World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7817
World Ranking
9216
National Ranking
3924

Catherine Meadows publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Meadows sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 169 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Catherine Meadows D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Meadows sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catherine Meadows is affiliated with the United States Naval Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with a significant emphasis on subfields such as artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, information systems, and signal processing.

The main topics covered in Meadows's body of work include:

  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Coding theory and cryptography

Meadows has contributed to a number of research publications with notable appearances in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University) and Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science. Recent papers include:

  • "CryptoSolve: Towards a Tool for the Symbolic Analysis of Cryptographic Algorithms," 2022, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • "Protocol Analysis with Time," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A Logic of Sattestation," 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors collaborating on Meadows's research are:

  • Santiago Escobar
  • José Meseguer
  • Damián Aparicio-Sánchez
  • Julia Sapiña
  • Lin Hai

The scientist's work has appeared predominantly in open-access repositories and theoretical computer science proceedings, indicating an engagement with foundational and applied aspects of cryptographic systems and security protocols. Their publications span over two decades with multiple contributions in the field of computer science, especially in security-related domains.

Best Publications

  • The NRL Protocol Analyzer: An Overview☆

    Catherine A. Meadows

  • Security of ramp schemes

    G R Blakley;Catherine Meadows

  • Formal Verification of Cryptographic Protocols: A Survey

    Catherine Meadows

  • Three systems for cryptographic protocol analysis

    R. Kemmerer;C. Meadows;J. Millen

  • Formal methods for cryptographic protocol analysis: emerging issues and trends

    C. Meadows

  • Maude-NPA: Cryptographic Protocol Analysis Modulo Equational Properties

    Santiago Escobar;Catherine Meadows;José Meseguer

  • A formal framework and evaluation method for network denial of service

    C. Meadows

  • Applying Formal Methods to the Analysis of a Key Management Protocol

    Catherine Meadows

  • A More Efficient Cryptographic Matchmaking Protocol for Use in the Absence of a Continuously Available Third Party

    Catherine Meadows

  • Analysis of the Internet Key Exchange protocol using the NRL Protocol Analyzer

    C. Meadows

  • Preventing wormhole attacks on wireless ad hoc networks: a graph theoretic approach

    L. Lazos;R. Poovendran;C. Meadows;P. Syverson

  • A cost-based framework for analysis of denial of service in networks

    Catherine Meadows

  • Security and Privacy in Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks

    Frank Stajano;Catherine Meadows;Srdjan Capkun;Tyler Moore

  • Open issues in formal methods for cryptographic protocol analysis

    C. Meadows

  • Analyzing the Needham-Schroeder Public-Key Protocol: A Comparison of Two Approaches

    Catherine Meadows

  • Fingerprinting long forgiving messages

    G. R. Blakley;Catherine Meadows;George B. Purdy

  • A rewriting-based inference system for the NRL Protocol analyzer and its meta-logical properties

    Santiago Escobar;Catherine Meadows;José Meseguer

  • Model Checking Security Protocols

    David A. Basin;Cas Cremers;Catherine A. Meadows

  • A System for the Specification and Verification of Key Management Protocols.

    Catherine A. Meadows

  • Distance Bounding Protocols: Authentication Logic Analysis and Collusion Attacks

    Catherine A. Meadows;Radha Poovendran;Dusko Pavlovic;LiWu Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

José Meseguer
José Meseguer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paul Syverson
Paul Syverson United States Naval Research Laboratory
Christopher S. Lynch
Christopher S. Lynch University of California, Riverside
Deepak Kapur
Deepak Kapur University of New Mexico
Sushil Jajodia
Sushil Jajodia George Mason University
Ran Canetti
Ran Canetti Boston University
Roberto Segala
Roberto Segala University of Verona
Tyler Moore
Tyler Moore University of Tulsa
Srdjan Capkun
Srdjan Capkun ETH Zurich
Radha Poovendran
Radha Poovendran University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right computer science program opens doors to numerous career options in tech and beyond. If you are looking for flexibility, online degrees provide convenient ways to earn credentials while balancing other responsibilities.

For those seeking a quick start, consider exploring accelerated associates degree online programs. These allow you to complete foundational studies in as little as six months, making it possible to join the workforce or continue toward a bachelor's degree sooner.

If cost is your top priority, look into the cheapest online business management degree and least expensive online bachelor's degree programs. These options ensure you receive a quality education while minimizing debt, enabling you to freely pursue your career goals upon graduation.

Tech-minded students should also consider an online engineer degree to open pathways in software development, project management, and engineering roles. By researching these online alternatives, you can find a path that fits both your ambitions and your budget.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Meadows

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles