World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
108
Citations
42173
World Ranking
428
National Ranking
273

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
95
Citations
35604
World Ranking
200
National Ranking
74

Peter A. Hancock publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Hancock sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 733 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Peter A. Hancock D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Hancock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Peter A. Hancock is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States. Their research activity primarily centers around psychology, with a significant focus on social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, and biomedical engineering.

The scientist's work spans several main topics, including human-automation interaction and safety, occupational health and safety research, ethics and social impacts of artificial intelligence, ergonomics and human factors, healthcare technology and patient monitoring, cognitive functions and memory, and safety warnings and signage.

Peter A. Hancock has contributed extensively to numerous publication venues. Frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  • Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • Ergonomics
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

The scientist's recent papers comprise:

  • "The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality as Training Enhancement Methods: A Meta-Analysis", 2020, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • "Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-Analytic Findings", 2021, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • "Neural Decoding of EEG Signals with Machine Learning: A Systematic Review", 2021, Brain Sciences
  • "How indoor environmental quality affects occupants' cognitive functions: A systematic review", 2021, Building and Environment
  • "Evolving Trust in Robots: Specification Through Sequential and Comparative Meta-Analyses", 2020, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their career, working frequently with co-authors such as Waldemar Karwowski, Alexandra D. Kaplan, Mira E. Gruber, Jessica Cruit, and Theresa T. Kessler.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction.

    Peter A. Hancock;Deborah R. Billings;Kristin E. Schaefer;Jessie Y. C. Chen

  • A dynamic model of stress, and sustained attention

    P. A. Hancock;Joel S. Warm

  • State of science: mental workload in ergonomics

    Mark S. Young;Karel A. Brookhuis;Christopher D. Wickens;Peter A. Hancock

  • Human Mental Workload

    Peter A. Hancock;Najmedin Meshkati

  • Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness:

    Kip Smith;Peter A. Hancock

  • Recognition of unfamiliar faces

    Peter J.B. Hancock;Vicki Bruce;A.Mike Burton

  • A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems

    Kristin E. Schaefer;Jessie Y. C. Chen;James L. Szalma;Peter A. Hancock

  • Verification of face identities from images captured on video.

    Vicki Bruce;Zoë Henderson;Karen Greenwood;Peter J. B. Hancock

  • How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review

    Richard A. Block;Peter A. Hancock;Dan Zakay

  • Effects of heat stress on cognitive performance: the current state of knowledge

    P A Hancock;I Vasmatzidis

  • Age differences and changes in reaction time: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.

    JL James Fozard;JL James Fozard;Max Vercruyssen;Sara L Reynolds;PA Hancock

  • The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver.

    P. A. Hancock;M. Lesch;Lisa Simmons

  • Noise Effects on Human Performance: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis

    James L. Szalma;Peter A. Hancock

  • The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality as Training Enhancement Methods: A Meta-Analysis.

    Alexandra D. Kaplan;Jessica Cruit;Mica R. Endsley;Suzanne M. Beers

  • Stress, Workload, and Fatigue

    Peter A. Hancock;Paula A. Desmond

  • Viewing it differently: social scene perception in Williams syndrome and autism.

    Deborah M. Riby;Peter J.B. Hancock

  • A Meta-Analysis of Performance Response Under Thermal Stressors

    Peter A. Hancock;Jennifer M. Ross;James L. Szalma

  • VIGILANCE AND WORKLOAD IN AUTOMATED SYSTEMS.

    John S Warm;William N Dember;Peter A Hancock

  • From Pixels to People: A Model of Familiar Face Recognition

    A Mike Burton;Vicki Bruce;Peter J B Hancock

  • FACE PROCESSING : HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS

    Peter J. B. Hancock;A. Mike Burton;Vicki Bruce

  • DISTRACTION EFFECTS OF PHONE USE DURING A CRUCIAL DRIVING MANEUVER

    Peter A Hancock;Mary Lesch;Lucy Simmons;Mustapha Mouloua

Frequent Co-Authors

James L. Szalma
James L. Szalma University of Central Florida
Raja Parasuraman
Raja Parasuraman George Mason University
Robert R. Hoffman
Robert R. Hoffman Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Joel S. Warm
Joel S. Warm United States Air Force Research Laboratory
Gerald Matthews
Gerald Matthews George Mason University
Mark Chignell
Mark Chignell University of Toronto
William N. Dember
William N. Dember University of Cincinnati
Richard A. Block
Richard A. Block Montana State University
Waldemar Karwowski
Waldemar Karwowski University of Central Florida
Shashi Shekhar
Shashi Shekhar University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Engineering and Technology opens many doors, but there are also online degrees that can expand your skills or diversify your career. Many students choose to complement their technical expertise with a cheap online hr masters degree to gain insights into human resources management, a vital skill in tech-driven organizations.

For those looking to enhance their communication strengths, an online masters in communication can be an excellent next step. This degree helps tech professionals bridge gaps between technical teams and other departments.

If your ambitions include launching your own business or leading an innovative venture, an mba entrepreneurship online provides essential business frameworks and leadership tools tailored for entrepreneurs.

Additionally, those seeking advancement in general management may consider the top online mba programs no gmat, which offer flexible admissions and business acumen suited to tech professionals.

These online programs are flexible, affordable, and can be pursued alongside your current work or studies in Engineering and Technology. Exploring these pathways can broaden career opportunities and deepen your expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Hancock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles