World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
70
Citations
22026
World Ranking
2246
National Ranking
1310

James A. Kulik publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Kulik sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James A. Kulik D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Kulik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James A. Kulik is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their academic contributions are primarily housed within this institution.

No specific data about recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, main topics of work, or awards were provided. Therefore, detailed information on these aspects of their career is not available.

Given the absence of further data, the profile focuses on the known affiliation, offering a basic contextual placement in the academic landscape.

Best Publications

  • The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events

    Robert L. Bangert-Drowns;Chen-Lin C. Kulik;James A. Kulik;MaryTeresa Morgan

  • Flashbulb memories

    Unknown

  • Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik

  • Effectiveness of Computer-based College Teaching: A Meta-analysis of Findings

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik;Peter A. Cohen

  • Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems A Meta-Analytic Review

    James A. Kulik;J. D. Fletcher

  • Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-Analysis

    Chen-Lin C. Kulik;James A. Kulik;Robert L. Bangert-Drowns

  • Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion.

    Brooks B. Gump;James A. Kulik

  • Meta-analytic Findings on Grouping Programs

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik

  • Burnout, self- and supervisor-rated job performance, and absenteeism among nurses.

    Patricia A. Parker;James A. Kulik

  • Social support and recovery from surgery.

    James A. Kulik;Heike I. Mahler

  • Using UV photography to reduce use of tanning booths: a test of cognitive mediation.

    Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard;David J. Lane;Heike I. M. Mahler

  • Emotional support as a moderator of adjustment and compliance after coronary artery bypass surgery: a longitudinal study.

    James A. Kulik;Heike I. M. Mahler;Heike I. M. Mahler

  • 7: The Evaluation of Teachers in Higher Education

    James A. Kulik;Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Effects of appearance-based interventions on sun protection intentions and self-reported behaviors.

    Heike I. M. Mahler;James A. Kulik;Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard

  • Effects of UV photographs, photoaging information, and use of sunless tanning lotion on sun protection behaviors.

    Heike I. M. Mahler;James A. Kulik;Jody Harrell;Alma Correa

  • Social comparison and women's body satisfaction.

    Lilly F. Lin;James A. Kulik

  • Long-term effects of appearance-based interventions on sun protection behaviors.

    Heike I M Mahler;James A Kulik;Meg Gerrard;Frederick X Gibbons

  • The Keller Plan in Science Teaching: An individually paced, student-tutored, and mastery-oriented instructional method is evaluated.

    James A. Kulik;Kevin Carmichael;Chen-Lin Kulik

  • Social norms information enhances the efficacy of an appearance-based sun protection intervention

    Heike I.M. Mahler;Heike I.M. Mahler;James A. Kulik;Heather A. Butler;Meg Gerrard

  • Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall.

    Charles M. Judd;James A. Kulik

  • Preferences for health care involvement, perceived control and surgical recovery: a prospective study.

    Heike I.M. Mahler;James A. Kulik

  • Future time perspective: its relation to the socialization process and the delinquent role.

    Kenneth B. Stein;Theodore Sarbin;James A. Kulik

  • Social comparison and affiliation under threat: Effects on recovery from major surgery.

    James A. Kulik;Heike I. M. Mahler;Philip J. Moore

  • 6: Effective College Teaching:

    Wilbert J. McKeachie;James A. Kulik

  • Toward an Understanding of Gender Differences in the Impact of Marital Conflict on Health

    Rebekah Wanic;James Kulik

  • Effects of social comparisons with peers on women's body satisfaction and exercise behavior

    Kari A. Wasilenko;James A. Kulik;Rebekah A. Wanic

  • Health status, perceptions of risk, and prevention interest for health and nonhealth problems.

    James A. Kulik;Heike I. Mahler

  • Confirmatory attribution and the perpetuation of social beliefs.

    James A. Kulik

Frequent Co-Authors

Heike I. M. Mahler
Heike I. M. Mahler University of California, San Diego
Meg Gerrard
Meg Gerrard University of Connecticut
Frederick X. Gibbons
Frederick X. Gibbons University of Connecticut
Nicholas Christenfeld
Nicholas Christenfeld University of California, San Diego
Edmund Fantino
Edmund Fantino University of California, San Diego
Ellen R. Gritz
Ellen R. Gritz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Hoda Badr
Hoda Badr Baylor College of Medicine
Frank J. Penedo
Frank J. Penedo University of Miami
William Gerin
William Gerin Pennsylvania State University
Shelley E. Taylor
Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens doors to diverse online degrees and career routes, especially in counseling and mental health. Many students are searching for programs that are flexible, reputable, and budget-friendly.

Affordability is a significant concern for aspiring counselors. If you’re interested in pursuing a career in this field, consider reviewing affordable counseling programs in Nashville as well as affordable counseling programs in New Orleans. Both cities host schools that offer accessible pathways to licensure and practical experience.

East Coast students can also explore affordable counseling programs in New Jersey and the cheapest counseling programs in New York. These programs may offer online and hybrid course options, which help balance studies with work or family commitments.

Whether you’re pursuing a bachelor’s, master’s, or a specialized certificate, researching online degrees and affordable counseling programs can help launch a successful and meaningful career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing James A. Kulik

Recently Published Articles