World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip Hallinger

Philip Hallinger

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
92
Citations
46217
World Ranking
157
National Ranking
1

Philip Hallinger publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Hallinger sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 315 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Philip Hallinger D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Hallinger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip Hallinger is affiliated with Mahidol University in Thailand and has an extensive publication record in the field of social sciences, with a primary focus on education. Their research spans multiple subfields including education, management, monitoring, policy and law, developmental and educational psychology, sociology and political science, and information systems and management.

Their work concentrates mainly on topics such as teacher education and leadership studies, sustainability in higher education, environmental education and sustainability, education and critical thinking development, educational assessment and improvement, collaborative teaching and inclusion, and educational games and gamification.

Frequent publication venues for Hallinger include:

  • Educational Management Administration & Leadership
  • Sustainability
  • Educational Administration Quarterly
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Education Sciences

Among the recent papers authored by Philip Hallinger are:

  • 'Are principals instructional leaders yet?' A science map of the knowledge base on instructional leadership, 1940-2018 (2020), Scientometrics
  • Mapping the Landscape and Structure of Research on Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review (2020), Sustainability
  • A bibliometric review of research on simulations and serious games used in educating for sustainability, 1997-2019 (2020), Journal of Cleaner Production

Hallinger has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Shengnan Liu, Chatchai Chatpinyakoop, David Kongpiwatana Narong, Pwint Nee Aung, and Parinya Showanasai.

Best Publications

  • Reassessing the Principal's Role in School Effectiveness: A Review of Empirical Research, 1980-1995

    Philip Hallinger;Ronald H. Heck

  • Leading Educational Change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership

    Philip Hallinger

  • Exploring the Principal's Contribution to School Effectiveness: 1980‐1995∗

    Philip Hallinger;Ronald H. Heck

  • Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals.

    Philip Hallinger;Joseph F. Murphy

  • Instructional Leadership and the School Principal: A Passing Fancy that Refuses to Fade Away

    Philip Hallinger

  • School Context, Principal Leadership, and Student Reading Achievement

    Philip Hallinger;Leonard Bickman;Ken Davis

  • Collaborative leadership and school improvement: understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning

    Philip Hallinger;Ronald H. Heck

  • The Social Context of Effective Schools.

    Philip Hallinger;Joseph F. Murphy

  • Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research

    Philip Hallinger

  • The Evolving Role of American Principals: From Managerial to Instructional to Transformational Leaders

    Philip Hallinger

  • Assessing the Contribution of Distributed Leadership to School Improvement and Growth in Math Achievement

    Ronald H. Heck;Philip Hallinger

  • Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration

    K Leithwood;P Hallinger;G Furman;K Riley

  • The Study of Educational Leadership and Management: Where Does the Field Stand Today?.

    Ronald H. Heck;Philip Hallinger

  • Leadership for Learning: Does Collaborative Leadership Make a Difference in School Improvement?

    Philip 賀靈傑 Hallinger;Ronald H. Heck

  • Developing Instructional Leadership

    Philip Hallinger

  • Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership

    Philip Hallinger

  • The Principal’s Role in School Effectiveness: An Assessment of Methodological Progress, 1980–1995

    Philip Hallinger;Philip Hallinger;Philip Hallinger;Ronald H. Heck;Ronald H. Heck;Ronald H. Heck

  • Successful principal leadership in times of change : an international perspective

    Day, Christopher, Acp;Kenneth A. Leithwood;Philip Hallinger

  • What Do You Call People With Visions? The Role of Vision, Mission and Goals in School Leadership and Improvement

    Philip Hallinger;Ronald H. Heck

  • A Bibliometric Review of Research on Educational Administration: Science Mapping the Literature, 1960 to 2018.

    Philip Hallinger;Philip Hallinger;Jasna Kovačević

  • Characteristics of Instructionally Effective School Districts

    Joseph Murphy;Philip Hallinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan David Walker
Allan David Walker Education University of Hong Kong
Ronald H. Heck
Ronald H. Heck University of Hawaii at Manoa
Joseph Murphy
Joseph Murphy Vanderbilt University
David A. Ralston
David A. Ralston Florida International University
Marina Dabić
Marina Dabić University of Zagreb
Kenneth Leithwood
Kenneth Leithwood University of Toronto
Alma Harris
Alma Harris Cardiff Metropolitan University
Leonard Bickman
Leonard Bickman Vanderbilt University
Pamela L. Perrewé
Pamela L. Perrewé Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up many rewarding online degree options and career opportunities. If you are passionate about supporting individuals and communities, there are accredited programs designed to fit your interests and schedule.

Those interested in counseling can pursue their qualifications through cacrep accredited programs, which offer high-quality, rigorous training for aspiring professional counselors. For those drawn to relationship dynamics and family therapy, there are flexible online marriage and family therapy graduate programs that prepare students for licensure and real-world practice.

Students looking to enter psychology can benefit from online degrees for psychology, which lead to diverse roles in research, education, and mental health services. Social work remains a core path, with accessible msw programs supporting aspiring social workers.

These pathways offer flexible, affordable, and reputable options to launch or advance your career in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Hallinger

Trending Scientists