World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4642 4298 259 251 172 9851
Neuroscience 54 4936 4539 136 128 191 10020

Muireann Irish publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Muireann Irish between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Muireann Irish published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 36 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 17 publications
2006 2025

226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Muireann Irish: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 3
2011 3
2012 5
2013 10
2014 13
2015 10
2016 19
2017 15
2018 12
2019 20
2020 15
2021 27
2022 21
2023 15
2024 19
2025 17
Total 226
Download as CSV

Muireann Irish publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muireann Irish sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 172 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 172
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Muireann Irish D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muireann Irish sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Gottschalk Medal, Australian Academy of Science

Overview

Muireann Irish is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work is concentrated on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, and Physiology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics including Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Muireann Irish has authored multiple recent papers, with notable publications including:

  • "Rethinking the episodic-semantic distinction from a gradient perspective," 2020, published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • "Understanding the multidimensional cognitive deficits of logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia," 2022, published in Brain
  • "Uncovering the prevalence and neural substrates of anhedonia in frontotemporal dementia," 2021, published in Brain
  • "Establishing two principal dimensions of cognitive variation in logopenic progressive aphasia," 2020, published in Brain Communications
  • "Mind-wandering in Parkinson's disease hallucinations reflects primary visual and default network coupling," 2020, published in Cortex

The venues where Muireann Irish most frequently publishes include Cortex, Brain Communications, Brain Sciences, Journal of Neurology, and Brain.

Frequent collaborators of the scientist include Olivier Piguet, Rebekah M. Ahmed, John R. Hodges, David Foxe, and James R. Burrell.

In 2020, Muireann Irish was awarded the Gottschalk Medal by the Australian Academy of Science.

Best Publications

  • Considering the role of semantic memory in episodic future thinking: evidence from semantic dementia

    Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Donna Rose Addis;Donna Rose Addis;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • The Pivotal Role of Semantic Memory in Remembering the Past and Imagining the Future

    Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • Investigating the enhancing effect of music on autobiographical memory in mild Alzheimer's disease.

    Muireann Irish;Conal J. Cunningham;J. Bernard Walsh;Davis Coakley

  • From Knowing to Remembering: the Semantic-Episodic distinction

    Louis Renoult;Muireann Irish;Morris Moscovitch;Michael D. Rugg;Michael D. Rugg

  • Profiles of recent autobiographical memory retrieval in semantic dementia, behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia, and Alzheimer's disease.

    M. Irish;M. Hornberger;M. Hornberger;S. Lah;L. Miller;L. Miller

  • Lost in spatial translation - A novel tool to objectively assess spatial disorientation in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

    Sicong Tu;Sicong Tu;Sicong Tu;Stephanie Wong;Stephanie Wong;Stephanie Wong;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish

  • Right anterior temporal lobe dysfunction underlies theory of mind impairments in semantic dementia.

    Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • Common and unique gray matter correlates of episodic memory dysfunction in frontotemporal dementia and alzheimer's disease

    Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Michael Hornberger;Michael Hornberger

  • Frontotemporal Dementia Associated With the C9ORF72 Mutation A Unique Clinical Profile

    Emma Devenney;Emma Devenney;Michael Hornberger;Michael Hornberger;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Eneida Mioshi;Eneida Mioshi

  • Rethinking the Role of the Angular Gyrus in Remembering the Past and Imagining the Future: The Contextual Integration Model.

    Siddharth Ramanan;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish

  • Impaired capacity for autonoetic reliving during autobiographical event recall in mild Alzheimer's disease.

    Muireann Irish;Brian A. Lawlor;Shane M. O'Mara;Robert F. Coen

  • In vivo and post-mortem memory circuit integrity in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

    Michael Hornberger;Michael Hornberger;Stephanie Wong;Rachel Tan;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish

  • Exploring the content and quality of episodic future simulations in semantic dementia.

    Muireann Irish;Donna Rose Addis;Donna Rose Addis;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • Discrete Neural Correlates for the Recognition of Negative Emotions: Insights from Frontotemporal Dementia

    Fiona Kumfor;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • Uncovering the Neural Bases of Cognitive and Affective Empathy Deficits in Alzheimer's Disease and the Behavioral-Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia.

    Nadene Dermody;Nadene Dermody;Stephanie Wong;Stephanie Wong;Rebekah Ahmed;Rebekah Ahmed;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • Impaired capacity for prospection in the dementias – Theoretical and clinical implications

    Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Pascale Piolino;Pascale Piolino

  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia: distinct and overlapping changes in eating behaviour and metabolism

    Rebekah M Ahmed;Rebekah M Ahmed;Rebekah M Ahmed;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Glenda M Halliday;Glenda M Halliday

  • Neuronal network disintegration: common pathways linking neurodegenerative diseases

    Rebekah M Ahmed;Rebekah M Ahmed;Emma M Devenney;Emma M Devenney;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Arne Ittner

  • Self-projection and the default network in frontotemporal dementia

    Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges

  • When One Loses Empathy Its Effect on Carers of Patients With Dementia

    Sharpley Hsieh;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Naomi Daveson;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney
Olivier Piguet
Olivier Piguet University of Sydney
Michael Hornberger
Michael Hornberger University of East Anglia
Fiona Kumfor
Fiona Kumfor University of Sydney
Claire O'Callaghan
Claire O'Callaghan University of Cambridge
Matthew C. Kiernan
Matthew C. Kiernan Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Glenda M. Halliday
Glenda M. Halliday University of Sydney
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna University of Arizona
Greg Savage
Greg Savage Macquarie University
Laurie A. Miller
Laurie A. Miller Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens doors to a wide variety of career options. One increasingly in-demand field is substance abuse counseling. Whether you are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Sacramento or other regions, specialized roles in this area require both foundational knowledge and specific credentials.

Each city or state may have its own criteria for entering this profession. For example, Saint Paul substance abuse counselors education requirements can differ significantly from other locations. Typically, candidates need at least a bachelor’s degree, with some positions requiring further certification or supervised clinical hours.

Certain regions also set unique certification standards. If you’re considering San Antonio substance abuse counselor certification requirements, for instance, you’ll want to check local regulations and accredited training programs.

The path to becoming a substance abuse counselor in San Diego also includes fulfilling state-recognized education and practical experience. Pursuing an online degree can help you meet these requirements and prepare for a meaningful career in mental health support.

Best Scientists Citing Muireann Irish

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles