World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Argentina
2026
Award Badge
Psychology
Argentina
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 88 1027 901 1 1 287 31591
Neuroscience 88 1192 1075 2 2 309 32025

Facundo Manes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Facundo Manes between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Facundo Manes published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2013. 6 of the 315 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2013. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1995 2025

315 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Facundo Manes: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 1
1997 5
1998 1
1999 6
2000 10
2001 2
2002 4
2003 3
2004 6
2005 6
2006 1
2007 2
2008 11
2009 12
2010 23
2011 34
2012 30
2013 38
2014 23
2015 21
2016 20
2017 12
2018 13
2019 9
2020 4
2021 8
2022 1
2023 1
2024 4
2025 2
Total 315
Download as CSV

Facundo Manes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Facundo Manes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 287 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 287
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Facundo Manes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Facundo Manes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83 88
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Neuroscience in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Argentina Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Argentina Leader Award

Overview

Facundo Manes is affiliated with Favaloro University in Argentina. Their research spans multiple fields including Neuroscience, Psychology, and Medicine, with a significant focus on subfields such as Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Clinical Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience also form part of their subdisciplinary interests.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, notably COVID-19 and Mental Health, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies. Other prominent areas include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, as well as Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research.

Manes has collaborated frequently with a set of co-authors, indicating ongoing research partnerships. These frequent collaborators include Marcelo Cetkovich, Agustín Ibáñez, Teresa Torralva, Harris A. Eyre, and William Hynes.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of subjects primarily centered on brain health, mental health, and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Selected recent papers include:

  • "A Brain Capital Grand Strategy: toward economic reimagination" (2020), published in Molecular Psychiatry
  • "The 2022 symposium on dementia and brain aging in low- and middle-income countries: Highlights on research, diagnosis, care, and impact" (2024), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Sooner than you think: A very early affective reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine in Argentina" (2020), published in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "Psychological symptoms, mental fatigue and behavioural adherence after 72 continuous days of strict lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina" (2021), published in BJPsych Open
  • "The Nairobi Declaration-Reducing the burden of dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): Declaration of the 2022 Symposium on Dementia and Brain Aging in LMICs" (2023), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia

Manes has frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's & Dementia, The Lancet Neurology, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, and the Journal of the Neurological Sciences, indicating a consistent presence in neuroscience and medical research journals.

Best Publications

  • Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

    Katya Rascovsky;John R. Hodges;David Knopman;Mario F. Mendez

  • Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants

    M L Gorno-Tempini;M L Gorno-Tempini;A E Hillis;S Weintraub;A Kertesz

  • Impaired recognition and experience of disgust following brain injury.

    Andrew J. Calder;Jill Keane;Facundo Manes;Nagui Antoun

  • Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex

    Facundo Manes;Barbara Sahakian;Luke Clark;Robert Rogers

  • The contributions of lesion laterality and lesion volume to decision-making impairment following frontal lobe damage

    Luke Clark;Facundo Manes;Nagui Antoun;Barbara J Sahakian

  • Executive function and fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions.

    María Roca;Alice Parr;Russell Thompson;Alexandra Woolgar

  • Contextual social cognition and the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia

    Agustin Ibañez;Facundo Manes;Facundo Manes

  • A neuropsychological battery to detect specific executive and social cognitive impairments in early frontotemporal dementia

    Teresa Torralva;María Roca;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Tristán Bekinschtein

  • INECO Frontal Screening (IFS): a brief, sensitive, and specific tool to assess executive functions in dementia

    Teresa Torralva;Mariáa Roca;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Pablo López

  • Decision-making cognition in neurodegenerative diseases

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Agustín Ibáñez;María Roca;Teresa Torralva

  • The relationship between affective decision-making and theory of mind in the frontal variant of fronto-temporal dementia

    Teresa Torralva;Christopher M. Kipps;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Luke Clark

  • A report on older-age bipolar disorder from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force

    Martha Sajatovic;Sergio A. Strejilevich;Ariel G. Gildengers;Annemiek Dols

  • Convergence of interoception, emotion, and social cognition: A twofold fMRI meta-analysis and lesion approach.

    Federico Adolfi;Blas Couto;Fabian Richter;Jean Decety

  • Impaired recognition of anger following damage to the ventral striatum

    Andrew J. Calder;Jill Keane;Andrew D. Lawrence;Facundo Manes

  • Clinical effects of insular damage in humans

    Agustin Ibañez;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Facundo Manes

  • A controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment of depression in the elderly.

    Facundo Manes;Ricardo Jorge;Maria Morcuende;Toru Yamada

  • Fluid intelligence loss linked to restricted regions of damage within frontal and parietal cortex

    Alexandra Woolgar;Alice Parr;Rhodri Cusack;Russell Thompson

  • Taking both sides: do unilateral anterior temporal lobe lesions disrupt semantic memory?

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Lisa Cipolotti;Lisa Cipolotti;Facundo Manes;Karalyn Patterson

  • Impaired set-shifting and dissociable effects on tests of spatial working memory following the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride in human volunteers

    Mitul A. Mehta;Facundo F. Manes;Gianna Magnolfi;Barbara J. Sahakian

  • Dementia in Latin America: Assessing the present and envisioning the future

    Mario A. Parra;Sandra Baez;Ricardo Allegri;Ricardo Nitrini

  • An MRI Study of the Corpus Callosum and Cerebellum in Mentally Retarded Autistic Individuals

    Facundo Manes;Joseph Piven;Daniela Vrancic;Valeria Nanclares

Frequent Co-Authors

Agustín Ibáñez
Agustín Ibáñez Adolfo Ibáñez University
Teresa Torralva
Teresa Torralva Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva
Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht
Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht Medical University of South Carolina
Sandra Baez
Sandra Baez Universidad de Los Andes
Adolfo M. García
Adolfo M. García University of San Andrés
Lucas Sedeño
Lucas Sedeño National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Mariano Sigman
Mariano Sigman Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Tristan A. Bekinschtein
Tristan A. Bekinschtein University of Cambridge
David Huepe
David Huepe Adolfo Ibáñez University
John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online programs and specialized career paths, including school counseling. School counselors play a vital role in supporting students’ academic and emotional well-being, and each state has specific requirements to help guide aspiring professionals.

For example, prospective counselors can review the Vermont school counselor education requirements to understand state-specific graduate-level coursework and licensure criteria. Other states like Virginia provide clear pathways, so learning about becoming a school counselor in Virginia helps candidates identify the necessary exams, supervised internships, and background checks.

Similarly, if you are interested in becoming a school counselor in Washington, you’ll need to meet specific credentialing standards and complete a state-approved program. In West Virginia, educators can explore steps for how to become a school counselor in West Virginia with a focus on certification and continuing education.

Whether you are seeking an online psychology degree or planning your career pathway, understanding the credentials required in your state is crucial for long-term success in education and mental health roles.

Best Scientists Citing Facundo Manes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles