World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
13451
World Ranking
5424
National Ranking
585

Mark Emmerson publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Emmerson sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark Emmerson D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Emmerson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Emmerson is affiliated with Queen's University Belfast in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Emmerson's work covers multiple subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecological Modeling.

The main topics explored by Emmerson include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Plant and Animal Studies, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics.

Emmerson has contributed to a variety of scholarly publications with notable recent papers such as:

  • Individual species provide multifaceted contributions to the stability of ecosystems (2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution)
  • Agriculture intensification reduces plant taxonomic and functional diversity across European arable systems (2020, Functional Ecology)
  • Quantifying large-scale ecosystem stability with remote sensing data (2020, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation)
  • Land management shapes drought responses of dominant soil microbial taxa across grasslands (2024, Nature Communications)
  • Data quantity is more important than its spatial bias for predictive species distribution modelling (2020, PeerJ)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Functional Ecology, Nature Communications, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, and Journal of Applied Ecology.

Throughout their career, Emmerson has collaborated with various coauthors, with frequent partnerships involving Neil Reid, Paul Caplat, Hannah J. White, Jon M. Yearsley, and Dinara Sadykova.

Best Publications

  • Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland

    Flavia Geiger;Jan Bengtsson;Frank Berendse;Wolfgang W. Weisser

  • Body size in ecological networks

    Guy Woodward;Bo Ebenman;Mark Emmerson;Jose M. Montoya;Jose M. Montoya

  • Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions

    William J. Sutherland;Robert P. Freckleton;H. Charles J. Godfray;Steven R. Beissinger

  • Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices

    Vesna Gagic;Ignasio Bartomeus;Tomas Jonsson;Astrid Taylor

  • Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities

    Eric L Berlow;Anje-Margiet Neutel;Joel E Cohen;Peter C de Ruiter

  • MEASUREMENT OF INTERACTION STRENGTH IN NATURE

    J. Timothy Wootton;Mark Emmerson

  • Predator–prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web

    Mark C. Emmerson;Mark C. Emmerson;Dave Raffaelli

  • Temperature, predator-prey interaction strength and population stability

    Björn Christian Rall;Olivera Vucic-Pestic;Roswitha B. Ehnes;Mark Emmerson

  • On the dimensionality of ecological stability

    Ian Donohue;Owen L. Petchey;José M. Montoya;Andrew L. Jackson

  • How Agricultural Intensification Affects Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

    M. Emmerson;M.B. Morales;J.J. Oñate;P. Batáry

  • Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems.

    Mark C. Emmerson;Martin Solan;Chas Emes;David M. Paterson

  • Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: are major surprises inevitable?

    Daniel F. Doak;James A. Estes;Benjamin S. Halpern;Ute Jacob

  • Agricultural intensification and biodiversity partitioning in European landscapes comparing plants, carabids, and birds

    Andreas Flohre;Christina Fischer;Tsipe Aavik;Jan Bengtsson

  • A new look at the relationship between diversity and stability.

    M. Loreau;A. Downing;Mark Emmerson;A. Gonzalez

  • Perturbations to trophic interactions and the stability of complex food webs.

    Eoin J. O'Gorman;Mark C. Emmerson

  • The relationship between agricultural intensification and biological control: experimental tests across Europe.

    Carsten Thies;Sebastian Haenke;Christoph Scherber;Janne Bengtsson

  • Press perturbations and indirect effects in real food webs

    José M. Montoya;José M. Montoya;Guy Woodward;Mark C. Emmerson;Ricard V. Solé

  • Weak interactions, omnivory and emergent food-web properties.

    Mark Emmerson;Jon M. Yearsley

  • Predicting community responses to perturbations in the face of imperfect knowledge and network complexity

    Mark Novak;J. Timothy Wootton;Daniel F. Doak;Mark Emmerson

  • Characterizing Species Interactions to Understand Press Perturbations: What Is the Community Matrix?

    Mark Novak;Justin D. Yeakel;Justin D. Yeakel;Andrew E. Noble;Daniel F. Doak

  • Biodiversity and the stability of ecosystem functioning.

    J. Griffin;E. O’Gorman;Mark Emmerson;S. Jenkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Eoin J. O'Gorman
Eoin J. O'Gorman University of Essex
José M. Montoya
José M. Montoya Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jaimie T. A. Dick
Jaimie T. A. Dick Queen's University Belfast
Jaan Liira
Jaan Liira University of Tartu
Wolfgang W. Weisser
Wolfgang W. Weisser Technical University of Munich
Teja Tscharntke
Teja Tscharntke University of Göttingen
Riccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Sönke Eggers
Sönke Eggers Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Manuel B. Morales
Manuel B. Morales Autonomous University of Madrid
Frank Berendse
Frank Berendse Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can lead to diverse career paths, and many students are also interested in flexible online healthcare degrees. If you’re considering advancing in nursing, there are several fast-track academic options. Programs like rn to bsn 6 months offer accelerated routes for registered nurses seeking a bachelor’s degree while balancing work and study.

For those holding an associate degree in nursing, the asn to np pathway is a bridge to becoming a nurse practitioner, opening doors to advanced clinical and leadership roles. Meanwhile, career changers without a previous nursing background might consider online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses, which enable entry into the nursing profession with a Master’s degree.

Choosing the right school is crucial. Resources comparing top rated online nursing schools wgu can help you decide which institution fits your academic and professional goals. Whether your interests are in the sciences or healthcare, these flexible degree programs offer rewarding and evolving career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Emmerson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles