World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
118
Citations
86339
World Ranking
398
National Ranking
204

John Quackenbush publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Quackenbush sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 430 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

John Quackenbush D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Quackenbush sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Quackenbush is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the broad field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Molecular Biology. Additional areas of study include Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Cancer Research, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, especially Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Gene expression and cancer classification, and Gene Regulatory Network Analysis. Other topics covered include Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, RNA modifications and cancer, and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies.

John Quackenbush has contributed numerous papers to the scientific community. Notable recent publications include:

  • Sex Differences in Gene Expression and Regulatory Networks across 29 Human Tissues, 2020, published in Cell Reports
  • Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence, 2020, published in Nature
  • Molecular networks in Network Medicine: Development and applications, 2020, published in WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine
  • Genome-Wide Sex and Gender Differences in Cancer, 2020, published in Frontiers in Oncology
  • GRAND: a database of gene regulatory network models across human conditions, 2021, published in Nucleic Acids Research

The scientist collaborates frequently and has several established coauthors, including Marouen Ben Guebila, Camila M. Lopes-Ramos, Kimberly Glass, Dawn L. DeMeo, and Enakshi Saha.

John Quackenbush's research outputs have appeared in a variety of publication venues. The most frequent venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cancer Research, arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Genome Research.

Best Publications

  • Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes

    Joel S. Parker;Michael Mullins;Maggie C.U. Cheang;Samuel Leung

  • TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis.

    A.I. Saeed;V. Sharov;J. White;J. Li

  • Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data.

    Alvis Brazma;Pascal Hingamp;John Quackenbush;Gavin Sherlock

  • The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori

    Jean-F. Tomb;Owen White;Anthony R. Kerlavage;Rebecca A. Clayton

  • The Transcriptional Landscape of the Mammalian Genome

    P. Carninci;T. Kasukawa;S. Katayama;J. Gough

  • Microarray data normalization and transformation

    John Quackenbush

  • Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi

    Claire M. Fraser;Sherwood Casjens;Wai Mun Huang;Granger G. Sutton

  • COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF MICROARRAY DATA

    John Quackenbush

  • Analysis of the mouse transcriptome based on functional annotation of 60,770 full-length cDNAs

    Y. Okazaki;M. Furuno;T. Kasukawa;J. Adachi

  • Genesis: cluster analysis of microarray data

    Alexander Sturn;John Quackenbush;Zlatko Trajanoski

  • TIGR Gene Indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets

    Geo Pertea;Xiaoqiu Huang;Feng Liang;Valentin Antonescu

  • TM4 microarray software suite

    Alexander I. Saeed;Nirmal K. Bhagabati;John C. Braisted;Wei Liang

  • The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms

    Zhiyuan Hu;Cheng Fan;Daniel S Oh;JS Marron

  • The complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic, sulphate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus

    Hans-Peter Klenk;Rebecca A. Clayton;Jean-Francois Tomb;Owen White

  • Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors

    Jason I Herschkowitz;Karl Simin;Victor J Weigman;Igor Mikaelian

  • A Concise Guide to cDNA Microarray Analysis

    P. Hegde;R. Qi;K. Abernathy

  • A gene map of the human genome

    G. D. Schuler;M. S. Boguski;E. A. Stewart;L. D. Stein

  • Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms

    Rafael A Irizarry;Daniel Warren;Forrest Spencer;Irene F Kim

  • Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the model rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii yoelii

    Jane M. Carlton;Samuel V. Angiuoli;Bernard B. Suh;Taco W. Kooij

  • Department of Pathology, Thom as Jeffe rson University, Identific ation of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors.

    Jason I Herschkowitz;Karl Simin;Victor J Weigman;Igor Mikaelian

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Benjamin Haibe-Kains Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
David A. Schwartz
David A. Schwartz University of Colorado Denver
Dawn L. DeMeo
Dawn L. DeMeo Brigham and Women's Hospital
Naftali Kaminski
Naftali Kaminski Yale University
Hugo J.W.L. Aerts
Hugo J.W.L. Aerts Brigham and Women's Hospital
Aedín C. Culhane
Aedín C. Culhane University of Limerick
Avrum Spira
Avrum Spira Boston University
Frank C. Sciurba
Frank C. Sciurba University of Pittsburgh
Ivana V. Yang
Ivana V. Yang University of Colorado Denver
Edwin K. Silverman
Edwin K. Silverman Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics opens doors to numerous online degrees and career pathways in healthcare and science. Many students passionate about genetics may also be interested in healthcare administration, nursing, or allied fields. For example, if you’re considering a career closely related to patient care, you might want to look into programs like a nursing program that doesn't require teas, making the process more accessible.

Leadership roles in healthcare are also within reach. Earning a master of healthcare administration online can help you transition into management positions or combine your genetics background with organizational skills. For those seeking to fast-track their entry into nursing, fast track lpn options are available, providing quicker routes into the workforce.

Ambitious learners interested in advanced research or teaching careers can also consider online nursing doctoral programs. These flexible online degrees make it possible to overlap your genetics expertise with broader healthcare innovations, opening up a variety of fulfilling career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing John Quackenbush

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles