World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1485 1328 110 102 269 11961

Mark Daniel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Daniel between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Daniel published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2012. 11 of the 298 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2012. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 6 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 9 publications
1988 2025

298 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Daniel: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 5
1993 2
1994 1
1995 6
1996 1
1997 2
1998 3
1999 5
2000 2
2001 4
2002 4
2003 4
2004 6
2005 3
2006 6
2007 5
2008 14
2009 17
2010 13
2011 17
2012 24
2013 22
2014 14
2015 15
2016 8
2017 10
2018 13
2019 17
2020 9
2021 16
2022 10
2023 6
2024 2
2025 9
Total 298
Download as CSV

Mark Daniel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Daniel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 264–273 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 269 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138 269
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Daniel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Daniel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Daniel is affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, with a substantial focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Transportation, Health, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Their academic output reflects interdisciplinary approaches that intersect health outcomes with environmental and social factors.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Obesity and Health Practices

Recent published papers by Mark Daniel include:

  • Testosterone treatment to prevent or revert type 2 diabetes in men enrolled in a lifestyle programme (T4DM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year, phase 3b trial, 2020, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Prevalence of overweight and obesity, and associations with socio-demographic factors in Kuwait, 2021, BMC Public Health
  • Methods for accounting for neighbourhood self-selection in physical activity and dietary behaviour research: a systematic review, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Operationalising the 20-minute neighbourhood, 2022, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Relative 'greenness' and not availability of public open space buffers stressful life events and longitudinal trajectories of psychological distress, 2021, Health & Place

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Mark Daniel include:

  • Neil T. Coffee
  • Suzanne J. Carroll
  • Margaret Cargo
  • Michael J. Dale
  • Gary Wittert

Mark Daniel's research has been published across several venues, with repeated contributions to the following journals and publishers:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • UNC Libraries
  • Health & Place
  • Journal of Transport & Health
  • BMC Public Health

The scholar's work often interrelates public health concerns with environmental and social determinants, including transportation systems and urban design, reflecting an applied approach to health research. Their contributions include empirical studies on obesity, diabetes, psychological distress, and neighborhood effects on health behaviors, indicating a multidisciplinary research agenda rooted in both health sciences and social sciences.

Best Publications

  • Health inequalities and place: a theoretical conception of neighbourhood.

    Paul Bernard;Rana Charafeddine;Katherine L. Frohlich;Mark Daniel

  • Correlations of Mental Tests with Each Other and with Cognitive Variables Are Highest for Low IQ Groups.

    Douglas K. Detterman;Mark H. Daniel

  • The effect of adherence on the association between depressive symptoms and mortality among HIV-infected individuals first initiating HAART.

    Viviane D. Lima;Josie Geller;David R. Bangsberg;Thomas L. Patterson

  • Testosterone treatment to prevent or revert type 2 diabetes in men enrolled in a lifestyle programme (T4DM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year, phase 3b trial

    Gary Wittert;Karen Bracken;Kristy P Robledo;Mathis Grossmann

  • Sex differences in verbal learning

    Joel H. Kramer;Dean C. Delis;Mark H. Daniel

  • International NGOs and the role of network centrality in humanitarian aid operations: a case study of coordination during the 2000 Mozambique floods.

    Spencer Moore;Eugenia Eng;Mark Daniel

  • Effectiveness of a community-directed ‘healthy lifestyle’ program in a remote Australian Aboriginal community

    Kevin G. Rowley;Mark Daniel;Karen Skinner;Michelle Skinner

  • Use of a New Public Bicycle Share Program in Montreal, Canada

    Daniel Fuller;Lise Gauvin;Yan Kestens;Mark Daniel;Mark Daniel

  • Partnerships and coalitions for community-based research.

    Lawrence Green;Mark Daniel;Lloyd Novick

  • Using experienced activity spaces to measure foodscape exposure.

    Yan Kestens;Alexandre Lebel;Mark Daniel;Marius Thériault

  • Adipose tissue density, estimated adipose lipid fraction and whole body adiposity in male cadavers.

    Martin Ad;Daniel Mz;Drinkwater Dt;Clarys Jp

  • Are accessibility and characteristics of public open spaces associated with a better cardiometabolic health

    Catherine Paquet;Catherine Paquet;Thomas P. Orschulok;Neil T. Coffee;Natasha J. Howard

  • Social capital and core network ties: A validation study of individual-level social capital measures and their association with extra- and intra-neighborhood ties, and self-rated health

    Spencer Moore;Ulf Bockenholt;Mark Daniel;Mark Daniel;Mark Daniel;Katherine Frohlich

  • Effectiveness of community-directed diabetes prevention and control in a rural Aboriginal population in British Columbia, Canada.

    Mark Daniel;Lawrence W Green;Lawrence W Green;Stephen A Marion;Diane Gamble

  • Not all social capital is good capital.

    Spencer Moore;Mark Daniel;Mark Daniel;Lise Gauvin;Laurette Dubé

  • Food environment, walkability, and public open spaces are associated with incident development of cardio-metabolic risk factors in a biomedical cohort.

    Catherine Paquet;Catherine Paquet;Neil T. Coffee;Matthew T. Haren;Natasha J. Howard

  • Neighbourhood socioeconomic status, maternal education and adverse birth outcomes among mothers living near highways

    M Généreux;N Auger;M Goneau;M Daniel

  • Framing the biosocial pathways underlying associations between place and cardiometabolic disease.

    Mark Daniel;Spencer Moore;Yan Kestens

  • Association between activity space exposure to food establishments and individual risk of overweight.

    Yan Kestens;Alexandre Lebel;Alexandre Lebel;Basile Chaix;Christelle Clary

  • After Hurricane Floyd Passed: Investigating the Social Determinants of Disaster Preparedness and Recovery

    Spencer Moore;Mark Daniel;Laura Linnan;Marci Campbell

  • Sustained Drug Use Changes After Hepatitis C Screening and Counseling Among Recently Infected Persons Who Inject Drugs: A Longitudinal Study

    Julie Bruneau;Geng Zang;Michal Abrahamowicz;Didier Jutras-Aswad

Frequent Co-Authors

Yan Kestens
Yan Kestens University of Montreal
Margaret Cargo
Margaret Cargo University of Canberra
Anne W. Taylor
Anne W. Taylor University of Adelaide
Kerin O'Dea
Kerin O'Dea University of South Australia
Lise Gauvin
Lise Gauvin University of Montreal
Spencer Moore
Spencer Moore Wageningen University & Research
Lawrence W. Green
Lawrence W. Green University of California, San Francisco
Robert J. Adams
Robert J. Adams Flinders University
Laurette Dubé
Laurette Dubé McGill University
Alicia J. Jenkins
Alicia J. Jenkins University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in social sciences or humanities opens doors to diverse and rewarding careers. Online programs offer flexibility to pursue advanced study while balancing work and personal commitments.

Those interested in clinical and counseling roles may consider a psyd program for a doctorate in psychology. This pathway can prepare graduates for state licensure and professional practice.

For students eager to support families and couples, the lmft programs focus on training in marriage and family therapy, emphasizing real-world skills and ethical practice.

If cost is a concern, exploring online psychology masters options can help you gain valuable credentials without straining your budget. These programs often offer specializations to tailor your studies to your career goals.

For experienced professionals interested in leadership roles, accelerated edd programs online provide a fast-track toward earning an advanced doctoral degree in education, equipping graduates for roles in policy, administration, or academia.

With online options, your pathway in social sciences and humanities is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Daniel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles