World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lubertus Bijlsma

Lubertus Bijlsma

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
8213
World Ranking
15995
National Ranking
648

Lubertus Bijlsma publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lubertus Bijlsma sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 125 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Lubertus Bijlsma D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lubertus Bijlsma sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of uncertainties associated with the determination of community drug use through the measurement of sewage drug biomarkers.

    Sara Castiglioni;Lubertus Bijlsma;Adrian Covaci;Erik Emke

  • Comparing illicit drug use in 19 European cities through sewage analysis.

    Kevin V. Thomas;Lubertus Bijlsma;Sara Castiglioni;Adrian Covaci

  • Spatial differences and temporal changes in illicit drug use in Europe quantified by wastewater analysis.

    Christoph Ort;Alexander L. N. van Nuijs;Jean-Daniel Berset;Lubertus Bijlsma

  • Critical review on the stability of illicit drugs in sewers and wastewater samples

    Ann-Kathrin McCall;Richard Bade;Juliet Kinyua;Foon Yin Lai

  • Measuring biomarkers in wastewater as a new source of epidemiological information: Current state and future perspectives

    Emma Gracia-Lor;Emma Gracia-Lor;Sara Castiglioni;Richard Bade;Frederic Been

  • Multiresidue liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry determination of 52 non gas chromatography-amenable pesticides and metabolites in different food commodities☆

    F. Hernández;O.J. Pozo;J.V. Sancho;L. Bijlsma

  • Simultaneous ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry determination of amphetamine and amphetamine-like stimulants, cocaine and its metabolites, and a cannabis metabolite in surface water and urban wastewater.

    Lubertus Bijlsma;Juan V. Sancho;Elena Pitarch;Maria Ibáñez

  • Spatio‐temporal assessment of illicit drug use at large scale: evidence from 7 years of international wastewater monitoring

    Iria González-Mariño;Iria González-Mariño;Jose Antonio Baz-Lomba;Nikiforos A. Alygizakis;Maria Jesús Andrés-Costa

  • NORMAN guidance on suspect and non-target screening in environmental monitoring

    Unknown

  • Investigation of drugs of abuse and relevant metabolites in Dutch sewage water by liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry.

    Lubertus Bijlsma;Erik Emke;Félix Hernández Hernández;Pim de Voogt

  • The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE): facilitating European and worldwide collaboration on suspect screening in high resolution mass spectrometry

    Unknown

  • Removal of emerging contaminants in sewage water subjected to advanced oxidation with ozone

    M. Ibáñez;E. Gracia-Lor;L. Bijlsma;E. Morales

  • Rapid wide-scope screening of drugs of abuse, prescription drugs with potential for abuse and their metabolites in influent and effluent urban wastewater by ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry.

    Félix Hernández;Lubertus Bijlsma;Juan V. Sancho;Ramon Díaz

  • Investigation of pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs in waters by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry

    Felix Hernandez;Maria Ibáñez;Richard Bade;Lubertus Bijlsma

  • Suspect screening of large numbers of emerging contaminants in environmental waters using artificial neural networks for chromatographic retention time prediction and high resolution mass spectrometry data analysis

    Richard Bade;Lubertus Bijlsma;Thomas H. Miller;Leon P. Barron

  • LC-QTOF MS screening of more than 1,000 licit and illicit drugs and their metabolites in wastewater and surface waters from the area of Bogotá, Colombia

    Félix Hernández;María Ibáñez;Ana-María Botero-Coy;Richard Bade

  • Mass spectrometric strategies for the investigation of biomarkers of illicit drug use in wastewater

    Félix Hernández Hernández;Sara Castiglioni;Adrian Covaci;Pim de Voogt

  • Occurrence and ecological risks of pharmaceuticals in a Mediterranean river in Eastern Spain.

    Eddie Fonseca;Félix Hernández;María Ibáñez;Andreu Rico

  • Fragmentation pathways of drugs of abuse and their metabolites based on QTOF MS/MS and MSE accurate‐mass spectra

    Lubertus Bijlsma;Juan V. Sancho;Félix Hernández;Wilfried M.A. Niessen

  • Improving Target and Suspect Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflows in Environmental Analysis by Ion Mobility Separation.

    Alberto Celma;Juan V Sancho;Emma L Schymanski;David Fabregat-Safont

Frequent Co-Authors

Félix Hernández
Félix Hernández Jaume I University
Sara Castiglioni
Sara Castiglioni Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Alexander L.N. van Nuijs
Alexander L.N. van Nuijs University of Antwerp
Juan V. Sancho
Juan V. Sancho Jaume I University
Christoph Ort
Christoph Ort Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern
Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern University of Bath
Adrian Covaci
Adrian Covaci University of Antwerp
Pim de Voogt
Pim de Voogt University of Amsterdam
Kevin V. Thomas
Kevin V. Thomas University of Queensland
María Ibáñez
María Ibáñez Jaume I University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to various specialized careers, including forensic science. Many students looking to blend their chemistry knowledge with criminal justice interests explore an online masters forensic psychology program, which bridges scientific analysis and legal processes.

Career options in this field are diverse, with forensic science careers offering opportunities in crime labs, toxicology, and evidence analysis. Professionals with a chemistry background are well-suited for roles requiring detailed chemical expertise, as detailed in the overview of forensic science career paths.

For those considering the cost of further education, understanding the criminal justice degree price is essential. Tuition and fees can vary significantly, but many online programs offer affordable options that fit different budgets.

Entry-level positions often require foundational knowledge, which can be gained through an criminal justice associate degree online. This type of program provides practical skills that complement a chemistry background, setting the stage for advanced study or career advancement in related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Lubertus Bijlsma

Recently Published Articles