World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
60
Citations
11961
World Ranking
1485
National Ranking
110

Mark Daniel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Daniel sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 269 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mark Daniel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Daniel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Daniel is affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, with a substantial focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Transportation, Health, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Their academic output reflects interdisciplinary approaches that intersect health outcomes with environmental and social factors.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Obesity and Health Practices

Recent published papers by Mark Daniel include:

  • Testosterone treatment to prevent or revert type 2 diabetes in men enrolled in a lifestyle programme (T4DM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year, phase 3b trial, 2020, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Prevalence of overweight and obesity, and associations with socio-demographic factors in Kuwait, 2021, BMC Public Health
  • Methods for accounting for neighbourhood self-selection in physical activity and dietary behaviour research: a systematic review, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Operationalising the 20-minute neighbourhood, 2022, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Relative 'greenness' and not availability of public open space buffers stressful life events and longitudinal trajectories of psychological distress, 2021, Health & Place

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Mark Daniel include:

  • Neil T. Coffee
  • Suzanne J. Carroll
  • Margaret Cargo
  • Michael J. Dale
  • Gary Wittert

Mark Daniel's research has been published across several venues, with repeated contributions to the following journals and publishers:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • UNC Libraries
  • Health & Place
  • Journal of Transport & Health
  • BMC Public Health

The scholar's work often interrelates public health concerns with environmental and social determinants, including transportation systems and urban design, reflecting an applied approach to health research. Their contributions include empirical studies on obesity, diabetes, psychological distress, and neighborhood effects on health behaviors, indicating a multidisciplinary research agenda rooted in both health sciences and social sciences.

Best Publications

  • Health inequalities and place: a theoretical conception of neighbourhood.

    Paul Bernard;Rana Charafeddine;Katherine L. Frohlich;Mark Daniel

  • Correlations of Mental Tests with Each Other and with Cognitive Variables Are Highest for Low IQ Groups.

    Douglas K. Detterman;Mark H. Daniel

  • The effect of adherence on the association between depressive symptoms and mortality among HIV-infected individuals first initiating HAART.

    Viviane D. Lima;Josie Geller;David R. Bangsberg;Thomas L. Patterson

  • Testosterone treatment to prevent or revert type 2 diabetes in men enrolled in a lifestyle programme (T4DM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year, phase 3b trial

    Gary Wittert;Karen Bracken;Kristy P Robledo;Mathis Grossmann

  • Sex differences in verbal learning

    Joel H. Kramer;Dean C. Delis;Mark H. Daniel

  • International NGOs and the role of network centrality in humanitarian aid operations: a case study of coordination during the 2000 Mozambique floods.

    Spencer Moore;Eugenia Eng;Mark Daniel

  • Effectiveness of a community-directed ‘healthy lifestyle’ program in a remote Australian Aboriginal community

    Kevin G. Rowley;Mark Daniel;Karen Skinner;Michelle Skinner

  • Use of a New Public Bicycle Share Program in Montreal, Canada

    Daniel Fuller;Lise Gauvin;Yan Kestens;Mark Daniel;Mark Daniel

  • Partnerships and coalitions for community-based research.

    Lawrence Green;Mark Daniel;Lloyd Novick

  • Using experienced activity spaces to measure foodscape exposure.

    Yan Kestens;Alexandre Lebel;Mark Daniel;Marius Thériault

  • Adipose tissue density, estimated adipose lipid fraction and whole body adiposity in male cadavers.

    Martin Ad;Daniel Mz;Drinkwater Dt;Clarys Jp

  • Are accessibility and characteristics of public open spaces associated with a better cardiometabolic health

    Catherine Paquet;Catherine Paquet;Thomas P. Orschulok;Neil T. Coffee;Natasha J. Howard

  • Social capital and core network ties: A validation study of individual-level social capital measures and their association with extra- and intra-neighborhood ties, and self-rated health

    Spencer Moore;Ulf Bockenholt;Mark Daniel;Mark Daniel;Mark Daniel;Katherine Frohlich

  • Effectiveness of community-directed diabetes prevention and control in a rural Aboriginal population in British Columbia, Canada.

    Mark Daniel;Lawrence W Green;Lawrence W Green;Stephen A Marion;Diane Gamble

  • Not all social capital is good capital.

    Spencer Moore;Mark Daniel;Mark Daniel;Lise Gauvin;Laurette Dubé

  • Food environment, walkability, and public open spaces are associated with incident development of cardio-metabolic risk factors in a biomedical cohort.

    Catherine Paquet;Catherine Paquet;Neil T. Coffee;Matthew T. Haren;Natasha J. Howard

  • Neighbourhood socioeconomic status, maternal education and adverse birth outcomes among mothers living near highways

    M Généreux;N Auger;M Goneau;M Daniel

  • Framing the biosocial pathways underlying associations between place and cardiometabolic disease.

    Mark Daniel;Spencer Moore;Yan Kestens

  • Association between activity space exposure to food establishments and individual risk of overweight.

    Yan Kestens;Alexandre Lebel;Alexandre Lebel;Basile Chaix;Christelle Clary

  • After Hurricane Floyd Passed: Investigating the Social Determinants of Disaster Preparedness and Recovery

    Spencer Moore;Mark Daniel;Laura Linnan;Marci Campbell

  • Sustained Drug Use Changes After Hepatitis C Screening and Counseling Among Recently Infected Persons Who Inject Drugs: A Longitudinal Study

    Julie Bruneau;Geng Zang;Michal Abrahamowicz;Didier Jutras-Aswad

Frequent Co-Authors

Yan Kestens
Yan Kestens University of Montreal
Margaret Cargo
Margaret Cargo University of Canberra
Anne W. Taylor
Anne W. Taylor University of Adelaide
Kerin O'Dea
Kerin O'Dea University of South Australia
Lise Gauvin
Lise Gauvin University of Montreal
Spencer Moore
Spencer Moore Wageningen University & Research
Lawrence W. Green
Lawrence W. Green University of California, San Francisco
Robert J. Adams
Robert J. Adams Flinders University
Laurette Dubé
Laurette Dubé McGill University
Alicia J. Jenkins
Alicia J. Jenkins University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in social sciences or humanities opens doors to diverse and rewarding careers. Online programs offer flexibility to pursue advanced study while balancing work and personal commitments.

Those interested in clinical and counseling roles may consider a psyd program for a doctorate in psychology. This pathway can prepare graduates for state licensure and professional practice.

For students eager to support families and couples, the lmft programs focus on training in marriage and family therapy, emphasizing real-world skills and ethical practice.

If cost is a concern, exploring online psychology masters options can help you gain valuable credentials without straining your budget. These programs often offer specializations to tailor your studies to your career goals.

For experienced professionals interested in leadership roles, accelerated edd programs online provide a fast-track toward earning an advanced doctoral degree in education, equipping graduates for roles in policy, administration, or academia.

With online options, your pathway in social sciences and humanities is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Daniel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles