World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4753
World Ranking
11767
National Ranking
582

Ralf Küsters publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf Küsters sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 114 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ralf Küsters D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf Küsters sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ralf Küsters is affiliated with the University of Stuttgart in Germany and specializes in Computer Science, with a particular focus on topics related to cryptography and data security. Their research contributions span multiple interconnected fields, including artificial intelligence, information systems, computer networks and communications, computer vision and pattern recognition, and computational theory and mathematics.

Their main research topics include:

  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Küsters has authored a number of recent papers, covering foundational models and security analyses, including:

  • "The IITM Model: A Simple and Expressive Model for Universal Composability," 2020, Journal of Cryptology
  • "The IITM model: a simple and expressive model for universal composability," 2020, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
  • "Kryvos," 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • "Publicly Accountable Robust Multi-Party Computation," 2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
  • "A Formal Security Analysis of the W3C Web Payment APIs: Attacks and Verification," 2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)

Their research has appeared prominently in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Cryptology
  • 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

Küsters has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Pascal Reisert
  • Daniel Rausch
  • Mayar Elfares
  • Pedram Hosseyni
  • Tim Würtele

In addition to articles, Küsters has contributed to book publications under Springer Science+Business Media, with titles such as "Progress in Cryptology - INDOCRYPT 2021" (2021) and "Electronic Voting" (2020).

Best Publications

  • An NP decision procedure for protocol insecurity with XOR

    Yannick Chevalier;Ralf Küsters;Michaël Rusinowitch;Mathieu Turuani

  • Computing Least Common Subsumers in Description Logics with Existential Restrictions

    Franz Baader;Ralf Kusters;Ralf Molitor

  • Accountability: Definition and Relationship to Verifiability.

    Ralf Küsters;Tomasz Truderung;Andreas Vogt

  • A Comprehensive Formal Security Analysis of OAuth 2.0

    Daniel Fett;Ralf Küsters;Guido Schmitz

  • Reducing Protocol Analysis with XOR to the XOR-Free Case in the Horn Theory Based Approach

    Ralf Küsters;Tomasz Truderung

  • Deciding the Security of Protocols with Diffie-Hellman Exponentiation and Products in Exponents

    Yannick Chevalier;Ralf Küsters;Michaël Rusinowitch;Mathieu Turuani

  • Non-standard inferences in description logics

    Ralf Küsters

  • Using ProVerif to Analyze Protocols with Diffie-Hellman Exponentiation

    Ralf Küsters;Tomasz Truderung

  • Clash Attacks on the Verifiability of E-Voting Systems.

    Ralf Küsters;Tomasz Truderung;Andreas Vogt

  • SoK: Verifiability Notions for E-Voting Protocols

    Veronique Cortier;David Galindo;Ralf Kusters;Johannes Muller

  • Simulation-Based Security with Inexhaustible Interactive Turing Machines.

    Ralf Küsters

  • Approximation and difference in description logics

    Sebastian Brandt;Ralf Küsters;Anni-Yasmin Turhan

  • An Expressive Model for the Web Infrastructure: Definition and Application to the Browser ID SSO System

    Daniel Fett;Ralf Küsters;Guido Schmitz

  • Matching in description logics

    Franz Baader;Ralf Küsters;Alexander Borgida;Deborah L. McGuinness

  • A game-based definition of coercion resistance and its applications

    Ralf Küsters;Tomasz Truderung;Andreas Vogt

  • The Web SSO Standard OpenID Connect: In-depth Formal Security Analysis and Security Guidelines

    Daniel Fett;Ralf Kusters;Guido Schmitz

  • Computing the Least Common Subsumer and the Most Specific Concept in the Presence of Cyclic ALN-Concept Descriptions

    Franz Baader;Ralf Küsters

  • Extensions to description logics

    Franz Baader;Ralf Küsters;Frank Wolter

  • Rewriting concepts using terminologies

    Franz Baader;Ralf Küsters;Ralf Molitor

  • Unification in a Description Logic with Transitive Closure of Roles

    Franz Baader;Ralf Küsters

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz Baader
Franz Baader TU Dresden
Michael Backes
Michael Backes University of Oxford
Karthikeyan Bhargavan
Karthikeyan Bhargavan French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Véronique Cortier
Véronique Cortier Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Alexander Borgida
Alexander Borgida Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John C. Mitchell
John C. Mitchell Stanford University
Bogdan Warinschi
Bogdan Warinschi University of Bristol
Anupam Datta
Anupam Datta Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Computer Science opens the door to various related fields, many of which now offer flexible, affordable online degrees. Exploring these pathways can help you specialize or diversify your skill set—even while balancing work or other commitments.

If you’re interested in combining technology with physical systems, an online degree for mechanical engineering offers hands-on skills in design and manufacturing. For those drawn to fundamental science with applications in computing, earning a physics degree online can be a powerful way to understand the principles behind hardware and emerging tech fields.

Data-driven roles are also booming. If quantitative analysis and big data excite you, the cheapest master in data science programs can help you advance without breaking the bank. Likewise, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering is ideal if you want to work with electronics, robotics, or telecommunications.

These related degrees can expand your expertise and improve your career options—all from the convenience of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Ralf Küsters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles