World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
70610
World Ranking
11940
National Ranking
379

Allison Tong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allison Tong sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 564 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Allison Tong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allison Tong sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Allison Tong is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has a research profile concentrated primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans various subfields including Nephrology, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their main research topics include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Healthcare cost, quality, practices, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Organ Donation and Transplantation, and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments.

Allison Tong has contributed to numerous publications, with recent papers covering important topics in kidney disease and management. Selected papers include:

  • Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference, 2020, Kidney International
  • Membranous nephropathy, 2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Blood pressure and volume management in dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference, 2020, Kidney International
  • A core outcome set for post-COVID-19 condition in adults for use in clinical practice and research: an international Delphi consensus study, 2022, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Patient-centred approaches for the management of unpleasant symptoms in kidney disease, 2022, Nature Reviews Nephrology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Allison Tong include Jonathan C. Craig, Martin Howell, Nicole Scholes-Robertson, Ifeoma Ulasi, and Sharon Andreoli. These collaborations reflect an engaged network within kidney disease research and health sciences.

The scientist has published extensively in specific venues, which include:

  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • BMJ Open
  • Kidney International

This body of work highlights a consistent focus on nephrology and related clinical and public health issues. Their research integrates clinical practice concerns with broader health system and economic evaluations, maintaining a patient-centered approach particularly visible in work relating to dialysis, kidney disease management, and the impacts of chronic illness conditions.

Best Publications

  • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Jonathan Craig;Jonathan Craig

  • Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Kate Flemming;Elizabeth McInnes;Sandy Oliver

  • Older people's perspectives on participation in physical activity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature

    Marcia R Franco;Allison Tong;Kirsten Howard;Catherine Sherrington

  • Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference.

    Andrew S. Levey;Kai-Uwe Eckardt;Nijsje M. Dorman;Stacy L. Christiansen

  • The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

    R L Morton;A Tong;K Howard;P Snelling

  • Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature

    Michelle J. Irving;Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Stephen Jan;Alan Cass

  • Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Christopher T. Chan;Peter J. Blankestijn;Laura M. Dember;Maurizio Gallieni

  • Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Living With CKD

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Steven Chadban;Rowan G. Walker

  • Patient and Caregiver Priorities for Outcomes in Hemodialysis: An International Nominal Group Technique Study

    Rachel Urquhart-Secord;Rachel Urquhart-Secord;Jonathan C. Craig;Jonathan C. Craig;Brenda Hemmelgarn;Helen Tam-Tham

  • Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey.

    Nicole Evangelidis;Nicole Evangelidis;Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Braden Manns;Brenda Hemmelgarn

  • Experiences of parents who have children with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

    Allison Tong;Alison Lowe;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Jonathan C. Craig;Jonathan C. Craig

  • Catheter-Related Interventions to Prevent Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials

    Giovanni F.M. Strippoli;Allison Tong;David Johnson;Francesco P. Schena

  • Comparative Survival and Economic Benefits of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation and Dialysis in People with Varying Ages and Co-Morbidities

    Germaine Wong;Germaine Wong;Germaine Wong;Kirsten Howard;Jeremy Robert Chapman;Steven Chadban

  • Parental perspectives on caring for a child with chronic kidney disease: an in-depth interview study

    A. Tong;A. Lowe;P. Sainsbury;P. Sainsbury;J. C. Craig;J. C. Craig

  • Dietary and fluid restrictions in CKD: a thematic synthesis of patient views from qualitative studies.

    Suetonia C Palmer;Camilla S Hanson;Jonathan C Craig;Jonathan C Craig;Giovanni F M Strippoli

  • Establishing Core Outcome Domains in Hemodialysis: Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology–Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Consensus Workshop

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Braden Manns;Brenda Hemmelgarn;David C. Wheeler

  • Support interventions for caregivers of people with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

    Allison Tong;Peter Geoffrey Sainsbury;Jonathan C. Craig

  • Children's experiences of living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

    Allison Tong;Julie Jones;Jonathan C. Craig;Davinder Singh-Grewal

  • Experiences and perspectives of adults living with systemic lupus erythematosus: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

    Bernadet Sutanto;Davinder Singh-Grewal;H. Patrick McNeil;Sean O'Neill

  • Developing a set of core outcomes for trials in haemodialysis: an international Delphi survey

    N. Evangelidis;A. Tong;B. Manns;B. Hemmelgarn

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan C. Craig
Jonathan C. Craig Flinders University
Jeremy R. Chapman
Jeremy R. Chapman University of Sydney
Carmel M. Hawley
Carmel M. Hawley University of Queensland
Giovanni F.M. Strippoli
Giovanni F.M. Strippoli University of Sydney
Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer
Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer Baylor College of Medicine
Steven J. Chadban
Steven J. Chadban University of Sydney
Suetonia C. Palmer
Suetonia C. Palmer University of Otago
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh University of California, Irvine
Peter Tugwell
Peter Tugwell University of Ottawa
David C. Wheeler
David C. Wheeler University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers related to Medicine in the USA extends beyond becoming a physician. There are many rewarding online degree options for healthcare professionals seeking flexibility and advancement. For working nurses, expedited programs can make higher education more accessible and affordable.

Those looking to fast-track their nursing careers may consider lpn accelerated program options. These pathways are designed for quick entry into the field, with coursework focused on essential clinical skills.

RNs aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles can benefit from the shortest dnp program online or even a 1 year dnp program online. These doctorates emphasize evidence-based practice and prepare nurses for top-tier positions and clinical authority.

Mental health is another expanding field, and nurses interested in psychiatric care may pursue psych np online programs to become certified psychiatric nurse practitioners.

Each of these online programs offers accelerated pathways to help you reach your career goals—whether you’re just starting out or looking to elevate your impact in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Allison Tong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles