcare professionals seeking flexibility and advancement. For working nurses, expedited programs can make higher education more accessible and affordable.

Those looking to fast-track their nursing careers may consider lpn accelerated program options. These pathways are designed for quick entry into the field, with coursework focused on essential clinical skills.

RNs aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles can benefit from the shortest dnp program online or even a 1 year dnp program online. These doctorates emphasize evidence-based practice and prepare nurses for top-tier positions and clinical authority.

Mental health is another expanding field, and nurses interested in psychiatric care may pursue psych np online programs to become certified psychiatric nurse practitioners.

Each of these online programs offers accelerated pathways to help you reach your career goals—whether you’re just starting out or looking to elevate your impact in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Allison Tong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles