World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
8076
World Ranking
8153
National Ranking
4375

Nicholas Christenfeld publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Christenfeld sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nicholas Christenfeld D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Christenfeld sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas Christenfeld is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research intersects the areas of health professions and social sciences, focusing particularly on issues related to health disparities and outcomes, public health policies and education, and food security and health in diverse populations.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Health Professions
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, they have contributed to specific subfields such as:

  • General Health Professions
  • Health

Christenfeld's recent scholarly work includes a publication titled The Geography of Health, released in 2020. This paper appeared in The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology, a venue where they have published at least one paper.

Frequent collaborators in their research are:

  • Arseny A. Ryazanov
  • Kirstie K. Russell

Their research addresses and contributes to understanding several main topics, including:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Public Health Policies and Education
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Best Publications

  • Increase in US medication-error deaths between 1983 and 1993

    David P Phillips;Nicholas Christenfeld;Laura M Glynn

  • PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS REACTIVITY AND RECOVERY: CONCEPTUAL SIBLINGS SEPARATED AT BIRTH?

    Wolfgang Linden;Wolfgang Linden;Wolfgang Linden;T. L. Earle;T. L. Earle;T. L. Earle;W. Gerin;W. Gerin;W. Gerin;N. Christenfeld;N. Christenfeld;N. Christenfeld

  • Toward a causal model of cardiovascular responses to stress and the development of cardiovascular disease.

    Amy R. Schwartz;William Gerin;Karina W. Davidson;Thomas G. Pickering

  • The role of rumination in recovery from reactivity: cardiovascular consequences of emotional states.

    Laura M. Glynn;Nicholas Christenfeld;William Gerin

  • The role of angry rumination and distraction in blood pressure recovery from emotional arousal.

    William Gerin;Karina W. Davidson;Nicholas J. S. Christenfeld;Tanya Goyal

  • Speech Disfluency and the Structure of Knowledge

    Stanley Schachter;Nicholas Christenfeld;Bernard Ravina;Frances Bilous

  • Gender, social support, and cardiovascular responses to stress.

    Laura M. Glynn;Nicholas Christenfeld;William Gerin

  • Risk Factors, Confounding, and the Illusion of Statistical Control

    Nicholas J. S. Christenfeld;Richard P. Sloan;Douglas Carroll;Sander Greenland

  • Gender, Jealousy, and Reason

    Christine R. Harris;Nicholas Christenfeld

  • Music can facilitate blood pressure recovery from stress.

    Sky Chafin;Michael Roy;William Gerin;Nicholas Christenfeld

  • Choices from Identical Options

    Nicholas Christenfeld

  • Social support effects on cardiovascular reactivity: is a stranger as effective as a friend?

    Nicholas Christenfeld;William Gerin;Wolfgang Linden;Mara Sanders

  • Underestimating the Duration of Future Events: Memory Incorrectly Used or Memory Bias?

    Michael M. Roy;Nicholas J. S. Christenfeld;Craig R. M. McKenzie

  • An increase in the number of deaths in the United States in the first week of the month--an association with substance abuse and other causes of death.

    David P. Phillips;Nicholas Christenfeld;Natalie M. Ryan

  • An historical context for behavioral models of hypertension

    William Gerin;Thomas G Pickering;Laura Glynn;Nicholas Christenfeld

  • Story Spoilers Don’t Spoil Stories

    Jonathan D. Leavitt;Nicholas J. S. Christenfeld

  • Social support and cardiovascular reactivity

    N. Christenfeld;W. Gerin

  • Increase in US medication-error deaths

    DP Phillips;N Christenfeld;LM Glynn

  • On the reliable assessment of cardiovascular recovery: an application of curve-fitting techniques.

    Nicholas Christenfeld;Laura M. Glynn;William Gerin;William Gerin

  • Jealousy and Rational Responses to Infidelity Across Gender and Culture

    Christine R. Harris;Nicholas Christenfeld

Frequent Co-Authors

William Gerin
William Gerin Pennsylvania State University
Laura M. Glynn
Laura M. Glynn Chapman University
David P. Phillips
David P. Phillips University of California, San Diego
Christine R. Harris
Christine R. Harris University of California, San Diego
Thomas G. Pickering
Thomas G. Pickering Columbia University
John T. Wixted
John T. Wixted University of California, San Diego
Wolfgang Linden
Wolfgang Linden University of British Columbia
James A. Kulik
James A. Kulik University of California, San Diego
Karina W. Davidson
Karina W. Davidson Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Laura Mickes
Laura Mickes University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens the door to a wide range of online programs and career pathways in the USA. Many students choose to explore specialized roles such as Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), which offer meaningful work and strong employment prospects.

To become a licensed SLP, requirements vary significantly by state. For example, California speech pathologist certification requirements emphasize accredited graduate education, clinical experience, and passing national exams. If you’re interested in practicing elsewhere, you should know that slp requirements in Colorado or slp requirements in Connecticut may include additional state-level exams or background checks.

For aspiring professionals looking at the East Coast, Delaware speech pathologist certification requirements detail processes around clinical fellowship and licensure endorsement. Regardless of your state, online degrees and flexible learning options make entering these rewarding fields more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Christenfeld

Trending Scientists