World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
8867
World Ranking
11916
National Ranking
222

Mark de Reuver publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark de Reuver sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 143 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark de Reuver D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark de Reuver sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark de Reuver is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with significant contributions to Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Management Information Systems, Information Systems, and Information Systems and Management.

The scientist's work focuses on several core topics, including:

  • Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Service and Product Innovation
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

Mark de Reuver has published multiple papers, some of which have gained notable attention within the academic community. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Workplace literacy skills-how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology," 2022, Journal of Documentation
  • "The Role of Ecosystem Data Governance in Adoption of Data Platforms by Internet-of-Things Data Providers: Case of Dutch Horticulture Industry," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
  • "Why open government data initiatives fail to achieve their objectives: categorizing and prioritizing barriers through a global survey," 2021, Transforming Government People Process and Policy
  • "Digital platforms and responsible innovation: expanding value sensitive design to overcome ontological uncertainty," 2020, Ethics and Information Technology
  • "Business Data Sharing through Data Marketplaces: A Systematic Literature Review," 2021, Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research

The researcher frequently collaborates with other academics, including Antragama Ewa Abbas, Anneke Zuiderwijk, Wirawan Agahari, Hosea Ofe, and Geerten van de Kaa.

Publication venues where Mark de Reuver has contributed frequently include:

  • Electronic Markets
  • IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
  • Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
  • Technovation
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology)

Best Publications

  • The digital platform: a research agenda

    Mark de Reuver;Carsten Sørensen;Rahul C. Basole

  • The digital platform: a research agenda

    Mark de Reuver;Carsten Sørensen;Rahul C. Basole

  • Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs?

    Harry Bouwman;Shahrokh Nikou;Mark de Reuver

  • The impact of digitalization on business models

    Harry Bouwman;Shahrokh Nikou;Francisco Jose Molina-Castillo;Mark de Reuver

  • BUSINESS MODEL ROADMAPPING: A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO COME FROM AN EXISTING TO A DESIRED BUSINESS MODEL

    Mark De Reuver;Harry Bouwman;Harry Bouwman;Timber Haaker

  • Designing viable business models for context-aware mobile services

    Mark de Reuver;Timber Haaker

  • Conceptualizing the STOF Model

    H. Bouwman;H. Bouwman;E. Faber;T. Haaker;Björn Kijl

  • Mobile customer segmentation based on smartphone measurement

    Fadly Hamka;Harry Bouwman;Mark De Reuver;Maarten Kroesen

  • Business model dynamics: a case survey

    Mark de Reuver;Harry Bouwman;Ian MacInnes

  • Business model stress testing: A practical approach to test the robustness of a business model

    Timber Haaker;Harry Bouwman;Wil Janssen;Mark de Reuver

  • Governance mechanisms for mobile service innovation in value networks

    Mark de Reuver;Harry Bouwman;Harry Bouwman

  • eHealth adoption factors in medical hospitals: A focus on the Netherlands.

    Sander Faber;Marina van Geenhuizen;Mark de Reuver

  • Can privacy concerns for insurance of connected cars be compensated

    Sebastian Derikx;Mark de Reuver;Maarten Kroesen

  • Digital healthcare technology adoption by elderly people: A capability approach model

    Shahrokh Nikou;Wirawan Agahari;Wally J. W. Keijzer-Broers;Mark de Reuver

  • Domestication of smartphones and mobile applications: A quantitative mixed-method study:

    Mark de Reuver;Shahrokh Nikou;Harry Bouwman;Harry Bouwman

  • Dealing with self-report bias in mobile Internet acceptance and usage studies

    Mark de Reuver;Harry Bouwman

  • Business models dynamics for start-ups and innovating e-businesses

    Mark de Reuver;Harry Bouwman;Ian MacInnes

  • Serving the poor: Multisided mobile service platforms, openness, competition, collaboration and the struggle for leadership

    Tina George Karippacheril;Fatemeh Nikayin;Mark De Reuver;Harry Bouwman

  • Mobile business models: organizational and financial design issues that matter

    Mark de Reuver;Harry Bouwman;Timber Haaker

  • The Role of Ecosystem Data Governance in Adoption of Data Platforms by Internet-of-Things Data Providers: Case of Dutch Horticulture Industry

    Fabian De Prieëlle;Mark De Reuver;Jafar Rezaei

  • From eParticipation to mobile participation: Designing a service platform and business model for mobile participation

    Mark de Reuver;Stefan Stein;J. Felix Hampe

  • Governing Mobile Service Innovation in Converging Value Networks

    M. de Reuver;H. Bouwman

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry Bouwman
Harry Bouwman Delft University of Technology
Christer Carlsson
Christer Carlsson Åbo Akademi University
Carsten Sørensen
Carsten Sørensen London School of Economics and Political Science
Marijn Janssen
Marijn Janssen Delft University of Technology
Elena Simona Lohan
Elena Simona Lohan Tampere University
Jafar Rezaei
Jafar Rezaei Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens doors to related fields with exciting online degree and certification options. Many students wonder, for example, can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes—several accredited universities now offer flexible online programs in physics and other STEM areas.

For those interested in tech-focused and high-demand careers, affordable choices are also available. If data is your passion, consider the cheapest data science degree options to gain job-ready skills without high tuition costs. Similarly, students seeking engineering roles can benefit from choosing among the best online electrical engineering programs USA.

Not all tech careers require a four-year degree. There are easy certifications to get that still pay well, covering fields like IT support, cybersecurity, and software testing. These fast-track options can boost your resume and prepare you for entry-level jobs in a short time.

Best Scientists Citing Mark de Reuver

Trending Scientists