World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frank C. Detterbeck

Frank C. Detterbeck

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
42668
World Ranking
7898
National Ranking
4113

Frank C. Detterbeck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank C. Detterbeck sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 454 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank C. Detterbeck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank C. Detterbeck sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank C. Detterbeck is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and has a substantial publication record primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Neurology, and Surgery. Their research extensively covers topics related to lung cancer, including diagnosis, treatment, mutations, and the use of radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging.

Detterbeck's recent publications include the following papers:

  • The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groups in the Forthcoming (Ninth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer, 2024, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Screening for Lung Cancer, 2021, CHEST Journal
  • Radiation Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline, 2020, Practical Radiation Oncology
  • Management of Lung Nodules and Lung Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, CHEST Journal
  • The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer, 2023, Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Frequent co-authors working with Detterbeck include:

  • Ramón Rami-Porta
  • Hisao Asamura
  • Justin D. Blasberg
  • Paul Van Schil
  • Katherine K. Nishimura

The main venues where Detterbeck's work is published consist of:

  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • CHEST Journal
  • Journal of Thoracic Disease
  • UNC Libraries
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

The research topics prominently covered by Detterbeck are:

  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
  • Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Best Publications

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.

    Peter Goldstraw;Kari Chansky;John Crowley;Ramon Rami-Porta

  • Methods for Staging Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Gerard A. Silvestri;Anne V. Gonzalez;Michael A. Jantz;Mitchell L. Margolis

  • Benefits and Harms of CT Screening for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

    Peter B. Bach;Joshua N. Mirkin;Thomas K. Oliver;Christopher G. Azzoli

  • The Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification

    Frank C. Detterbeck;Daniel J. Boffa;Anthony W. Kim;Lynn T. Tanoue

  • The New Lung Cancer Staging System

    Frank C. Detterbeck;Daniel J. Boffa;Lynn T. Tanoue

  • Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).

    Frank C. Detterbeck;Michael A. Jantz;Michael Wallace;Johan Vansteenkiste

  • Noninvasive Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)

    Gerard A. Silvestri;Michael K. Gould;Mitchell L. Margolis;Lynn T. Tanoue

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Coding T Categories for Subsolid Nodules and Assessment of Tumor Size in Part-Solid Tumors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

    William D. Travis;Hisao Asamura;Alexander A. Bankier;Mary Beth Beasley

  • Superior Vena Cava Syndrome with Malignant Causes

    Lynn D. Wilson;Frank C. Detterbeck;Joachim Yahalom

  • Postoperative Radiotherapy for Stage II or III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

    Brian E. Lally;Daniel Zelterman;Joseph M. Colasanto;Bruce G. Haffty

  • The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Thymus: Continuity and Changes

    Alexander Marx;John K.C. Chan;Jean-Michel Coindre;Frank Detterbeck

  • Executive Summary: Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Frank C. Detterbeck;Sandra Zelman Lewis;Rebecca Diekemper;Doreen Addrizzo-Harris

  • Treatment of Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Nithya Ramnath;Thomas J. Dilling;Loren J. Harris;Anthony W. Kim

  • Invasive Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of the Current Evidence

    Eric M. Toloza;Linda Harpole;Frank Detterbeck;Douglas C. McCrory;Douglas C. McCrory

  • Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

    Frank C. Detterbeck;Peter J. Mazzone;David P. Naidich;Peter B. Bach

  • Systematic Review Evaluating the Timing of Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Combined Modality Therapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Daniel B. Fried;David E. Morris;Charles Poole;Julian G. Rosenman

  • The IASLC/ITMIG thymic epithelial tumors staging project : proposal for an evidence-based stage classification system for the forthcoming (8th) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumors

    Frank C. Detterbeck;Kelly Stratton;Dorothy Giroux;Hisao Asamura

  • The noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: the guidelines.

    Gerard A. Silvestri;Lynn T. Tanoue;Mitchell L. Margolis;John Barker

  • The Masaoka-Koga stage classification for thymic malignancies: clarification and definition of terms.

    Frank C. Detterbeck;Andrew G. Nicholson;Kazuya Kondo;Paul Van Schil

  • Blunt tracheobronchial injuries: treatment and outcomes.

    Andy Christopher Kiser;Sean M. O'Brien;Frank C. Detterbeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Socinski
Mark A. Socinski University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
William D. Travis
William D. Travis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Andrew G. Nicholson
Andrew G. Nicholson Royal Brompton Hospital
Hisao Asamura
Hisao Asamura Keio University
Meinoshin Okumura
Meinoshin Okumura Osaka University
Gerard A. Silvestri
Gerard A. Silvestri Medical University of South Carolina
John Crowley
John Crowley Washington University in St. Louis
Nicolas Girard
Nicolas Girard Institute Curie
Valerie W. Rusch
Valerie W. Rusch Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael K. Gould
Michael K. Gould Kaiser Permanente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative career paths in the medical field has become easier through accessible online programs. For those interested in administrative roles, medical coding certification offers an entry point into healthcare without hands-on patient care. These programs can typically be completed quickly and provide essential skills for managing medical records and billing.

Nursing remains one of the most versatile healthcare professions. There are flexible online nursing courses for aspiring nurses, while working nurses can advance with the cheapest online FNP program to become Family Nurse Practitioners. These options enable working professionals to grow their skills while balancing other commitments.

For those looking to teach or take on leadership roles, pursuing a PhD nursing education online can open doors to academic and high-level administrative positions within healthcare. No matter your career goals, online pathways offer affordable, flexible ways to join or advance in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Frank C. Detterbeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles