World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
17870
World Ranking
6290
National Ranking
128

Vesna Jelic publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vesna Jelic sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 172 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Vesna Jelic D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vesna Jelic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vesna Jelic is affiliated with the Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden. Their research spans several fields within medicine and neuroscience, with a notable focus on neurodegenerative diseases and cognitive disorders.

The primary fields of study in their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these broad categories, Jelic's subfields of study are detailed as:

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neurology
  • Physiology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

The scientist has contributed to research on several major topics, including:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Recent publications by Vesna Jelic cover various aspects of neurodegenerative disorders and their clinical evaluation. Selected papers include:

  • "Measures of resting state EEG rhythms for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations of an expert panel," 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Progression of Behavioral Disturbances and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients With Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia," 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • "Incidence of Syndromes Associated With Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration in 9 European Countries," 2023, JAMA Neurology
  • "Differential early subcortical involvement in genetic FTD within the GENFI cohort," 2021, NeuroImage Clinical
  • "Characterizing the Clinical Features and Atrophy Patterns of MAPT-Related Frontotemporal Dementia With Disease Progression Modeling," 2021, Neurology

Jelic frequently collaborates with several co-authors, indicating active participation in multidisciplinary research teams. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Caroline Graff
  • Markus Otto
  • Barbara Borroni
  • James B. Rowe
  • Martina Bocchetta

Publication venues where Vesna Jelic has made multiple contributions encompass:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Neurology
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Brain Communications

Best Publications

  • Mild cognitive impairment--beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment.

    B. Winblad;K. Palmer;Miia Kivipelto;V. Jelic

  • Mild cognitive impairment: A concept in evolution

    Ronald C. Petersen;Barbara Caracciolo;Barbara Caracciolo;Carol Brayne;Serge Gauthier

  • Decreased EEG synchronization in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

    T. Koenig;L. Prichep;T. Dierks;D. Hubl

  • Presymptomatic cognitive and neuroanatomical changes in genetic frontotemporal dementia in the Genetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI) study: a cross-sectional analysis

    Jonathan D Rohrer;Jennifer M Nicholas;Jennifer M Nicholas;David M Cash;John van Swieten

  • Quantitative electroencephalography in mild cognitive impairment: longitudinal changes and possible prediction of Alzheimer's disease

    V Jelic;S E Johansson;O Almkvist;M Shigeta

  • Discrimination of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment by equivalent EEG sources: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

    C Huang;L.-O Wahlund;T Dierks;P Julin

  • Impaired cerebral glucose metabolism and cognitive functioning predict deterioration in mild cognitive impairment.

    E Arnáiz;V Jelic;O Almkvist;L O Wahlund

  • Application and comparison of classification algorithms for recognition of Alzheimer's disease in electrical brain activity (EEG).

    Christoph Lehmann;Thomas Koenig;Vesna Jelic;Leslie Prichep;Leslie Prichep

  • Spatial pattern of cerebral glucose metabolism (PET) correlates with localization of intracerebral EEG-generators in Alzheimer's disease.

    Thomas Dierks;Thomas Dierks;Vesna Jelic;Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui;Lars-Olof Wahlund

  • A critical discussion of the role of neuroimaging in mild cognitive impairment.

    Henrike Wolf;Vesna Jelic;Hermann-Josef Gertz;Agneta Nordberg

  • Quantitative electroencephalography power and coherence in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

    Vesna Jelic;Masahiro Shigeta;Per Julin;Ove Almkvist

  • Neurofilament light chain: a biomarker for genetic frontotemporal dementia.

    Lieke H. Meeter;Elise G. Dopper;Lize C. Jiskoot;Raquel Sanchez‐Valle

  • Clinical trials in mild cognitive impairment: lessons for the future

    Vesna Jelic;Miia Kivipelto;Bengt Winblad

  • Measures of resting state EEG rhythms for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations of an expert panel

    Claudio Babiloni;Xianghong Arakaki;Hamed Azami;Karim Bennys

  • Quantitative EEG power and synchronization correlate with Alzheimer's disease CSF biomarkers

    Una Smailovic;Thomas Koenig;Ingemar Kåreholt;Thomas Andersson

  • EEG Theta Power Is an Early Marker of Cognitive Decline in Dementia due to Alzheimer's Disease.

    Christian Sandøe Musaeus;Knut Engedal;Peter Høgh;Vesna Jelic

  • Serum neurofilament light chain in genetic frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal, multicentre cohort study

    Emma L van der Ende;Lieke H Meeter;Jackie M Poos;Jessica L Panman

  • Encapsulated cell biodelivery of nerve growth factor to the Basal forebrain in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    Maria Eriksdotter-Jönhagen;Bengt Linderoth;Goran Lind;Layth Aladellie

  • Impairment of neocortical metabolism predicts progression in Alzheimer's disease

    K. Herholz;A. Nordberg;Eric Salmon;D. Perani

  • Central auditory function in early Alzheimer's disease and in mild cognitive impairment

    Esma Idrizbegovic;Christina Hederstierna;Martin Dahlquist;Charlotta Kämpfe Nordström

  • Cortical sources of resting EEG rhythms in mild cognitive impairment and subjective memory complaint.

    Claudio Babiloni;Pieter Jelle Visser;Giovanni Frisoni;Peter Paul De Deyn

  • Imaging in-vivo tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease with THK5317 PET in a multimodal paradigm

    Konstantinos Chiotis;Laure Saint-Aubert;Irina Savitcheva;Vesna Jelic

  • Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele decreases functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease as measured by EEG coherence

    Vesna Jelic;Per Julin;Masahiro Shigeta;Agneta Nordberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Agneta Nordberg
Agneta Nordberg Karolinska University Hospital
Dag Aarsland
Dag Aarsland King's College London
Caroline Graff
Caroline Graff Karolinska University Hospital
Mario Masellis
Mario Masellis Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Maria Eriksdotter
Maria Eriksdotter Karolinska Institute
Jonathan D. Rohrer
Jonathan D. Rohrer University College London
Thomas Dierks
Thomas Dierks University of Bern
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Alessandro Padovani
Alessandro Padovani University of Brescia
Barbara Borroni
Barbara Borroni University of Brescia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to a variety of online degree options and rewarding career pathways in psychology, healthcare, and research. For those interested in clinical practice, there are online psyd programs that provide advanced training in psychology and counseling. These programs are designed for students seeking to become licensed psychologists and offer the flexibility of online learning.

If you're considering a career in therapy, accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited pathways can lead to professional licensure and direct client work. These programs often offer accelerated formats, allowing you to complete your education more efficiently.

Time and investment are important considerations. For those looking to earn credentials quickly, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online are available in several fields, including psychology and sciences. Such pathways can help you transition to the workforce faster or prepare for graduate study.

Finally, when planning your future, it makes sense to explore 4 year degrees that pay well. These programs can offer strong returns on investment and set the foundation for successful careers in neuroscience-related sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Vesna Jelic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles