World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pierre Pluye

Pierre Pluye

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2673 2444 149 140 194 21310

Pierre Pluye publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pierre Pluye between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pierre Pluye published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2018. 4 of the 217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2018. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
2003 2025

217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pierre Pluye: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 6
2005 6
2006 1
2007 5
2008 2
2009 9
2010 5
2011 11
2012 8
2013 14
2014 12
2015 17
2016 8
2017 15
2018 27
2019 20
2020 17
2021 9
2022 8
2023 12
2024 3
2025 1
Total 217
Download as CSV

Pierre Pluye publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Pluye sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 194 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 194
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Pierre Pluye D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Pluye sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Pierre Pluye is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their research spans multiple fields including Health Professions, Decision Sciences, and Medicine, with a primary emphasis on General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research, and Information Systems.

The scientist's work covers key topics such as Health Policy Implementation Science, Health Literacy and Information Accessibility, Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Evaluation and Performance Assessment, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Personal Information Management and User Behavior, and Data Quality and Management.

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Pierre Pluye include:

  • Mixed methods research in library and information science: A methodological review (2020), Library & Information Science Research
  • Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services: A Realist Synthesis (2020), The Annals of Family Medicine
  • Factors and outcomes of collaborative information seeking: A mixed studies review with a framework synthesis (2021), Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example (2024), Research Synthesis Methods
  • Curriculum frameworks and educational programs in artificial intelligence for medical students, residents, and practicing physicians: a scoping review protocol (2023), JBI Evidence Synthesis

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Pierre Pluye are:

  • Reem El Sherif
  • Vera Granikov
  • Quan Nha Hong
  • Roland Grad
  • France Bouthillier

The scientist's publications often appear in venues such as Education for Information, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, Healthcare Informatics, and Library & Information Science Research.

Best Publications

  • The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018 for Information Professionals and Researchers.

    Quan Nha Hong;Sergi Fàbregues;Gillian Bartlett;Felicity Boardman

  • Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews

    Pierre Pluye;Quan Nha Hong

  • Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review

    Romina Pace;Pierre Pluye;Gillian Bartlett;Ann C. Macaulay

  • Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice

    Justin Jagosh;Ann C. Macaulay;Pierre Pluye;Jon Salsberg

  • A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.

    Pierre Pluye;Marie-Pierre Gagnon;Frances Griffiths;Janique Johnson-Lafleur

  • Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study.

    Quan Nha Hong;Pierre Pluye;Sergi Fàbregues;Gillian Bartlett

  • Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

    Quan Nha Hong;Araceli Gonzalez-Reyes;Pierre Pluye

  • A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects

    Justin Jagosh;Paula L. Bush;Jon Salsberg;Ann C. Macaulay

  • Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals

    Marie-Pierre Gagnon;Marie Desmartis;Michel Labrecque;Josip Car

  • Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence

    Quan Nha Hong;Pierre Pluye;Mathieu Bujold;Maggy Wassef

  • Shortcomings of health information on the Internet.

    Mike Benigeri;Pierre Pluye

  • Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability

    Pierre Pluye;Louise Potvin;Jean-Louis Denis

  • Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model

    Dawn Stacey;Sophie Pouliot;François-Pierre Gauvin

  • Systematic mixed studies reviews: updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

    Rafaella Queiroga Souto;Vladimir Khanassov;Quan Nha Hong;Paula L. Bush

  • An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Ellen Annandale;Richard Ashcroft;James Barlow

  • Validating a conceptual model for an inter‐professional approach to shared decision making: a mixed methods study

    Dawn Stacey;Susie Gagnon;Sandy Dunn

  • Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals

    Marie-Pierre Gagnon;Michel Labrecque;Pierre Frémont

  • Program sustainability begins with the first events

    Pierre Pluye;Louise Potvin;Jean-Louis Denis;Jocelyne Pelletier

  • Program sustainability: focus on organizational routines

    P. Pluye;L. Potvin;J. L. Denis;J. Pelletier

  • Combining classifiers for robust PICO element detection

    Florian Boudin;Jian-Yun Nie;Joan C Bartlett;Roland M Grad

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann C. Macaulay
Ann C. Macaulay McGill University
Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Marie-Pierre Gagnon Université Laval
Margaret Cargo
Margaret Cargo University of Canberra
Tibor Schuster
Tibor Schuster McGill University
R. Brian Haynes
R. Brian Haynes McMaster University
Geoff Wong
Geoff Wong University of Oxford
Lawrence W. Green
Lawrence W. Green University of California, San Francisco
Louise Potvin
Louise Potvin University of Montreal
Frances Griffiths
Frances Griffiths University of Warwick
Trisha Greenhalgh
Trisha Greenhalgh University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, online education offers flexible and accessible pathways to build your credentials and advance your career. Many universities now provide a range of degree options that fit different schedules, budgets, and career goals.

Those looking to fast-track their education can explore the accelerated online bachelor's degree programs, which are designed to help you complete your undergraduate studies in a shorter time frame. For graduate studies, one year graduate programs can help you gain specialized skills and credentials quickly.

Social work is a popular field within social sciences, and there are msw programs available online that are both flexible and affordable for aspiring social workers. For those interested in behavior analysis, the accelerated bcba program online can lead to certification in less time, helping you start your career sooner.

Whether you’re looking to launch a new career or advance in your current role, these online options make studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Pluye

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles