World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 36 1572 1452 41 40 155 6931

Peter Lund publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Lund between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Lund published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2022. 28 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2022. 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 8 publications
2003 2025

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Lund: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 4
2004 4
2005 3
2006 6
2007 9
2008 5
2009 2
2010 8
2011 2
2012 7
2013 13
2014 7
2015 9
2016 12
2017 11
2018 16
2019 15
2020 12
2021 11
2022 22
2023 15
2024 20
2025 8
Total 221
Download as CSV

Peter Lund publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Lund sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–158 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 155 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74 155
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Peter Lund D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Lund sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112 36
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Lund is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their research primarily falls within the field of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on subfields including Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Ecology, Animal Science and Zoology, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics of their scientific work encompass:

  • Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Lund's recent publications include:

  • Feeding up to 91% concentrate to Holstein and Jersey dairy cows: Effects on enteric methane emission, rumen fermentation and bacterial community, digestibility, production, and feeding behavior (2022, Journal of Dairy Science)
  • Effects of dietary fat, nitrate, and 3-nitrooxypropanol and their combinations on methane emission, feed intake, and milk production in dairy cows (2023, Journal of Dairy Science)
  • Between-cow variation in the components of feed efficiency (2020, Journal of Dairy Science)
  • Prediction of nitrogen excretion from data on dairy cows fed a wide range of diets compiled in an intercontinental database: A meta-analysis (2022, Journal of Dairy Science)
  • The effects of energy metabolism variables on feed efficiency in respiration chamber studies with lactating dairy cows (2020, Journal of Dairy Science)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lund include:

  • Martin Riis Weisbjerg
  • Anne Louise Frydendahl Hellwing
  • Marianne Johansen
  • Mogens Larsen
  • Morten Maigaard

Lund has published extensively in specific venues, notably:

  • Journal of Dairy Science (30 publications)
  • Livestock Science (8 publications)
  • Animal Feed Science and Technology (6 publications)
  • Animal - science proceedings (6 publications)
  • JDS Communications (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range

    Gemma Henderson;Faith Cox;Siva Ganesh;Arjan Jonker

  • Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen

    Morten Poulsen;Clarissa Schwab;Bent Borg Jensen;Ricarda M. Engberg

  • Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database

    Mutian Niu;Ermias Kebreab;Alexander N. Hristov;Joonpyo Oh

  • Methane and carbon dioxide ratio in excreted air for quantification of the methane production from ruminants

    J. Madsen;B.S. Bjerg;T. Hvelplund;M.R. Weisbjerg

  • Whey and casein labeled with l-[1-13C]leucine and muscle protein synthesis: effect of resistance exercise and protein ingestion

    Søren Reitelseder;Jakob Agergaard;Simon Doessing;Ida C Helmark

  • Symposium review: Uncertainties in enteric methane inventories, measurement techniques, and prediction models

    A. N. Hristov;Ermias Kebreab;M. Niu;J. Oh

  • Effect of dietary nitrate level on enteric methane production, hydrogen emission, rumen fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in dairy cows

    D.W. Olijhoek;A.L.F. Hellwing;M. Brask;M.R. Weisbjerg

  • Enteric methane production, digestibility and rumen fermentation in dairy cows fed different forages with and without rapeseed fat supplementation

    M. Brask;P. Lund;A.L.F. Hellwing;M. Poulsen

  • Dietary effects on the composition and plant utilization of nitrogen in dairy cattle manure

    P. Sørensen;M. R. Weisbjerg;P. Lund

  • Review: Selecting for improved feed efficiency and reduced methane emissions in dairy cattle.

    P. Løvendahl;G. F. Difford;B. Li;M. G. G. Chagunda

  • Erratum: Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range

    Unknown

  • Holistic Assessment of Rumen Microbiome Dynamics through Quantitative Metatranscriptomics Reveals Multifunctional Redundancy during Key Steps of Anaerobic Feed Degradation.

    Andrea Söllinger;Andrea Söllinger;Alexander Tøsdal Tveit;Morten Poulsen;Samantha Joan Noel

  • Technical note: Test of a low-cost and animal-friendly system for measuring methane emissions from dairy cows

    Anne Louise Frydendahl Hellwing;Peter Lund;Martin Riis Weisbjerg;Maike Brask

  • Effect of expander processing on fractional rate of maize and barley starch degradation in the rumen of dairy cows estimated using rumen evacuation and in situ techniques

    R Tothi;P Lund;M.R Weisbjerg;T Hvelplund

  • Methane production and digestion of different physical forms of rapeseed as fat supplements in dairy cows.

    M. Brask;P. Lund;M.R. Weisbjerg;A.L. F. Hellwing

  • Digestion site of starch from cereals and legumes in lactating dairy cows

    M. Larsen;P. Lund;M.R. Weisbjerg;T. Hvelplund

  • RNA-Seq transcriptomics and pathway analyses reveal potential regulatory genes and molecular mechanisms in high- and low-residual feed intake in Nordic dairy cattle

    M. S. Salleh;G. Mazzoni;J. K. Höglund;D. W. Olijhoek

  • Methane production, rumen fermentation, and diet digestibility of Holstein and Jersey dairy cows being divergent in residual feed intake and fed at 2 forage-to-concentrate ratios.

    D.W. Olijhoek;P. Løvendahl;J. Lassen;A.L.F. Hellwing

  • Estimation of grass intake on pasture for dairy cows using tightly and loosely mounted di- and tri-axial accelerometers combined with bite count

    F. W. Oudshoorn;C. Cornou;A. L. F. Hellwing;H. H. Hansen

  • Rumen and Fecal Microbial Community Structure of Holstein and Jersey Dairy Cows as Affected by Breed, Diet, and Residual Feed Intake.

    Samantha J. Noel;Dana W. Olijhoek;Farran Mclean;Peter Løvendahl

  • The acute effect of addition of nitrate on in vitro and in vivo methane emission in dairy cows

    P. Lund;R. Dahl;H. J. Yang;A. L. F. Hellwing

  • Feces composition and manure derived methane yield from dairy cows: Influence of diet with focus on fat supplement and roughage type

    Henrik Bjarne Møller;Verónica Moset;Maike Brask;Martin Riis Weisbjerg

  • Evaluation of a gas in vitro system for predicting methane production in vivo

    Rebecca Danielsson;Mohammad Ramin;Jan Bertilsson;Peter Lund

  • Dietary Nitrate for Methane Mitigation Leads to Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Dairy Cows

    Søren O. Petersen;Anne Louise Frydendahl Hellwing;Maike Brask;Ole Højberg

  • Digestible NDF is selectively retained in the rumen of dairy cows compared to indigestible NDF

    P. Lund;M.R. Weisbjerg;T. Hvelplund

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Riis Weisbjerg
Martin Riis Weisbjerg Aarhus University
A.L.F. Hellwing
A.L.F. Hellwing Aarhus University
Torben Hvelplund
Torben Hvelplund Aarhus University
Jan Dijkstra
Jan Dijkstra Wageningen University & Research
Pekka Huhtanen
Pekka Huhtanen Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Maguy Eugène
Maguy Eugène INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Christopher K. Reynolds
Christopher K. Reynolds University of Reading
Hélène Soyeurt
Hélène Soyeurt Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech
Nicolas Gengler
Nicolas Gengler Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Animal Science and Veterinary studies opens doors to diverse related fields that blend biology, health, and management. For those interested in leadership roles within sports or animal-related facilities, understanding athletic director education requirements can provide a pathway to managing teams and organizations with a focus on wellness and performance.

Individuals seeking a health-oriented career may also consider an exercise science degree online. This program enhances knowledge of physical health and rehabilitation, complementing animal welfare professions or opening doors to human health sciences.

For those interested in psychological aspects of behavior, earning one of the bcba programs offers training in applied behavior analysis, crucial for working with both humans and animals in therapeutic settings.

Lastly, for careers focused on mental health and educational support, school psychology programs online accredited by nasp provide essential credentials and knowledge to support developmental and behavioral health in diverse populations, which can be a complementary field for animal science professionals looking to broaden their expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Lund

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles