World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
42
Citations
5716
World Ranking
6716
National Ranking
1828

Benjamin J. Glasser publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin J. Glasser sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 157 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Benjamin J. Glasser D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin J. Glasser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin J. Glasser is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans primarily in the field of engineering, with a focus on computational mechanics, biomedical engineering, and mechanical engineering among other related subfields.

Their work addresses several main topics including:

  • Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Cyclone separators and fluid dynamics
  • Innovative microfluidic and catalytic techniques innovation
  • Mineral processing and grinding
  • Heat and mass transfer in porous media
  • Particle dynamics in fluid flows
  • Process optimization and integration

Benjamin J. Glasser has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed papers, some of the more recent publications include:

  • Optimization of key energy and performance metrics for drug product manufacturing (2022), published in International Journal of Pharmaceutics
  • DEM analysis of the thermal treatment of granular materials in a rotary drum equipped with baffles (2022), published in Chemical Engineering Science
  • Vibratory mixing of pharmaceutical powders on a single-tablet-scale (2021), published in Powder Technology
  • Scale-up and flow behavior of cohesive granular material in a four-bladed mixer: effect of system and particle size (2021), published in Advanced Powder Technology
  • Scale up of heat transfer for dry granular material in a cylindrical bladed mixer (2021), published in Powder Technology

Their frequent coauthors include Johannes Khinast, Prin Chaksmithanont, Carlin Leung, Charles D. Papageorgiou, and Justin L. Quon.

Publications by Benjamin J. Glasser have appeared predominantly in the following venues:

  • Powder Technology
  • Chemical Engineering Science
  • Advanced Powder Technology
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics
  • Particulate Science And Technology

The research of Benjamin J. Glasser displays a strong interdisciplinary approach, integrating computational mechanics methods with applications in biomedical engineering and process engineering. Their contributions particularly emphasize the behavior and treatment of granular materials in various industrial and pharmaceutical contexts.

Best Publications

  • Powder technology in the pharmaceutical industry: the need to catch up fast

    Fernando J Muzzio;Troy Shinbrot;Benjamin J Glasser

  • Large-scale powder mixer simulations using massively parallel GPUarchitectures

    Charles A. Radeke;Benjamin J. Glasser;Johannes G. Khinast

  • Impact of drying on the catalyst profile in supported impregnation catalysts

    Azzeddine Lekhal;Benjamin J. Glasser;Johannes G. Khinast

  • Mixing characteristics of wet granular matter in a bladed mixer

    Stefan Radl;Eva Kalvoda;Benjamin J. Glasser;Johannes G. Khinast

  • Discrete element simulation of free flowing grains in a four‐bladed mixer

    Brenda Remy;Johannes G. Khinast;Benjamin J. Glasser

  • Scale dependence, correlations, and fluctuations of stresses in rapid granular flows

    Benjamin Glasser;I. Goldhirsch

  • DEM simulation of continuous tablet coating: Effects of tablet shape and fill level on inter-tablet coating variability

    Daniele Suzzi;Gregor Toschkoff;Stefan Radl;Daniel Machold

  • Granular flow and Segregation in a four-bladed mixer

    Stephen L. Conway;Azzeddine Lekhal;Johannes G. Khinast;Benjamin J. Glasser

  • The effect of mixer properties and fill level on granular flow in a bladed mixer

    Brenda Remy;Benjamin J. Glasser;Johannes G. Khinast

  • Polydisperse granular flows in a bladed mixer: Experiments and simulations of cohesionless spheres

    Brenda Remy;Johannes G. Khinast;Benjamin J. Glasser

  • All the Brazil nuts are not on top: Vibration induced granular size segregation of binary, ternary and multi-sized mixtures

    Matthew J. Metzger;Brenda Remy;Benjamin J. Glasser

  • One- and two-dimensional travelling wave solutions in gas-fluidized beds

    B. J. Glasser;I. G. Kevrekidis;S. Sundaresan

  • Effect of particle size distribution on segregation in vibrated systems

    Anchal Jain;Matthew J. Metzger;Benjamin J. Glasser

  • From Bubbles to Clusters in Fluidized Beds

    B. J. Glasser;S. Sundaresan;I. G. Kevrekidis

  • A parametric investigation of impregnation and drying of supported catalysts

    Xue Liu;Johannes G. Khinast;Benjamin J. Glasser

  • Impact of agitated drying on crystal morphology: KCl–water system

    A. Lekhal;K.P. Girard;M.A. Brown;S. Kiang

  • Predicting feeder performance based on material flow properties

    Yifan Wang;Tianyi Li;Fernando J. Muzzio;Benjamin J. Glasser

  • Experiments and simulations of cohesionless particles with varying roughness in a bladed mixer

    Brenda Remy;Thomas M. Canty;Johannes G. Khinast;Benjamin J. Glasser

  • Influence of pH and ionic strength on the metal profile of impregnation catalysts

    Azzeddine Lekhal;Benjamin J. Glasser;Johannes G. Khinast

  • Shear and flow behavior of pharmaceutical blends — Method comparison study

    Alisa Vasilenko;Benjamin J. Glasser;Fernando J. Muzzio

  • Fully developed travelling wave solutions and bubble formation in fluidized beds

    B. J. Glasser;I. G. Kevrekidis;S. Sundaresan

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Khinast
Johannes Khinast Graz University of Technology
Fernando J. Muzzio
Fernando J. Muzzio Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Troy Shinbrot
Troy Shinbrot Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
David Glasser
David Glasser University of South Africa
Diane Hildebrandt
Diane Hildebrandt University of South Africa
Alberto M. Cuitiño
Alberto M. Cuitiño Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sankaran Sundaresan
Sankaran Sundaresan Princeton University
Ioannis G. Kevrekidis
Ioannis G. Kevrekidis Johns Hopkins University
Chuan-Yu Wu
Chuan-Yu Wu University of Surrey
Timothy A. G. Langrish
Timothy A. G. Langrish University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin J. Glasser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles