World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 42 6708 6477 1827 1696 157 5781

Christine M. Hrenya publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christine M. Hrenya between 1993 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christine M. Hrenya published across 31 years, from 1993 to 2023, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 8 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications
1993 2023

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christine M. Hrenya: publications per year, 1993 to 2023
Year Publications
1993 3
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 6
2003 2
2004 3
2005 6
2006 6
2007 7
2008 5
2009 4
2010 8
2011 11
2012 12
2013 8
2014 8
2015 5
2016 15
2017 19
2018 5
2019 4
2020 3
2021 3
2022 6
2023 2
Total 159
Download as CSV

Christine M. Hrenya publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine M. Hrenya sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 157 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457 157
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Christine M. Hrenya D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine M. Hrenya sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426 42
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Christine M. Hrenya is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States and works primarily in the field of engineering.

Their research focuses on computational mechanics, with notable contributions in subfields such as computational mechanics, ocean engineering, mechanical engineering, materials chemistry, and environmental engineering.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
  • Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
  • Mineral Processing and Grinding
  • Material Dynamics and Properties

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Powder Technology
  • Chemical Engineering Science
  • AIChE Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Key papers authored or coauthored by Christine M. Hrenya include:

  • "An error-controlled adaptive time-stepping method for particle advancement in coupled CFD-DEM simulations," 2020, Powder Technology
  • "Toward general regime maps for cohesive-particle flows: Force versus energy-based descriptions and relevant dimensionless groups," 2021, AIChE Journal
  • "Experimental validation of the extraction of a particle-particle cohesion model (square-force) from simple bulk measurements (defluidization in a rheometer)," 2022, Chemical Engineering Science
  • "Very small-scale, segregating-fluidized-bed experiments: A dataset for CFD-DEM validation and uncertainty quantification," 2022, AIChE Journal
  • "Heat and momentum transfer to a particle in a laminar boundary layer," 2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Christine M. Hrenya frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Casey Q. LaMarche
  • Hariswaran Sitaraman
  • Deepthi Vaidhynathan
  • Thomas Häuser
  • Jordan Musser

Best Publications

  • Effects of particle‐phase turbulence in gas‐solid flows

    Christine M. Hrenya;Jennifer L. Sinclair

  • Comparison of soft-sphere models to measurements of collision properties during normal impacts

    A.B. Stevens;C.M. Hrenya

  • Enskog theory for polydisperse granular mixtures. I. Navier-Stokes order transport.

    Vicente Garzó;James W. Dufty;Christine M. Hrenya

  • Kinetic temperatures for a granular mixture

    Steven R. Dahl;Christine M. Hrenya;Vicente Garzó;James W. Dufty

  • The Clustering Instability in Rapid Granular and Gas-Solid Flows

    William D. Fullmer;Christine M. Hrenya

  • Comparison of low Reynolds number k−ε turbulence models in predicting fully developed pipe flow

    C.M. Hrenya;E.J. Bolio;D. Chakrabarti;J.L. Sinclair

  • Enskog kinetic theory for monodisperse gas–solid flows

    V. Garzó;Sudheer Tenneti;Shankar Subramaniam;C. M. Hrenya

  • Experimental segregation profiles in bubbling gas‐fluidized beds

    Gustavo G. Joseph;José Leboreiro;Christine M. Hrenya;Andrea R. Stevens

  • Enskog theory for polydisperse granular mixtures. II. Sonine polynomial approximation.

    Vicente Garzó;Christine M. Hrenya;James W. Dufty

  • Size segregation in gas–solid fluidized beds with continuous size distributions

    S.R. Dahl;C.M. Hrenya

  • On the role of non-equipartition in the dynamics of rapidly flowing granular mixtures

    J. E. Galvin;S. R. Dahl;C. M. Hrenya

  • Simulations of heat transfer to solid particles flowing through an array of heated tubes

    A. B. Morris;Zhiwen Ma;S. Pannala;C. M. Hrenya

  • Direct numerical simulation of gas–solid suspensions at moderate Reynolds number: Quantifying the coupling between hydrodynamic forces and particle velocity fluctuations

    S. Tenneti;R. Garg;C.M. Hrenya;R.O. Fox

  • Cluster characteristics of Geldart group B particles in a pilot-scale CFB riser. II. Polydisperse systems

    Jia Wei Chew;Roy Hays;John G. Findlay;Ted M. Knowlton

  • Simulations of a binary-sized mixture of inelastic grains in rapid shear flow.

    R. Clelland;C. M. Hrenya

  • Quantitative assessment of fine-grid kinetic-theory-based predictions of mean-slip in unbounded fluidization

    William D. Fullmer;Christine M. Hrenya

  • A conductive heat transfer model for particle flows over immersed surfaces

    A. B. Morris;S. Pannala;Zhiwen Ma;C. M. Hrenya

  • Axial segregation in bubbling gas-fluidized beds with Gaussian and lognormal distributions of Geldart Group B particles

    Jia Wei Chew;Jeffrey R. Wolz;Christine M. Hrenya

  • The influence of binary drag laws on simulations of species segregation in gas-fluidized beds

    José Leboreiro;Gustavo G. Joseph;Christine M. Hrenya;Dale M. Snider

  • Method of quantifying surface roughness for accurate adhesive force predictions

    Casey Q. LaMarche;Stuart Leadley;Peiyuan Liu;Kevin M. Kellogg

  • Discrete-particle simulations of cohesive granular flow using a square-well potential

    Michael W. Weber;David K. Hoffman;Christine M. Hrenya

  • Computational Granular Dynamics - Models and Algorithms, Thorsten Pöschel and Thomas Schwager, Springer, 2005

    Christine Hrenya

Frequent Co-Authors

Jia Wei Chew
Jia Wei Chew Chalmers University of Technology
Robert H. Davis
Robert H. Davis University of Colorado Boulder
Alan W. Weimer
Alan W. Weimer University of Colorado Boulder
Rodney O. Fox
Rodney O. Fox Iowa State University
Sreekanth Pannala
Sreekanth Pannala Saudi Arabia Basic Industries (United States)
Ricky D. Wildman
Ricky D. Wildman University of Nottingham
Sankaran Sundaresan
Sankaran Sundaresan Princeton University
John R. Grace
John R. Grace University of British Columbia
Michael S. Detamore
Michael S. Detamore University of Oklahoma
Jonathan M. Huntley
Jonathan M. Huntley Loughborough University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for skilled professionals in Engineering and Technology continues to grow, students are increasingly considering flexible learning options. Many accredited institutions now offer 6 week college courses online that allow learners to complete foundational requirements at an accelerated pace. This flexibility is ideal for those who need to balance work or other obligations while advancing their education.

Beyond traditional engineering disciplines, fast-tracked degrees have gained popularity in related fields. Programs such as the fastest finance degree and accelerated MBA offer streamlined curriculums that prepare students for business, finance, and management roles within the tech industry.

For those interested in legal support roles in technology firms, there are options like the paralegal accelerated program. These programs provide the skills necessary to navigate intellectual property and regulatory compliance in technical environments.

Combining online learning with accelerated programs can help you quickly expand your career pathways in the dynamic fields of engineering and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Christine M. Hrenya

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles