World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
9417
World Ranking
5903
National Ranking
122

Karthikeyan Bhargavan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karthikeyan Bhargavan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 124 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Karthikeyan Bhargavan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karthikeyan Bhargavan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karthikeyan Bhargavan is affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France. Their research primarily focuses on several areas within computer science and engineering, with significant contributions to both theoretical and applied aspects of security and cryptography.

Their research spans multiple fields including:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these domains, their specific subfields of study include:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Signal Processing
  • Control and Systems Engineering

The main topics covered in their work are:

  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
  • Caching and Content Delivery

Karthikeyan Bhargavan has contributed to a number of research papers published in recognized venues including:

  • "A Symbolic Analysis of Privacy for TLS 1.3 with Encrypted Client Hello," 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • "SoK: Computer-Aided Cryptography," 2023, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
  • "Noise: A Library of Verified High-Performance Secure Channel Protocol Implementations," 2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
  • "KyberSlash: Exploiting secret-dependent division timings in Kyber implementations," 2025, IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
  • "A Mechanically Verified Garbage Collector for OCaml," 2025, Journal of Automated Reasoning

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers such as Abhishek Bichhawat, Franziskus Kiefer, Pedram Hosseyni, Ralf Küsters, and Guido Schmitz.

Their work also includes contributions to book publications, notably with Springer Science+Business Media through a publication titled "Progress in Cryptology - INDOCRYPT 2020," which was released in 2020.

The venues where they have published reflect a focus on security, cryptography, and automated reasoning, including:

  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
  • 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
  • IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
  • Journal of Automated Reasoning

Best Publications

  • Formal Verification of Smart Contracts: Short Paper

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Antoine Delignat-Lavaud;Cédric Fournet;Anitha Gollamudi

  • Imperfect Forward Secrecy: How Diffie-Hellman Fails in Practice

    David Adrian;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Zakir Durumeric;Pierrick Gaudry

  • Verified reference implementations of WS-Security protocols

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Cédric Fournet;Andrew D. Gordon

  • Dependent types and multi-monadic effects in F*

    Nikhil Swamy;Cătălin Hriţcu;Chantal Keller;Aseem Rastogi

  • A Messy State of the Union: Taming the Composite State Machines of TLS

    Benjamin Beurdouche;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Antoine Delignat-Lavaud;Cedric Fournet

  • Refinement types for secure implementations

    Jesper Bengtson;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Cédric Fournet;Andrew D. Gordon

  • Triple Handshakes and Cookie Cutters: Breaking and Fixing Authentication over TLS

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Antoine Delignat Lavaud;Cédric Fournet;Alfredo Pironti

  • Secure distributed programming with value-dependent types

    Nikhil Swamy;Juan Chen;Cédric Fournet;Pierre-Yves Strub

  • Formal verification of standards for distance vector routing protocols

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Davor Obradovic;Carl A. Gunter

  • Implementing TLS with Verified Cryptographic Security

    K. Bhargavan;C. Fournet;M. Kohlweiss;A. Pironti

  • HACL*: A Verified Modern Cryptographic Library.

    Jean Karim Zinzindohoué;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Jonathan Protzenko;Benjamin Beurdouche

  • Verified Models and Reference Implementations for the TLS 1.3 Standard Candidate

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Bruno Blanchet;Nadim Kobeissi

  • On the Practical (In-)Security of 64-bit Block Ciphers: Collision Attacks on HTTP over TLS and OpenVPN.

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Gaëtan Leurent

  • Verified interoperable implementations of security protocols

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Cédric Fournet;Andrew D. Gordon;Stephen Tse

  • Verified interoperable implementations of security protocols

    K. Bhargavan;C. Fournet;A.D. Gordon;S. Tse

  • Discovering concrete attacks on website authorization by formal analysis

    Chetan Bansal;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Antoine Delignat-Lavaud;Sergio Maffeis

  • Automated Verification for Secure Messaging Protocols and Their Implementations: A Symbolic and Computational Approach

    Nadim Kobeissi;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Bruno Blanchet

  • Modular verification of security protocol code by typing

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Cédric Fournet;Andrew D. Gordon

  • Cryptographically verified implementations for TLS

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Cédric Fournet;Ricardo Corin;Eugen Zalinescu

  • Transcript Collision Attacks: Breaking Authentication in TLS, IKE and SSH.

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Gaëtan Leurent

  • Secure distributed programming with value-dependent types

    Nikhil Swamy;Juan Chen;Cédric Fournet;Pierre-Yves Strub

  • A messy state of the union: taming the composite state machines of TLS

    Benjamin Beurdouche;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Antoine Delignat-Lavaud;Cédric Fournet

Frequent Co-Authors

Cédric Fournet
Cédric Fournet Microsoft (United States)
Andrew D. Gordon
Andrew D. Gordon Microsoft (United States)
Markulf Kohlweiss
Markulf Kohlweiss University of Edinburgh
Nikhil Swamy
Nikhil Swamy Microsoft (United States)
Carl A. Gunter
Carl A. Gunter University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Marc Shapiro
Marc Shapiro Sorbonne University
Matthew Green
Matthew Green Johns Hopkins University
Bruno Blanchet
Bruno Blanchet French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Bryan Parno
Bryan Parno Carnegie Mellon University
Oleg Sokolsky
Oleg Sokolsky University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Computer Science serves as the foundation for many in-demand professions. If you’re exploring alternative or supplemental online degrees, there are several options offering flexibility and strong career outlooks.

For those interested in security, a master's degree in cybersecurity online can lead to roles in IT security, risk analysis, and forensics. Construction-focused professionals might pursue an affordable online construction management degree to move into project management and leadership positions in the building sector.

If your interests lie in justice or compliance, the cheapest online master's degree in criminal justice can prepare you for administrative, supervisory, or analytical roles. Alternatively, numbers-driven students often excel in finance with an online accounting degree, opening doors to jobs in accounting, auditing, and financial management.

Each of these online degrees supports career mobility and allows you to gain skills at your own pace, potentially leading to high-paying and stable careers related to or alongside Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Karthikeyan Bhargavan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles