World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 42 1037 959 310 267 176 5094

David G. Renter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David G. Renter between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David G. Renter published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2011. 23 of the 194 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2011. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 13 publications
2000 2025

194 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David G. Renter: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 3
2005 2
2006 2
2007 8
2008 13
2009 14
2010 13
2011 15
2012 6
2013 8
2014 7
2015 11
2016 13
2017 7
2018 11
2019 4
2020 9
2021 10
2022 6
2023 4
2024 10
2025 13
Total 194
Download as CSV

David G. Renter publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Renter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–178 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 176 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63 176
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

David G. Renter D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Renter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74 42
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

David G. Renter is affiliated with Kansas State University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Animal Science and Zoology, Microbiology, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, and Genetics.

The scientist's work covers multiple key topics in the field of veterinary and animal science, with extensive contributions to:

  • Microbial infections and disease research
  • Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Pharmacological Effects and Assays
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies

David G. Renter has published numerous papers, with notable recent works including:

  • "Predictive modeling of bovine respiratory disease outcomes in feedlot cattle: A narrative review" (2021, Livestock Science)
  • "Net return distributions when metaphylaxis is used to control bovine respiratory disease in high health-risk cattle" (2020, Translational Animal Science)
  • "Comprehensive Outcomes Affected by Antimicrobial Metaphylaxis of Feedlot Calves at Medium-Risk for Bovine Respiratory Disease from a Randomized Controlled Trial" (2023, Veterinary Sciences)
  • "Estimation of foot-and-mouth disease windborne transmission risk from USA beef feedlots" (2021, Preventive Veterinary Medicine)
  • "A pooled analysis of six large-pen feedlot studies: effects of a noncoated initial and terminal implant compared with a single initial and delayed-release implant on arrival in feedlot heifers" (2020, Translational Animal Science)

Their frequent publication venues indicate a strong presence in the field, including the following journals:

  • Translational Animal Science
  • Journal of Animal Science
  • Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
  • The Bovine Practitioner
  • Frontiers in Veterinary Science

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Natalia Cernicchiaro
  • J. P. Hutcheson
  • Lucas M. Horton
  • M. N. Streeter
  • David E. Amrine

David G. Renter's work spans key investigations into disease outcomes in livestock populations, antimicrobial use, and epidemiological risk assessment, contributing to the broader understanding of animal health management and veterinary sciences.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of three-dimensional accelerometers to monitor and classify behavior patterns in cattle

    B. Robert;B. J. White;D. G. Renter;R. L. Larson

  • Bayesian estimation of the performance of using clinical observations and harvest lung lesions for diagnosing bovine respiratory disease in post-weaned beef calves.

    Brad J. White;David G. Renter

  • Diversity, Frequency, and Persistence of Escherichia coli O157 Strains from Range Cattle Environments

    David G. Renter;Jan M. Sargeant;Richard D. Oberst;Mansour Samadpour

  • A Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection of Salmonella in a Wide Variety of Food and Food-Animal Matrices†

    V. M. Bohaychuk;G. E. Gensler;M. E. McFALL;R. K. King

  • Analysis of modern technologies commonly used in beef cattle production: conventional beef production versus nonconventional production using meta-analysis.

    B. W. Wileman;D. U. Thomson;C. D. Reinhardt;D. G. Renter

  • Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle

    M. E. Jacob;J. T. Fox;S. K. Narayanan;J. S. Drouillard

  • ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7 IN FREE-RANGING DEER IN NEBRASKA

    David G. Renter;Jan M. Sargeant;Scott E. Hygnstorm;Jeff D. Hoffman

  • Serial evaluation of physiologic, pathological, and behavioral changes related to disease progression of experimentally induced Mannheimia haemolytica pneumonia in postweaned calves.

    Gregg A. Hanzlicek;Brad J. White;Derek Mosier;David G. Renter

  • Feed additives for swine: Fact sheets – prebiotics and probiotics, and phytogenics

    Jay Y. Jacela;Joel M. DeRouchey;Michael D. Tokach;Robert D. Goodband

  • Feed additives for swine: Fact sheets – high dietary levels of copper and zinc for young pigs, and phytase

    Jay Y. Jacela;Joel M. DeRouchey;Michael D. Tokach;Robert D. Goodband

  • Associations between the distance traveled from sale barns to commercial feedlots in the United States and overall performance, risk of respiratory disease, and cumulative mortality in feeder cattle during 1997 to 2009

    N. Cernicchiaro;B. J. White;D. G. Renter;A. H. Babcock

  • Effects of Dried Distillers' Grain on Fecal Prevalence and Growth of Escherichia coli O157 in Batch Culture Fermentations from Cattle†

    M. E. Jacob;J. T. Fox;J. S. Drouillard;D. G. Renter

  • Feedlot health and performance effects associated with the timing of respiratory disease treatment.

    A. H. Babcock;B. J. White;S. S. Dritz;D. U. Thomson

  • Evaluation of two-dimensional accelerometers to monitor behavior of beef calves after castration

    Brad J White;Johann F Coetzee;David G Renter;Abram H Babcock

  • A Comparison of Culture- and PCR-Based Methods to Detect Six Major Non-O157 Serogroups of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle Feces.

    Lance W. Noll;Pragathi B. Shridhar;Diana M. Dewsbury;Xiaorong Shi

  • Summer and Winter Prevalence of Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157 in Feces of Feedlot Cattle

    Diana M.A. Dewsbury;David G. Renter;Pragathi B. Shridhar;Lance W. Noll

  • Potential associations between fecal shedding of Salmonella in feedlot cattle treated for apparent respiratory disease and subsequent adverse health outcomes

    Mohammad Jahangir Alam;David G. Renter;Samuel E. Ives;Daniel U. Thomson

  • Associations between weather conditions during the first 45 days after feedlot arrival and daily respiratory disease risks in autumn-placed feeder cattle in the United States.

    N. Cernicchiaro;D. G. Renter;B. J. White;A. H. Babcock

  • Evaluation of economic and performance outcomes associated with the number of treatments after an initial diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in commercial feeder cattle.

    Natalia Cernicchiaro;Brad J. White;David G. Renter;Abram H. Babcock

  • Comparison of tulathromycin and tilmicosin on the prevalence and severity of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle in association with feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and economic factors.

    T. C. Tennant;S. E. Ives;L. B. Harper;D. G. Renter

  • Efficacy of a vaccine and a direct-fed microbial against fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a randomized pen-level field trial of commercial feedlot cattle.

    Charley A. Cull;Zachary D. Paddock;T.G. Nagaraja;Nora M. Bello

  • Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: epidemiology and ecology in bovine production environments.

    David G Renter;Jan M Sargeant

Frequent Co-Authors

Tiruvoor G. Nagaraja
Tiruvoor G. Nagaraja Kansas State University
Jan M. Sargeant
Jan M. Sargeant University of Guelph
Michael D. Tokach
Michael D. Tokach Kansas State University
Robert D. Goodband
Robert D. Goodband Kansas State University
Joel M. DeRouchey
Joel M. DeRouchey Kansas State University
W. T. Nichols
W. T. Nichols MSD (United States)
James S. Drouillard
James S. Drouillard Kansas State University
Steve S Dritz
Steve S Dritz Kansas State University
Bruce A. Wagner
Bruce A. Wagner Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
David A. Dargatz
David A. Dargatz Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring degrees related to Animal Science and Veterinary studies can open doors to diverse career opportunities. For those interested in animal welfare and behavior, pursuing specialized education can enhance job prospects and earning potential. For example, earning an online masters in marriage and family therapy may seem unrelated at first, but it highlights the interdisciplinary approaches found in animal behavior and human-animal interaction sectors.

Advanced education is also vital in counseling roles connected to animal care and therapy. Students aiming for the highest level of expertise might consider the cheapest online phd in counseling, which offers flexible options to deepen understanding in related areas such as emotional support and rehabilitation.

For those passionate about working with animals, there are many high-paying career paths. The guide on high paying jobs with animals details roles such as wildlife biologists, veterinarians, and animal nutritionists, showcasing the variety and rewards in the field.

Additionally, leadership roles in athletic and animal-related organizations are attainable through strategic career moves. Learning about the athletic director salary and career pathways can provide valuable insights for individuals looking to combine management skills with animal science expertise.

Best Scientists Citing David G. Renter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles