World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Donald E. Broadbent

Donald E. Broadbent

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
25653
World Ranking
3054
National Ranking
327

Donald E. Broadbent publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald E. Broadbent sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 195 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Donald E. Broadbent D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald E. Broadbent sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald E. Broadbent is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with notable work in information systems and library and information sciences. Additional areas of study include conservation, education, and the management of technology and innovation.

The scientist's academic output encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
  • Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Digital and Traditional Archives Management
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Web and Library Services
  • Social Development and Education Research
  • Management and Marketing Education

Broadbent has contributed papers to a range of publication venues. Frequent venues where their work appears include:

  • The Journal of Academic Librarianship
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Library Leadership & Management
  • Philosophy and Cosmology

Recent publications feature various aspects of library science, data management, and epistemology. Some of their papers include:

  • Collection weeding: Innovative processes and tools to ease the burden (2020, The Journal of Academic Librarianship)
  • In their own words: Perspectives on collection weeding from library employees and teaching faculty (2022, The Journal of Academic Librarianship)
  • Not Another Survey! Use Interviews Instead to Understand Needs in Your Library (2020, Library Leadership & Management)
  • Could Our Universe Have Been Initiated Intentionally: An Epistemological Framework (2023, Philosophy and Cosmology)
  • Bilateral Distribution Compression: Reducing Both Data Size and Dimensionality (2025, arXiv (Cornell University))

Broadbent's research has benefited from collaboration with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Gregory M. Nelson
  • Michael C. Goates
  • David Pixton
  • Megan Frost
  • Nick Whiteley

Best Publications

  • The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates

    Donald E. Broadbent;P. F. Cooper;P. FitzGerald;Katharine R. Parkes

  • On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge

    Dianne C. Berry;Donald E. Broadbent

  • From detection to identification: response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation.

    Donald E. Broadbent;Margaret H. P. Broadbent

  • On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory

    Fergus Ian Muirden Craik

  • Information Conveyed by Vowels

    Peter Ladefoged;D. E. Broadbent

  • The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span.

    Donald E. Broadbent

  • Task combination and selective intake of information

    Donald E. Broadbent

  • What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity

    Tony Gillie;Donald Broadbent

  • Interactive tasks and the implicit‐explicit distinction

    Dianne C. Berry;Donald E. Broadbent

  • Two modes of learning for interactive tasks

    Neil A. Hayes;Donald E. Broadbent

  • Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.

    Zoltan Dienes;Donald Broadbent;Dianne C. Berry

  • Implicit and explicit knowledge in the control of complex systems

    Donald E. Broadbent;Peter FitzGerald;Margaret H. P. Broadbent

  • A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory.

    Unknown

  • Anxiety and Attentional Bias: State and Trait

    Donald Broadbent;Margaret Broadbent

  • The hidden preattentive processes.

    Unknown

  • Levels, hierarchies, and the locus of control

    Donald E. Broadbent

  • Successive Responses to Simultaneous Stimuli

    D. E. Broadbent

  • The combination of explicit and implicit learning processes in task control

    Dianne C. Berry;Donald E. Broadbent

  • The Maltese cross: A new simplistic model for memory

    Donald E. Broadbent

  • Listening to one of two synchronous messages

    Donald E. Broadbent

  • VIGILANCE CONSIDERED AS A STATISTICAL DECISION.

    D. E. Broadbent;Margaret Gregory

  • Recency effects in visual memory

    Donald E. Broadbent;Margaret H. P. Broadbent

  • Tasks, errors and mental models: L P Goodstein, H B Andersen and S E Olsen (eds) Taylor & Francis (1988) £35, ISBN 0-85066-401-2, 342pp

    Donald E. Broadbent

Frequent Co-Authors

Dianne C. Berry
Dianne C. Berry University of Reading
Peter Ladefoged
Peter Ladefoged University of California, Los Angeles
Andrew Paul Smith
Andrew Paul Smith Cardiff University
Katharine R. Parkes
Katharine R. Parkes University of Oxford
Dylan Marc Jones
Dylan Marc Jones Cardiff University
John D. Teasdale
John D. Teasdale MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Vilayanur S. Ramachandran
Vilayanur S. Ramachandran University of California, San Diego
David M. Clark
David M. Clark University of Oxford
Maryanne Martin
Maryanne Martin University of Oxford
Zoltan Dienes
Zoltan Dienes University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology in the USA, you’ll discover a range of online degrees and career options in human services, counseling, and social work. Many psychology graduates pursue careers as licensed social workers, which requires specific educational steps depending on your location.

For example, if you want to become a social worker in New England, you must follow the social worker degree requirements in New Hampshire. Each state has unique licensing processes, as seen with the New Jersey education requirements for social workers and New Mexico education requirements for social workers.

In states like New York, you’ll need to understand the degree needed to be a social worker in New York before pursuing licensure. Many accredited online psychology and social work programs can help prepare you for these requirements, providing the flexibility to balance studies with other commitments.

Researching your state’s requirements and selecting the right online degree can open doors to meaningful career pathways in mental health, community support, and social advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Donald E. Broadbent

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles