World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
14744
World Ranking
7388
National Ranking
3220

Matthew Green publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Green sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 119 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matthew Green D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Green sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew Green is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, including Engineering, Materials Science, and Computer Science.

The scientist has contributed to several subfields, particularly Mechanical Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, and Polymers and Plastics. Their research topics cover a diverse range of areas such as Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies, Membrane Separation and Gas Transport, Cryptography and Data Security, Fuel Cells and Related Materials, Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies, Security and Verification in Computing, and Cryptographic Implementations and Security.

Matthew Green has published in a variety of venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Polymer
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Soft Matter

Their recent papers include:

  • Exfoliation of Quasi-Two-Dimensional Nanosheets of Metal Diborides, 2021, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • High Thermal Conductivity in Multiphase Liquid Metal and Silicon Carbide Soft Composites, 2021, Advanced Materials Interfaces
  • Metabolite releasing polymers control dendritic cell function by modulating their energy metabolism, 2020, Journal of Materials Chemistry B
  • Freestanding self-assembled sulfonated pentablock terpolymer membranes for high flux pervaporation desalination, 2020, Journal of Membrane Science
  • Direct Air Capture of CO2 via Ionic Liquids Derived from "Waste" Amino Acids, 2022, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Hoda Shokrollahzadeh Behbahani
  • Jae Sang Lee
  • Husain Mithaiwala
  • Meng Wang
  • Maximilian Zinkus

Matthew Green has also contributed to book publications, notably:

  • Direct Air Capture of CO2, 2023, published by American Chemical Society

Best Publications

  • Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin

    Eli Ben Sasson;Alessandro Chiesa;Christina Garman;Matthew Green

  • Improved proxy re-encryption schemes with applications to secure distributed storage

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Kevin Fu;Matthew Green;Susan Hohenberger

  • Zerocoin: Anonymous Distributed E-Cash from Bitcoin

    I. Miers;C. Garman;M. Green;A. D. Rubin

  • Identity-Based Proxy Re-encryption

    Matthew Green;Giuseppe Ateniese

  • Outsourcing the decryption of ABE ciphertexts

    Matthew Green;Susan Hohenberger;Brent Waters

  • Charm: a framework for rapidly prototyping cryptosystems

    Joseph A. Akinyele;Christina Garman;Ian Miers;Matthew W. Pagano

  • Imperfect Forward Secrecy: How Diffie-Hellman Fails in Practice

    David Adrian;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Zakir Durumeric;Pierrick Gaudry

  • Security analysis of a cryptographically-enabled RFID device

    Stephen C. Bono;Matthew Green;Adam Stubblefield;Ari Juels

  • Securing electronic medical records using attribute-based encryption on mobile devices

    Joseph A. Akinyele;Matthew W. Pagano;Matthew D. Green;Christoph U. Lehmann

  • Improved Proxy Re-Encryption Schemes with Applications to Secure Distributed Storage.

    Giuseppe Ateniese;Kevin Fu;Matthew Green;Susan Hohenberger

  • Practical Short Signature Batch Verification

    Anna Lisa Ferrara;Matthew Green;Susan Hohenberger;Michael Østergaard Pedersen

  • Bolt: Anonymous Payment Channels for Decentralized Currencies

    Matthew Green;Ian Miers

  • Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin.

    Eli Ben-Sasson;Alessandro Chiesa;Christina Garman;Matthew Green

  • Method for content-aware redirection and content renaming

    Charles D. Cranor;Raman Gopalakrishnan;Matthew D. Green;Charles Robert Kalmanek

  • Developers are Not the Enemy!: The Need for Usable Security APIs

    Matthew Green;Matthew Smith

  • Keys under doormats: mandating insecurity by requiring government access to all data and communications

    Hal Abelson;Ross Anderson;Steven Michael Bellovin;Josh Benaloh

  • Secure Sampling of Public Parameters for Succinct Zero Knowledge Proofs

    Eli Ben-Sasson;Alessandro Chiesa;Matthew Green;Eran Tromer

  • Blind Identity-Based Encryption and Simulatable Oblivious Transfer.

    Matthew Green;Susan Hohenberger

  • Decentralized Anonymous Credentials

    Christina Garman;Matthew Green;Ian Miers

  • On the practical exploitability of dual EC in TLS implementations

    Stephen Checkoway;Matthew Fredrikson;Ruben Niederhagen;Adam Everspaugh

  • ZEXE: Enabling Decentralized Private Computation

    Sean Bowe;Alessandro Chiesa;Matthew Green;Ian Miers

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Hohenberger
Susan Hohenberger Johns Hopkins University
Aviel D. Rubin
Aviel D. Rubin Johns Hopkins University
Alessandro Chiesa
Alessandro Chiesa École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Giuseppe Ateniese
Giuseppe Ateniese George Mason University
Karthikeyan Bhargavan
Karthikeyan Bhargavan French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Kevin Fu
Kevin Fu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eran Tromer
Eran Tromer Tel Aviv University
Jonathan Katz
Jonathan Katz University of Maryland, College Park
Hovav Shacham
Hovav Shacham The University of Texas at Austin
Matthew Smith
Matthew Smith University of Bonn

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online associates degrees can be a smart first step for those interested in computer science but seeking flexibility or a fast-track entry. These programs often offer foundational technical skills and can be completed in around two years, making them ideal for career changers or recent high school graduates.

For students mindful of cost, it’s worth considering the many affordable online courses available across the U.S. This route makes earning a recognized degree accessible without incurring heavy student debt.

Another important factor is eligibility. Some online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa provide valuable opportunities to learners with lower GPAs who want to pursue a tech career. These options help ensure nearly everyone has a chance to succeed in this rapidly evolving field.

A degree in computer science, similar to other STEM fields, opens doors to diverse roles such as software development, IT analysis, cybersecurity, and more. For those interested in broader possibilities, see what types of positions are available in fields like environmental science in this guide on what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Green

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles