World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
5547
World Ranking
11307
National Ranking
5907

Adam S. Goodie publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam S. Goodie sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Adam S. Goodie D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam S. Goodie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam S. Goodie is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research encompasses multiple disciplines with a focus on clinical psychology and ocean engineering. The scientist's work addresses topics such as gambling behavior and treatments, as well as evacuation and crowd dynamics.

Recent publications by Adam S. Goodie include:

  • "Relations Among Gambling Behavior, Associated Problems, Game Type, and Risk Factors in a Rural, African American, Adolescent Sample" (2021, Journal of Gambling Studies)
  • "Reviewer Acknowledgments" (2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)
  • "Analyzing Human Perceptions of a MEDEVAC Robot in a Simulated Evacuation Scenario" (2024, arXiv (Cornell University))

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Theresa R. Reilly
  • Steven M. Kogan
  • Ana M. Abrantes
  • Abby L. Braitman
  • Ryan Carpenter

Adam S. Goodie's publications often appear in the following venues:

  • Journal of Gambling Studies
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Their research topics span:

  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics

Subfields of study for Adam S. Goodie include:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Ocean Engineering

Best Publications

  • Narcissism, Confidence, and Risk Attitude

    W. Keith Campbell;Adam S. Goodie;Joshua D. Foster

  • Overconfidence and the Big Five

    Peter S. Schaefer;Cristina C. Williams;Adam S. Goodie;W.Keith Campbell

  • Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of pathological gambling: a review.

    Erica E. Fortune;Adam S. Goodie

  • Dispositional Mindfulness as a Predictor of the Severity of Gambling Outcomes

    Chad E. Lakey;W. Keith Campbell;Kirk Warren Brown;Adam S. Goodie

  • Measuring cognitive distortions in pathological gambling: review and meta-analyses.

    Adam S. Goodie;Erica E. Fortune

  • Probing the link between narcissism and gambling: the mediating role of judgment and decision‐making biases

    Chad E. Lakey;Paul Rose;W. Keith Campbell;Adam S. Goodie

  • Decision making under time pressure, modeled in a prospect theory framework

    Diana L. Young;Adam S. Goodie;Daniel B. Hall;Eric Wu

  • The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling.

    Adam S. Goodie

  • Examining the relations among narcissism, impulsivity, and self-defeating behaviors.

    Joshua D. Miller;W. Keith Campbell;Diana L. Young;Chad E. Lakey

  • An Experientially Derived Base-Rate Error in Humans

    Adam S. Goodie;Edmund Fantino

  • Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error

    Adam S. Goodie;Edmund Fantino

  • Exploring the relations among executive functions, fluid intelligence, and personality.

    Nash Unsworth;Joshua D. Miller;Chad E. Lakey;Diana L. Young

  • Review of the effects of Five Factor Model personality traits on network structures and perceptions of structure

    Mary Selden;Adam S. Goodie

  • Base-rate training without case cues reduces base-rate neglect.

    David A. Case;Edmund Fantino;Adam S. Goodie

  • The effects of control on betting: paradoxical betting on items of high confidence with low value

    Adam S. Goodie

  • Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen With DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria: Results From a Diverse Community Sample of Gamblers

    Adam S. Goodie;James MacKillop;James MacKillop;Joshua D. Miller;Erica E. Fortune

  • Levels of theory-of-mind reasoning in competitive games

    Adam S. Goodie;Prashant Doshi;Diana L. Young

  • The Relationship Between Pathological Gambling and Sensation Seeking: The Role of Subscale Scores

    Erica E. Fortune;Adam S. Goodie

  • What does and does not alleviate base-rate neglect under direct experience

    Adam S. Goodie;Edmund Fantino

  • Frequent Card Playing and Pathological Gambling: The Utility of the Georgia Gambling Task and Iowa Gambling Task for Predicting Pathology

    Chad E. Lakey;Adam S. Goodie;W. Keith Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Keith Campbell
W. Keith Campbell University of Georgia
James MacKillop
James MacKillop McMaster University
Joshua D. Miller
Joshua D. Miller University of Georgia
Edmund Fantino
Edmund Fantino University of California, San Diego
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
Jennifer E. McDowell
Jennifer E. McDowell University of Georgia
Brett A. Clementz
Brett A. Clementz University of Georgia
Andreas Ortmann
Andreas Ortmann University of New South Wales
Lillian T. Eby
Lillian T. Eby University of Georgia
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees unlocks a wide variety of career pathways in mental health, education, and behavioral therapy. One promising route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a credential that is in high demand across the country. Each state and city can have unique requirements, so it’s crucial to understand what’s expected based on your location and goals.

For example, those interested in becoming a bcba in Jersey City must meet specific educational and supervised experience standards. Similarly, bcba certification requirements in Kansas City include comprehensive coursework and passing the BCBA exam. If your sights are set further south, you may want to review the Laredo bcba requirements to ensure you’re fully prepared. Aspiring behavioral analysts on the West Coast should also explore the steps involved in becoming a bcba in Las Vegas.

No matter where you plan to practice, an online psychology program can help lay the foundation for a career in behavior analysis, counseling, or other helping professions. Always verify your target state’s requirements to create a smooth path from degree to certification and licensure.

Best Scientists Citing Adam S. Goodie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles