World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4076 3761 2281 2057 190 10121

Edmund Fantino publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edmund Fantino between 1965 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edmund Fantino published across 58 years, from 1965 to 2022, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1991. 2 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 1991. 1965: 1 publication 1966: 3 publications 1967: 3 publications 1968: 6 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 3 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 6 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 5 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications
1965 2022

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edmund Fantino: publications per year, 1965 to 2022
Year Publications
1965 1
1966 3
1967 3
1968 6
1969 1
1970 3
1971 2
1972 6
1973 2
1974 4
1975 3
1976 1
1977 1
1978 3
1979 2
1980 3
1981 4
1982 4
1983 6
1984 4
1985 5
1986 1
1987 5
1988 7
1989 5
1990 5
1991 8
1992 1
1993 4
1994 2
1995 5
1996 8
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 7
2001 3
2002 4
2003 6
2004 3
2005 7
2006 7
2007 4
2008 5
2009 2
2010 5
2011 2
2012 3
2013 5
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 2
Total 191
Download as CSV

Edmund Fantino publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmund Fantino sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 190
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Edmund Fantino D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmund Fantino sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Edmund Fantino is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology, with specific attention to applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and social psychology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Fantino has contributed to research published in the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled "Differences in Mood, Optimism, and Risk-Taking Behavior Between American and Chinese College Students," published in 2022 in Frontiers in Psychology.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Jiao Wang
  • Ruifeng Cui
  • Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino
  • Xiaoming Liu

Best Publications

  • Choice and rate of reinforcement.

    Edmund Fantino

  • Choice optimal foraging, and the delay-reduction hypothesis

    Edmund Fantino;Nureya Abarca

  • Self-control and general models of choice.

    Douglas J. Navarick;Edmund Fantino

  • The experimental analysis of behavior : a biological perspective

    Edmund J. Fantino;Cheryl A. Logan

  • A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.

    Nancy Squires;Edmund Fantino

  • Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

    Edmund Fantino

  • Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction.

    Edmund Fantino;David A. Case

  • Choice and foraging.

    Nureya Abarca;Edmund Fantino

  • An Experientially Derived Base-Rate Error in Humans

    Adam S. Goodie;Edmund Fantino

  • Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error

    Adam S. Goodie;Edmund Fantino

  • Percentage reinforcement and choice.

    Edmund Fantino;Roger Dunn;Warren Meck

  • Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement

    Ben A. Williams;Edmund Fantino

  • Increased False-Memory Susceptibility After Mindfulness Meditation

    Brent M. Wilson;Laura Mickes;Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino;Matthew Evrard

  • Choice and the relative immediacy of reinforcement

    Roger Dunn;Edmund Fantino

  • The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.

    David A. Case;Edmund Fantino

  • The conjunction effect: new evidence for robustness.

    Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino;Edmund Fantino;Daniel J. Zizzo;Julie Wen

  • The sunk cost effect in pigeons and humans

    Anton D. Navarro;Edmund Fantino

  • Human observing: maintained by negative informative stimuli only if correlated with improvement in response efficiency.

    David A. Case;Edmund Fantino;John Wixted;John Wixted

  • Commodity specific rates of temporal discounting: Does metabolic function underlie differences in rates of discounting? ☆

    Shawn R. Charlton;Edmund Fantino

  • Immediate reward followed by extinction vs. later reward without extinction

    Edmund Fantino

  • Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer.

    Edmund Fantino;Nancy Squires;Nicola Delbrück;Christa Peterson

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Case
David A. Case Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Adam S. Goodie
Adam S. Goodie University of Georgia
Steven R. Hursh
Steven R. Hursh Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
John T. Wixted
John T. Wixted University of California, San Diego
Michael Cole
Michael Cole University of East London
Stephen E. G. Lea
Stephen E. G. Lea University of Exeter
James A. Kulik
James A. Kulik University of California, San Diego
Peter R. Killeen
Peter R. Killeen Arizona State University
Michael Davison
Michael Davison University of Auckland
Laura Mickes
Laura Mickes University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up numerous online pathways, especially in counseling and related professions. Many universities across the U.S. now offer flexible, accredited online programs to help students balance their studies with work or other commitments.

Affordability is a key concern for students. Prospective psychology majors often search for the most affordable counseling degree programs in Saint Louis or seek options in other locations. For example, there are affordable counseling programs in Saint Paul and the most affordable counseling degree programs in San Diego, all aiming to reduce student debt and make higher education more accessible.

Exploring affordable counseling programs in Seattle can also open doors to in-demand careers in mental health, school counseling, or organizational psychology. By choosing cost-effective programs, students can earn reputable degrees online, preparing for licensure and satisfying the growing need for qualified mental health professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Edmund Fantino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles