Andrew Booth spends much of his time researching Qualitative research, Systematic review, Management science, Health care and MEDLINE. Andrew Booth interconnects Research design, Health services research, Psychological intervention and Medical education in the investigation of issues within Qualitative research. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Social science, Primary research, Citation, Data science and Critical appraisal.
His research integrates issues of Variety and Process in his study of Management science. His work investigates the relationship between Health care and topics such as Nursing that intersect with problems in Conceptual framework. Andrew Booth studied MEDLINE and Multimethodology that intersect with Implementation research.
His primary scientific interests are in Systematic review, Qualitative research, MEDLINE, Nursing and Psychological intervention. His Systematic review research includes themes of Data science and Process. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Qualitative research, Evidence-based medicine is strongly linked to Evidence-based practice.
His work in CINAHL and Cochrane Library is related to MEDLINE. As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Nursing, narrowing it down to issues related to the Health care, and often Knowledge management. His Psychological intervention study combines topics in areas such as Intervention and Family medicine.
His primary areas of investigation include Qualitative research, Systematic review, Psychological intervention, MEDLINE and Nursing. His Qualitative research research incorporates elements of Breast feeding, Guideline, Management science and Critical appraisal. The Systematic review study which covers Process that intersects with Transparency.
His Psychological intervention research includes elements of Intervention, Service delivery framework, Health care and Social support. His studies deal with areas such as Knowledge management and Infection control as well as Health care. His studies in MEDLINE integrate themes in fields like Meta-analysis, Identification, Low and middle income countries and Clinical trial.
Andrew Booth focuses on Systematic review, Qualitative research, MEDLINE, Dementia and Guideline. His Systematic review study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Noncommunicable disease, Knowledge management, Project commissioning, Strengths and weaknesses and Process. His study in Process is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Transparency, Empirical research, Program evaluation and Data science.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Universal precautions, CLARITY, Management science and Medical education in addition to Qualitative research. His Management science study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Psychological intervention and Complex interventions. In his research on the topic of MEDLINE, Information retrieval, Information science and Capacity building is strongly related with Identification.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Maria J. Grant;Andrew Booth.
Health Information and Libraries Journal (2009)
A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity
Christopher Carroll;Malcolm Patterson;Stephen Wood;Andrew Booth.
Implementation Science (2007)
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
Andrew Booth;Diana Papaioannou;Anthea Sutton.
(2012)
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective:
Mary Dixon-Woods;Sheila Bonas;Andrew Booth;David R. Jones.
Qualitative Research (2006)
Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
Alison Cooke;Debbie Smith;Andrew Booth.
Qualitative Health Research (2012)
Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work
Susan A Nancarrow;Andrew Booth;Steven Ariss;Tony Smith.
Human Resources for Health (2013)
A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.
J Brazier;M Deverill;C Green;R Harper.
Health Technology Assessment (1999)
Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)
Simon Lewin;Claire Glenton;Heather Munthe-Kaas;Benedicte Carlsen.
PLOS Medicine (2015)
Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods
Mary Dixon-Woods;Alex Sutton;Rachel L. Shaw;Tina Miller.
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy (2007)
Routine preoperative testing: a systematic review of the evidence.
Munro J;Booth A;Nicholl J.
Health Technology Assessment (1997)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
University of Sheffield
South African Medical Research Council
Bangor University
University of Melbourne
University of Sheffield
University of Toronto
University of Warwick
City, University of London
World Health Organization
University of New South Wales
University of South Florida
British Antarctic Survey
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
University of York
University of Freiburg
Goddard Space Flight Center
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
University at Albany, State University of New York
University of California, Davis
University of Mississippi
Medical College of Wisconsin
Cleveland Clinic
Brooklyn College
Temple University