World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander L.N. van Nuijs

Alexander L.N. van Nuijs

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 49 5214 4993 75 72 139 9655

Alexander L.N. van Nuijs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alexander L.N. van Nuijs between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alexander L.N. van Nuijs published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 13.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2021. 18 of the 254 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2021. 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 2 publications
2008 2026

254 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alexander L.N. van Nuijs: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 5
2009 5
2010 2
2011 8
2012 4
2013 4
2014 15
2015 13
2016 16
2017 14
2018 14
2019 15
2020 14
2021 38
2022 33
2023 18
2024 18
2025 16
2026 2
Total 254
Download as CSV

Alexander L.N. van Nuijs publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander L.N. van Nuijs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 139 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 139
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Alexander L.N. van Nuijs D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander L.N. van Nuijs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273 49
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Alexander L.N. van Nuijs is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium and specializes in research primarily within the field of Medicine, encompassing 107 publications. Their work is notably concentrated on several subfields, including Infectious Diseases, Toxicology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Molecular Biology, and Spectroscopy.

Their research covers a variety of topics, with a particular focus on Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis, SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing, Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies, Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects, Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals, and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact.

Alexander L.N. van Nuijs has published extensively in certain scientific journals and platforms. Frequent publication venues include The Science of The Total Environment, Water Research, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Drug Testing and Analysis, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Recent selected papers exemplifying their research focus include:

  • Wastewater-Based Epidemiology: Global Collaborative to Maximize Contributions in the Fight Against COVID-19, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Targeting ferroptosis protects against experimental (multi)organ dysfunction and death, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Factors influencing SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater up to the sampling stage: A systematic review, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Monitoring psychoactive substance use at six European festivals through wastewater and pooled urine analysis, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Current and future perspectives for wastewater-based epidemiology as a monitoring tool for pharmaceutical use, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment

Their frequent coauthors demonstrate collaborative networks that include Adrian Covaci, Tim Boogaerts, Lubertus Bijlsma, Lidia Belova, and Elias Iturrospe. These collaborations reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their work in environmental health and toxicology.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of uncertainties associated with the determination of community drug use through the measurement of sewage drug biomarkers.

    Sara Castiglioni;Lubertus Bijlsma;Adrian Covaci;Erik Emke

  • Comparing illicit drug use in 19 European cities through sewage analysis.

    Kevin V. Thomas;Lubertus Bijlsma;Sara Castiglioni;Adrian Covaci

  • Sewage epidemiology ― A real-time approach to estimate the consumption of illicit drugs in Brussels, Belgium

    Alexander L.N. van Nuijs;Jean-François Mougel;Isabela Tarcomnicu;Lieven Bervoets

  • Illicit drug consumption estimations derived from wastewater analysis: a critical review.

    Alexander L N van Nuijs;Sara Castiglioni;Isabela Tarcomnicu;Cristina Postigo

  • Analysis of cocaine and its principal metabolites in waste and surface water using solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography–ion trap tandem mass spectrometry

    Adriana Gheorghe;Adriana Gheorghe;Alexander van Nuijs;Bert Pecceu;Lieven Bervoets

  • Spatial differences and temporal changes in illicit drug use in Europe quantified by wastewater analysis.

    Christoph Ort;Alexander L. N. van Nuijs;Jean-Daniel Berset;Lubertus Bijlsma

  • Wastewater-Based Epidemiology: Global Collaborative to Maximize Contributions in the Fight Against COVID-19.

    Aaron Bivins;Devin North;Arslan Ahmad;Warish Ahmed

  • Critical review on the stability of illicit drugs in sewers and wastewater samples

    Ann-Kathrin McCall;Richard Bade;Juliet Kinyua;Foon Yin Lai

  • Spatio‐temporal assessment of illicit drug use at large scale: evidence from 7 years of international wastewater monitoring

    Iria González-Mariño;Iria González-Mariño;Jose Antonio Baz-Lomba;Nikiforos A. Alygizakis;Maria Jesús Andrés-Costa

  • Analysis of the flame retardant metabolites bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCPP) and diphenyl phosphate (DPP) in urine using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

    E. M. Cooper;A. Covaci;A. L. N. van Nuijs;T. F. Webster

  • Comparison of pharmaceutical, illicit drug, alcohol, nicotine and caffeine levels in wastewater with sale, seizure and consumption data for 8 European cities

    Jose Antonio Baz-Lomba;Jose Antonio Baz-Lomba;Stefania Salvatore;Emma Gracia-Lor;Richard Bade

  • Cocaine and metabolites in waste and surface water across Belgium.

    Alexander L.N. van Nuijs;Bert Pecceu;Laetitia Theunis;Nathalie Dubois

  • Spatial and temporal variations in the occurrence of cocaine and benzoylecgonine in waste- and surface water from Belgium and removal during wastewater treatment.

    Alexander L.N. van Nuijs;Bert Pecceu;Laetitia Theunis;Nathalie Dubois

  • Can cocaine use be evaluated through analysis of wastewater? A nation‐wide approach conducted in Belgium

    Alexander L N van Nuijs;Bert Pecceu;Laetitia Theunis;Nathalie Dubois

  • Wastewater-based epidemiology to assess pan-European pesticide exposure.

    Nikolaos I. Rousis;Emma Gracia-Lor;Emma Gracia-Lor;Ettore Zuccato;Richard Bade;Richard Bade

  • Analysis of drugs of abuse in wastewater by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

    Alexander L. N. van Nuijs;Isabela Tarcomnicu;Lieven Bervoets;Ronny Blust

  • The stability of illicit drugs and metabolites in wastewater, an important issue for sewage epidemiology?

    Alexander L.N. van Nuijs;Karim Abdellati;Lieven Bervoets;Ronny Blust

  • Estimation of caffeine intake from analysis of caffeine metabolites in wastewater

    Emma Gracia-Lor;Emma Gracia-Lor;Nikolaos I. Rousis;Ettore Zuccato;Richard Bade

  • Optimization and validation of a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of 13 top-prescribed pharmaceuticals in influent wastewater

    Alexander L. N. van Nuijs;Isabela Tarcomnicu;Ward Simons;Lieven Bervoets

  • Application of a sewage-based approach to assess the use of ten illicit drugs in four Chinese megacities

    Usman Khan;Alexander L.N. van Nuijs;Jing Li;Walid Maho

  • Application of hydrophilic interaction chromatography for the analysis of polar contaminants in food and environmental samples

    Alexander L.N. van Nuijs;Isabela Tarcomnicu;Adrian Covaci

  • Cocaïne and metabolites in waste and surface water across Belgium - a monitoring study

    Alexander Van Nuijs;Bert Pecceu;A. Gheorghe;Laetitia Theunis

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian Covaci
Adrian Covaci University of Antwerp
Hugo Neels
Hugo Neels University of Antwerp
Kevin V. Thomas
Kevin V. Thomas University of Queensland
Félix Hernández
Félix Hernández Jaume I University
Sara Castiglioni
Sara Castiglioni Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern
Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern University of Bath
Pim de Voogt
Pim de Voogt University of Amsterdam
Lubertus Bijlsma
Lubertus Bijlsma Jaume I University
Christoph Ort
Christoph Ort Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Lieven Bervoets
Lieven Bervoets University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many learners start with an online general studies bachelor degree cheap to build foundational knowledge while managing costs effectively. This flexible route allows for exploring various subjects before specializing.

If you're seeking a more accessible entry point, consider programs listed under what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get. These degrees often focus on practical skills and offer a smoother path to graduation, which can be appealing for those balancing education with other commitments.

Specialized fields like geoscience and geology are closely tied to Environmental Sciences. Students can pursue focused careers via online geology degrees, which provide in-depth understanding of Earth processes critical to environmental work.

Another important branch is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), vital for environmental data analysis. Top programs for those interested can be found among the best GIS undergraduate programs. These degrees equip students with valuable technical skills for mapping and spatial analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander L.N. van Nuijs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles