World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
14079
World Ranking
2732
National Ranking
302

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
14131
World Ranking
3028
National Ranking
288

Kim S. Graham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim S. Graham sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 159 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kim S. Graham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim S. Graham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kim S. Graham is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and imaging techniques. Their work also covers subfields such as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, experimental and cognitive psychology, and social psychology.

Graham's research interests are centered on advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, functional brain connectivity studies, advanced MRI techniques, memory and neural mechanisms, neonatal and fetal brain pathology, face recognition and perception, and memory processes and influences.

Frequent publication venues for Graham's research include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neuropsychologia, Scientific Data, Neuroimage Reports, and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

Some of their recent scientific papers include:

  • The role of the pre-commissural fornix in episodic autobiographical memory and simulation (2020, Neuropsychologia)
  • Pubertal timing and functional neurodevelopmental alterations independently mediate the effect of family conflict on adolescent psychopathology (2021, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience)
  • WAND: A multi-modal dataset integrating advanced MRI, MEG, and TMS for multi-scale brain analysis (2025, Scientific Data)
  • The interindividual variability of multimodal brain connectivity maintains spatial heterogeneity and relates to tissue microstructure (2022, Communications Biology)
  • A role for the fornix in temporal sequence memory (2023, European Journal of Neuroscience)

Graham has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including Andrew D. Lawrence, Carl J. Hodgetts, John Evans, Marie-Lucie Read, and Katja Umla-Runge.

Best Publications

  • Differing patterns of temporal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease and semantic dementia

    C. J. Galton;K. Patterson;Kim Samantha Graham;M. A. Lambon-Ralph

  • Differentiating the roles of the hippocampal complex and the neocortex in long-term memory storage: evidence from the study of semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

    Kim Samantha Graham;J. R. Hodges

  • Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex

    Russell Epstein;Russell Epstein;Kim Samantha Graham;Paul E. Downing

  • Going beyond LTM in the MTL: a synthesis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings on the role of the medial temporal lobe in memory and perception.

    Kim Samantha Graham;Morgan D. Barense;Andy C. H. Lee

  • Naming in semantic dementia—what matters?

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Kim Samantha Graham;Andrew W. Ellis;John R. Hodges

  • Perceptual deficits in amnesia: challenging the medial temporal lobe 'mnemonic' view.

    Andy C. H. Lee;Tim J. Bussey;Elisabeth A. Murray;Lisa M. Saksida

  • Specialization in the medial temporal lobe for processing of objects and scenes.

    Andy C. H. Lee;Mark J. Buckley;Sarah J. Pegman;Hugo Spiers

  • The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects.

    Morgan D. Barense;David Gaffan;Kim Samantha Graham;Kim Samantha Graham

  • The syndrome of transient epileptic amnesia.

    Christopher R. Butler;Christopher R. Butler;Kim Samantha Graham;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Narinder Kapur

  • Insights from semantic dementia on the relationship between episodic and semantic memory

    Kim S Graham;Jon S Simons;Katherine H Pratt;Karalyn Patterson

  • Functional specialization in the human medial temporal lobe

    Morgan D. Barense;Timothy J. Bussey;Andy C. H. Lee;Timothy T. Rogers

  • The human perirhinal cortex and semantic memory

    R. R. Davies;Kim S. Graham;John H. Xuereb;Guy B. Williams

  • The Evolution of Memory Systems: Ancestors, Anatomy, and Adaptations

    Elisabeth A. Murray;Steven P. Wise;Kim Samantha Graham

  • Pathologically proven frontotemporal dementia presenting with severe amnesia

    Andrew Graham;Rhys Davies;John Xuereb;Glenda Halliday

  • A reversal of the temporal gradient for famous person knowledge in semantic dementia: implications for the neural organisation of long-term memory.

    J. R. Hodges;J. R. Hodges;Kim Samantha Graham

  • Episodic and semantic memory in mild cognitive impairment

    R. B. Dudas;F. Clague;S. A. Thompson;S. A. Thompson;Kim Samantha Graham

  • Medial temporal lobe activity during complex discrimination of faces, objects, and scenes: Effects of viewpoint

    Morgan D. Barense;Richard N.A. Henson;Andy C.H. Lee;Kim Samantha Graham

  • Naming of objects, faces and buildings in mild cognitive impairment

    Samrah Ahmed;Robert Arnold;Sian A. Thompson;Kim Samantha Graham

  • Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Evidence from Concept Definitions by Patients with Semantic Dementia

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Kim S. Graham;Karalyn Patterson;John R. Hodges

  • The Effects of Aging on the Neural Correlates of Subjective and Objective Recollection

    Audrey Duarte;Richard N. Henson;Kim S. Graham;Kim S. Graham

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney
Karalyn Patterson
Karalyn Patterson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Steven P. Wise
Steven P. Wise National Institutes of Health
Andrew D. Lawrence
Andrew D. Lawrence Cardiff University
Elisabeth A. Murray
Elisabeth A. Murray National Institutes of Health
Morgan D. Barense
Morgan D. Barense University of Toronto
Jon S. Simons
Jon S. Simons University of Cambridge
Narinder Kapur
Narinder Kapur University College London
Timothy T. Rogers
Timothy T. Rogers University of Wisconsin–Madison
Paul E. Downing
Paul E. Downing Bangor University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a variety of flexible options for students at all life stages. Many top institutions throughout the United States now offer online psychology programs, making it possible to study from almost anywhere.

When considering online study, it's important to review school rankings and program quality. For instance, you can find detailed information about the best psychology degree programs ranking in Waco as well as the top psychology programs in Washington, D.C.. These listings help prospective students compare options and identify programs tailored to specific career goals.

Career pathways in psychology extend beyond clinical roles to include research, education, organizational consulting, and more. For those aiming to study in the Midwest, see the best psychology degree rankings in Wichita. Interested in programs in less-populated states? Review the best psychology degree rankings in Wyoming to explore additional opportunities.

Choosing the right online psychology degree program can open doors to diverse and rewarding careers, whether you are just starting out or advancing your profession.

Best Scientists Citing Kim S. Graham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles