World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ann C. Macaulay

Ann C. Macaulay

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6366 5915 380 364 115 9222

Ann C. Macaulay publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ann C. Macaulay between 1981 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ann C. Macaulay published across 41 years, from 1981 to 2021, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2018. 5 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2018. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications
1981 2021

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ann C. Macaulay: publications per year, 1981 to 2021
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 3
2002 0
2003 5
2004 3
2005 6
2006 4
2007 8
2008 1
2009 5
2010 1
2011 9
2012 5
2013 5
2014 7
2015 6
2016 3
2017 6
2018 12
2019 2
2020 3
2021 2
Total 121
Download as CSV

Ann C. Macaulay publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann C. Macaulay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 115
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ann C. Macaulay D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann C. Macaulay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Ann C. Macaulay is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and specializes in health professions research. Their work predominantly focuses on health policy implementation science, mental health and patient involvement, and health sciences research and education.

Their research covers a range of topics, including child nutrition and water access, poverty, education and child welfare, evaluation and performance assessment, and participatory visual research methods. These areas reflect a multidimensional approach to health professions, combining both general health concerns and specific social determinants.

Macaulay has contributed to several publications, with recent papers including:

  • How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field (2020), published in Health Research Policy and Systems
  • Key issues for participatory research in the design and implementation of humanitarian assistance: a scoping review (2020), published in Global Health Action
  • Reflecting on the use of Concept Mapping as a Method for Community-Led Analysis of Talking Circles (2021), published in Turtle Island Journal of Indigenous Health
  • Atikamekw Nehirowisiw Mirowatisiwin (2021), published in Turtle Island Journal of Indigenous Health
  • Planned Parenthood as a Public Health Imperative: A Participatory Research Exploring the Use of Contraception by Indigenous Women of Chilcapamba, Ecuador (2020), published in Collaborations A Journal of Community-Based Research and Practice

Frequent coauthors in Macaulay's research include Jon Salsberg, Brittany McBeath, Treena Delormier, Sonia Périllat-Amédée, and Alex M. McComber. These collaborations underscore a network of scholars working primarily within health research and community-based approaches.

Their publications have appeared in multiple venues such as:

  • Turtle Island Journal of Indigenous Health
  • Health Research Policy and Systems
  • Global Health Action
  • Collaborations A Journal of Community-Based Research and Practice

Within the broader field of health professions, Macaulay's subfields include general health professions, nutrition and dietetics, safety research, management science and operations research, and sociology and political science. This interdisciplinary engagement supports a comprehensive perspective on health challenges and research methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review

    Romina Pace;Pierre Pluye;Gillian Bartlett;Ann C. Macaulay

  • Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice

    Justin Jagosh;Ann C. Macaulay;Pierre Pluye;Jon Salsberg

  • Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement

    Ann C Macaulay;Laura E Commanda;William L Freeman;Nancy Gibson

  • A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects

    Justin Jagosh;Paula L. Bush;Jon Salsberg;Ann C. Macaulay

  • Implementing participatory intervention and research in communities: lessons from the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project in Canada.

    Louise Potvin;Margaret Cargo;Alex M McComber;Treena Delormier

  • Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools

    Antoine Boivin;Audrey L'Espérance;François-Pierre Gauvin;Vincent Dumez

  • The Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project: Intervention, Evaluation, and Baseline Results of a Diabetes Primary Prevention Program with a Native Community in Canada☆☆☆

    Ann C. Macaulay;Ann C. Macaulay;Gilles Paradis;Gilles Paradis;Louise Potvin;Edward J. Cross

  • Participatory research with Native community of Kahnawake creates innovative code of research ethics

    Ann C. Macaulay;Ann C. Macaulay;Treena Delormier;Alex M. McComber;Edward J. Cross

  • Critical reflections on realist review: insights from customizing the methodology to the needs of participatory research assessment

    Justin Jagosh;Pierre Pluye;Geoff Wong;Margaret Cargo

  • Impact of a diabetes prevention program on body size, physical activity, and diet among Kanien'keha:ka (Mohawk) children 6 to 11 years old: 8-year results from the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project.

    Gilles Paradis;Lucie Lévesque;Ann C. Macaulay;Margaret Cargo

  • Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review.

    Justin Jagosh;Pierre Pluye;Ann C Macaulay;Jon Salsberg

  • Understanding community-based participatory research through a social movement framework: a case study of the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project.

    Marie-Claude Tremblay;Debbie H. Martin;Alex M. McComber;Amelia McGregor

  • Priorities in adolescent health care: the teenager's viewpoint.

    M. Malus;P. A. LaChance;Lubomir Lamy;A. Macaulay

  • Participatory research: What is the history? Has the purpose changed?

    Ann C Macaulay

  • Assessing the benefits of participatory research: A rationale for a realist review

    Ann C. Macaulay;Justin Jagosh;Robbyn Seller;Jim Henderson

  • Successful strategies to engage research partners for translating evidence into action in community health: a critical review.

    Jon Salsberg;David Parry;Pierre Pluye;Soultana Macridis

  • Organizational participatory research: a systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them

    Paula L. Bush;Pierre Pluye;Christine Loignon;Vera Granikov

  • Moving the frontiers forward: incorporating community-based participatory research into practice-based research networks.

    Ann C. Macaulay;Paul A. Nutting

  • Practice-based Research is Community Engagement

    John M. Westfall;Lyle J. Fagnan;Margaret Handley;Jon Salsberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Cargo
Margaret Cargo University of Canberra
Pierre Pluye
Pierre Pluye McGill University
Louise Potvin
Louise Potvin University of Montreal
Gilles Paradis
Gilles Paradis McGill University
Geoff Wong
Geoff Wong University of Oxford
Lawrence W. Green
Lawrence W. Green University of California, San Francisco
Stewart B. Harris
Stewart B. Harris University of Western Ontario
Spencer Moore
Spencer Moore Wageningen University & Research
Jane A. Buxton
Jane A. Buxton University of British Columbia
Trisha Greenhalgh
Trisha Greenhalgh University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a variety of in-demand pathways—especially with the flexibility offered by online education. Whether you’re interested in supporting mental health, guiding families, or influencing social policy, there are accredited programs designed to help you succeed while accommodating your schedule.

Those seeking to work as licensed counselors can benefit from enrolling in cacrep schools, which meet rigorous professional standards in counseling education. If your goal is to specialize in relationship dynamics, a marriage and family therapist degree online can prepare you for impactful roles helping couples and families overcome challenges.

Students interested in understanding human behavior and pursuing careers in research, clinical settings, or education may consider an online degree in psychology. For a broader impact in community health and social services, a masters in social work online can open doors to roles in counseling, advocacy, and community development.

Each of these accredited online programs provides a flexible, affordable pathway into rewarding human-focused professions.

Best Scientists Citing Ann C. Macaulay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles