World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
9422
World Ranking
8111
National Ranking
4349

Richard A. Block publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Block sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard A. Block D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Block sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard A. Block is affiliated with Montana State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology with significant engagement in the subfields of social psychology and physiology. They have also contributed to areas related to atomic and molecular physics, optics, as well as astronomy and astrophysics.

Their work addresses multiple topics, notably:

  • Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

Richard A. Block's recent publications include:

  • Physical Time Within Human Time, 2022, Frontiers in Psychology
  • From Physical Time to a Dualistic Model of Human Time, 2020, Foundations of Science
  • Commentaries for 'Physical Time Within Human Time', 2024, Timing & Time Perception
  • Solving the 'Two Times Problem' With an Information Gathering and Utilizing System (IGUS), 2022, Preprints.org

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated most with this researcher include:

  • Carlos Montemayor
  • Ronald P. Gruber
  • Ronanld P. Gruber

The venues in which Richard A. Block has published frequently are:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Foundations of Science
  • Timing & Time Perception
  • Preprints.org

Across their career, their scholarly output reflects an intersection of psychological inquiry with broader scientific questions involving time perception, biophysics, and quantum mechanics. The blend of topics and interdisciplinary approaches characterize the scope of their contributions to academic research.

Best Publications

  • Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review

    Richard A. Block;Dan Zakay

  • Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor ANOVA Designs

    Charles A. Pierce;Richard A. Block;Herman Aguinis

  • How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review

    Richard A. Block;Peter A. Hancock;Dan Zakay

  • Cognitive models of psychological time.

    Richard A. Block

  • The role of attention in time estimation processes

    Dan Zakay;Richard A. Block

  • Temporal Cognition

    Unknown

  • Human Aging and Duration Judgments: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Richard A. Block;Dan Zakay;Peter A. Hancock

  • Repetition and memory: Evidence for a multiple-trace hypothesis.

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Richard A. Block

  • Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis.

    Richard A. Block;Marjorie A. Reed

  • Models of psychological time.

    Richard A. Block

  • Overconfidence in estimation: Testing the anchoring-and-adjustment hypothesis

    Richard A Block;David R Harper

  • Memory for mode of input

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Richard A. Block;Norman R. Inskeep

  • Sex differences in duration judgments: A meta-analytic review

    Richard A. Block;Peter A. Hancock;D. A. N. Zakay

  • Developmental Changes in Human Duration Judgments: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Richard A. Block;Dan Zakay;Peter A. Hancock

  • Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: an executive-control perspective

    Unknown

  • Time perception, attention, and memory: A selective review

    Richard A. Block;Ronald P. Gruber

  • Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval.

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Jeffrey J. Summers;Richard A. Block

  • Remembered duration: Effects of event and sequence complexity

    Richard A. Block

  • Chapter 9 Experiencing and Remembering Time: Affordances, Context, and Cognition

    Richard A. Block

  • Memory and the experience of duration in retrospect.

    Richard A. Block

  • Prospective and Retrospective Duration Judgment: The Role of Information Processing and Memory

    Richard A. Block

  • Temporal judgments and contextual change.

    Richard A. Block

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan Zakay
Dan Zakay Reichman University
Douglas L. Hintzman
Douglas L. Hintzman University of Oregon
Peter A. Hancock
Peter A. Hancock University of Central Florida
Jeffery J. Summers
Jeffery J. Summers Liverpool John Moores University
Simon Grondin
Simon Grondin Université Laval
Robert R. Hoffman
Robert R. Hoffman Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Charles A. Pierce
Charles A. Pierce University of Memphis
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Raja Parasuraman
Raja Parasuraman George Mason University
James L. Szalma
James L. Szalma University of Central Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of exciting online degrees and specialized career tracks. Many psychology roles require specific educational backgrounds and advanced degrees to practice professionally, making your choice of program very important.

For those interested in criminal justice and law, understanding the educational requirements for forensic psychologist roles can be crucial. If you're fascinated by how the brain functions in relation to behavior, you may want to explore the education for neuropsychologist, which often involves advanced graduate degrees and specialized training.

Those aiming to become licensed medical professionals working with mental health will need to meet the what degree for psychiatrist requirements, which typically include medical school and psychiatric residency.

Students passionate about sports and performance psychology should learn about requirements for sports psychology careers, which blend psychological training with knowledge of athletic performance.

Each of these psychology-related fields often encourages—if not requires—graduate study, hands-on experience, and ongoing education. Online degree programs can offer the flexibility needed to pursue these advanced pathways while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Block

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles