World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Chemistry
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
80
Citations
27436
World Ranking
951
National Ranking
27

Chemistry

D-Index
77
Citations
23924
World Ranking
3969
National Ranking
95

Pim de Voogt publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pim de Voogt sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 316 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Pim de Voogt D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pim de Voogt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Pim de Voogt is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has a research focus primarily situated in Environmental Science. Their work encompasses various subfields, including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Toxicology, Environmental Chemistry, and Epidemiology.

Their research covers multiple topics such as Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis, Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact, HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk, Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research, and Water Treatment and Disinfection.

Recent papers authored by Pim de Voogt include:

  • patRoon: open source software platform for environmental mass spectrometry based non-target screening, 2021, Journal of Cheminformatics
  • Wastewater-based epidemiology for illicit drugs: A critical review on global data, 2021, Water Research
  • Changes in drug use in European cities during early COVID-19 lockdowns - A snapshot from wastewater analysis, 2021, Environment International
  • Enantiomeric profiling of quinolones and quinolones resistance gene qnrS in European wastewaters, 2020, Water Research
  • Final opinion on the safety of breast implants in relation to anaplastic large cell lymphoma: Report of the scientific committee on health, emerging and environmental risks (SCHEER), 2021, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pim de Voogt include:

  • Thomas L. ter Laak
  • Félix Hernández
  • Annemarie P. van Wezel
  • John R. Parsons
  • Frederic Béen

They have published extensively in several scientific venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in Water Research, followed by The Science of The Total Environment, Environmental Science Processes & Impacts, Chemosphere, and Environmental Science & Technology.

Their scholarly contributions include a book publication with Springer Nature titled "Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 254" published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: Terminology, classification, and origins

    Robert C Buck;James Franklin;Urs Berger;Jason M Conder

  • Persistent organic pollutants (POPs): state of the science.

    K.C. Jones;P. de Voogt

  • An integrated assessment of estrogenic contamination and biological effects in the aquatic environment of The Netherlands

    A. Dick Vethaak;Joost Lahr;S. Marca Schrap;Angélique C. Belfroid

  • Evaluation of uncertainties associated with the determination of community drug use through the measurement of sewage drug biomarkers.

    Sara Castiglioni;Lubertus Bijlsma;Adrian Covaci;Erik Emke

  • Comparing illicit drug use in 19 European cities through sewage analysis.

    Kevin V. Thomas;Lubertus Bijlsma;Sara Castiglioni;Adrian Covaci

  • Environmental and toxicity effects of perfluoroalkylated substances.

    Floris M. Hekster;Remi W. P. M. Laane;Pim de Voogt

  • Toxicological relevance of emerging contaminants for drinking water quality

    Merijn Schriks;Minne B. Heringa;Margaretha M.E. van der Kooi;Pim de Voogt

  • Mind the Gap: Persistent and Mobile Organic Compounds-Water Contaminants That Slip Through.

    Thorsten Reemtsma;Urs Berger;Hans Peter H. Arp;Hervé Gallard

  • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food chain on perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and their salts

    D. Benford;J. de Boer;A. Carere;A. di Domenico

  • Spatial differences and temporal changes in illicit drug use in Europe quantified by wastewater analysis.

    Christoph Ort;Alexander L. N. van Nuijs;Jean-Daniel Berset;Lubertus Bijlsma

  • Distribution and sources of polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the River Rhine watershed

    Axel Möller;Lutz Ahrens;Renate Surm;Joke Westerveld

  • Impact of Treatment Processes on the Removal of Perfluoroalkyl Acids from the Drinking Water Production Chain

    Christian Eschauzier;Erwin Beerendonk;Petra Scholte-Veenendaal;Pim De Voogt

  • Production, properties and usage of polychlorinated biphenyls

    P. De Voogt;U.A.Th. Brinkman

  • The Madrid Statement on Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)

    Arlene Blum;Simona A. Balan;Martin Scheringer;Xenia Trier

  • Accurate mass screening and identification of emerging contaminants in environmental samples by liquid chromatography-hybrid linear ion trap Orbitrap mass spectrometry

    A.C. Hogenboom;J.A. van Leerdam;P. de Voogt

  • Review: Biological Activity, Determination and Occurrence of Planar, Mono- and Di-Ortho PCBs

    Pim De Voogt;David E. Wells;Lars Reutergårdh;Udo A. Th. Brinkman

  • Analytical challenges hamper perfluoroalkyl research

    Jonathan W. Martin;Kurunthachalam Kannan;Urs Berger;Pim De Voogt

  • Uptake of perfluorinated alkyl acids by hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa)

    Sebastian Felizeter;Michael S. McLachlan;Pim de Voogt

  • Biodegradation of perfluorinated compounds.

    John R. Parsons;Monica Sáez;Jan Dolfing;Pim de Voogt

  • Aerobic Biodegradation Studies of Nonylphenol Ethoxylates in River Water Using Liquid Chromatography−Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry

    Niels Jonkers;Thomas P. Knepper;Pim De Voogt

Frequent Co-Authors

Félix Hernández
Félix Hernández Jaume I University
Kevin V. Thomas
Kevin V. Thomas University of Queensland
Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern
Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern University of Bath
Alexander L.N. van Nuijs
Alexander L.N. van Nuijs University of Antwerp
Sara Castiglioni
Sara Castiglioni Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Adrian Covaci
Adrian Covaci University of Antwerp
Christoph Ort
Christoph Ort Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Lubertus Bijlsma
Lubertus Bijlsma Jaume I University
Benedek G. Plósz
Benedek G. Plósz University of Bath
Ettore Zuccato
Ettore Zuccato Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary online degrees that complement this field. For those interested in spatial data and environmental mapping, pursuing one of the best GIS graduate programs can provide vital skills in Geographic Information Systems, essential for environmental analysis and planning.

Additionally, leadership and policy roles in environmental organizations benefit from advanced administrative knowledge. Online programs like the best online MPA programs offer accelerated paths to develop expertise in public administration, allowing professionals to influence environmental policy effectively.

Understanding societal factors that impact the environment is another crucial angle. Degrees such as an online bachelors in sociology provide insights into human behavior and social dynamics that shape environmental challenges and solutions.

For educators aiming to integrate environmental sciences into academic settings, pursuing online EdD programs no dissertation offer practical doctoral pathways focused on leadership without the traditional dissertation, enabling quicker transitions into educational leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Pim de Voogt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles