World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark S. Allen

Mark S. Allen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 11015 10345 5668 5237 345 26295

Mark S. Allen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark S. Allen between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark S. Allen published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2016. 9 of the 375 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2016. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications
1985 2025

375 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark S. Allen: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 5
1992 7
1993 9
1994 6
1995 6
1996 10
1997 9
1998 7
1999 7
2000 8
2001 12
2002 10
2003 11
2004 16
2005 15
2006 13
2007 6
2008 15
2009 11
2010 16
2011 14
2012 14
2013 19
2014 16
2015 15
2016 24
2017 19
2018 10
2019 7
2020 3
2021 5
2022 11
2023 9
2024 4
2025 5
Total 375
Download as CSV

Mark S. Allen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Allen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 345 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 345
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark S. Allen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Allen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark S. Allen is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a total of 59 and 45 publications respectively in these domains. Within these main fields, their work is distributed across various subfields including clinical psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and sociology and political science.

Key research topics covered by Mark S. Allen include personality traits and psychology, heart rate variability and autonomic control, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, social and intergroup psychology, sexuality, behavior, and technology, eating disorders and behaviors, as well as behavioral health and interventions.

They have published prolifically in several journals, with the most frequent venues including:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Mark S. Allen are:

  • "Single Item Measures in Psychological Science", 2022, European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • "Face Validity", 2023, European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Mark S. Allen has collaborated frequently with other researchers, with top coauthors including Sylvain Laborde, Davina A. Robson, Shanda H. Blackmon, Mandira Mishra, and Dragoș Iliescu.

The work of Mark S. Allen covers important intersections of psychology and medicine, with studies addressing psychological assessment, psychophysiological regulation, and behavior. Their research interests also extend into areas related to heart rate variability and breathing interventions, as evidenced by frequent collaborations with Sylvain Laborde, who works in related biobehavioral topics.

Best Publications

  • Randomized trial of mediastinal lymph node sampling versus complete lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection in the patient with N0 or N1 (less than hilar) non–small cell carcinoma: Results of the American College of Surgery Oncology Group Z0030 Trial

    Gail E. Darling;Mark S. Allen;Paul A. Decker;Karla Ballman

  • Morbidity and Mortality of Major Pulmonary Resections in Patients With Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Initial Results of the Randomized, Prospective ACOSOG Z0030 Trial

    Mark S. Allen;Gail E. Darling;Taine T.V. Pechet;John D. Mitchell

  • Data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database: The surgical management of primary lung tumors

    Daniel J. Boffa;Mark S. Allen;Joshua D. Grab;Henning A. Gaissert

  • Clinical features of 5,628 primary lung cancer patients: experience at Mayo Clinic from 1997 to 2003.

    Ping Yang;Mark S. Allen;Marie C. Aubry;Jason A. Wampfler

  • Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

    Nabil P. Rizk;Hemant Ishwaran;Thomas W. Rice;Long Qi Chen

  • Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration.

    T. W. Rice;V. W. Rusch;C. Apperson-Hansen;M. S. Allen

  • Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial.

    Walter J. Scott;Mark S. Allen;Gail Darling;Bryan Meyers

  • Etiology of Chylothorax in 203 Patients

    Clinton H. Doerr;Mark S. Allen;Francis C. Nichols;Jay H. Ryu

  • Colorectal lung metastases: Results of surgical excision

    Molly K. McAfee;Mark S. Allen;Victor F. Trastek;Duane M. Ilstrup

  • Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model

    Cameron D. Wright;John C. Kucharczuk;Sean M. O'Brien;Joshua D. Grab

  • Esophageal Resection for Cancer of the Esophagus: Long-Term Function and Quality of Life

    Allison J McLarty;Claude Deschamps;Victor F Trastek;Mark S Allen

  • Inflammatory pseudotumors of the lung

    Robert J Cerfolio;Mark S Allen;Antonio G Nascimento;Claude Deschamps

  • Rapid dissolution of gallstones by methyl tert-butyl ether. Preliminary observations.

    Mark J. Allen;Thomas J. Borody;Thomas F. Bugliosi;Gerald R. May

  • Early and long-term results of prosthetic chest wall reconstruction.

    Claude Deschamps;Bulent Mehmit Tirnaksiz;Ramin Darbandi;Victor F. Trastek

  • Predictors Of Major Morbidity Or Mortality After Resection For Esophageal Cancer: A Society Of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database Risk Adjustment Model

    Daniel P. Raymond;Christopher W. Seder;Cameron D. Wright;Mitchell J. Magee

  • High short-term mortality following lung biopsy for usual interstitial pneumonia

    J P Utz;J H Ryu;W W Douglas;T E Hartman

  • Survival after recurrent nonsmall-cell lung cancer after complete pulmonary resection.

    Hiroshi Sugimura;Francis C. Nichols;Ping Yang;Mark S. Allen

  • Surgical treatment of hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colon cancer.

    James R Headrick;Daniel L Miller;David M Nagorney;Mark S Allen

  • Complete Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Is Associated With Enhanced Survival

    James M. Donahue;Francis C. Nichols;Zhuo Li;David A. Schomas

  • Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the lung

    Pasquale Ferraro;Victor F Trastek;Harkiran Adlakha;Claude Deschamps

Frequent Co-Authors

Claude Deschamps
Claude Deschamps Mayo Clinic
Ping Yang
Ping Yang Mayo Clinic
Joe B. Putnam
Joe B. Putnam The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Valerie W. Rusch
Valerie W. Rusch Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Cathy D. Schleck
Cathy D. Schleck Mayo Clinic
David R. Jones
David R. Jones Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Richard C. Daly
Richard C. Daly Mayo Clinic
Mark K. Ferguson
Mark K. Ferguson University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up diverse career avenues both in clinical and non-clinical settings. Many students and professionals consider related online degrees to complement or specialize their skillset. For instance, a nutrition degree online can provide in-depth knowledge about dietetics and human health, ideal for those interested in promoting wellness through food science.

Moving into healthcare management is another rewarding path. Students looking for respected leadership roles often pursue accredited mha programs to gain insights into the business and administration side of healthcare.

For nurses aiming to advance their qualifications, flexible options are available. The convenience of rn to bsn programs no clinicals helps working nurses upgrade their credentials without the need for additional on-site clinical hours.

Nurse practitioners or advanced nurses seeking the highest practice degree may consider the quickest dnp program available online for efficient career progression. These paths can align well with a future in medicine, helping you diversify skills and unlock new opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Allen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles