What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Geometry
- Thermodynamics
- Mechanics
Richard M. Lueptow focuses on Mechanics, Classical mechanics, Granular material, Flow and Couette flow.
He does research in Mechanics, focusing on Particle-laden flows specifically.
Richard M. Lueptow interconnects Boundary layer thickness, Turbulence, Boundary layer and Potential flow around a circular cylinder in the investigation of issues within Classical mechanics.
His Granular material research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Heap, Statistical physics, Percolation and Particle size.
His work carried out in the field of Flow brings together such families of science as Angle of repose, Convection and Optics.
Richard M. Lueptow combines subjects such as Taylor number, Vortex and Reynolds number with his study of Couette flow.
His most cited work include:
- Photoreactive TiO2/Carbon Nanotube Composites: Synthesis and Reactivity (475 citations)
- Spatio-temporal character of non-wavy and wavy Taylor–Couette flow (126 citations)
- Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes. (125 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Mechanics, Granular material, Classical mechanics, Flow and Discrete element method.
His study looks at the intersection of Mechanics and topics like Cylinder with Boundary layer.
His Granular material research incorporates elements of Heap, Shear rate, Volumetric flow rate, Flow and Particle size.
The various areas that Richard M. Lueptow examines in his Flow study include Rotation and Optics.
His Classical mechanics research includes themes of Potential flow around a circular cylinder and Boundary layer thickness, Turbulence.
His research in Discrete element method intersects with topics in Geometry, Length scale and Advection.
He most often published in these fields:
- Mechanics (51.75%)
- Granular material (17.54%)
- Classical mechanics (15.79%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Mechanics (51.75%)
- Discrete element method (10.53%)
- Granular material (17.54%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Richard M. Lueptow mainly focuses on Mechanics, Discrete element method, Granular material, Range and Heap.
His Mechanics research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Shear rate and Shear.
His work deals with themes such as Vector field, Conical surface, Geometry, Mixing and Particle size, which intersect with Discrete element method.
Richard M. Lueptow has included themes like Continuum Modeling, Volumetric flow rate, Surface layer, Advection and Scaling in his Granular material study.
His study on Heap also encompasses disciplines like
- Bounded function which intersects with area such as Theoretical computer science, Aspect ratio and Cylinder,
- Particle image velocimetry, Layer thickness and Estimation theory most often made with reference to Particulate flow.
His Buoyancy research integrates issues from Flow, Percolation and Particle size ratio.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Modeling Segregation in Granular Flows. (27 citations)
- Simulation and modeling of segregating rods in quasi‐2D bounded heap flow (27 citations)
- Asymmetric concentration dependence of segregation fluxes in granular flows (25 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Thermodynamics
- Geometry
- Mechanics
His primary areas of investigation include Mechanics, Discrete element method, Granular material, Heap and Flow conditions.
His research on Mechanics often connects related areas such as Advection.
His Heap research incorporates themes from Kinematics and Bounded function.
His research integrates issues of Overburden pressure and Buoyancy in his study of Flow conditions.
His work in Buoyancy addresses issues such as Gravitational acceleration, which are connected to fields such as Particle size.
His Flow research incorporates themes from Scaling law, Sink and Particle size ratio.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
