World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
26625
World Ranking
8945
National Ranking
685

Marcus Bantscheff publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Bantscheff sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Marcus Bantscheff D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Bantscheff sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcus Bantscheff is affiliated with GlaxoSmithKline in the United Kingdom, focusing on research at the intersection of biochemistry, medicine, and chemistry. Their work spans multiple fields and subfields within the life sciences, emphasizing molecular biology and advanced analytical methods.

The main fields of study associated with Bantscheff's research include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine
  • Chemistry

More specific subfields within these areas cover:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Spectroscopy
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Cell Biology

The scientist's research topics are detailed as follows:

  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics

Bantscheff has contributed to scholarly works published in prominent venues, frequently appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Nature Methods
  • Communications Biology
  • Science Advances

Recent publications include:

  • "Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the Arabidopsis proteome," 2020, Nature
  • "Selective targeting of BD1 and BD2 of the BET proteins in cancer and immunoinflammation," 2020, Science
  • "The emerging role of mass spectrometry-based proteomics in drug discovery," 2022, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
  • "Meltome atlas-thermal proteome stability across the tree of life," 2020, Nature Methods
  • "Discovery of a first-in-class reversible DNMT1-selective inhibitor with improved tolerability and efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia," 2021, Nature Cancer

Bantscheff often collaborates with the following coauthors:

  • Thilo Werner
  • H. Christian Eberl
  • Sonja Ghidelli-Disse
  • Nico Zinn
  • Gerard Drewes

Best Publications

  • Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review

    Marcus Bantscheff;Markus Schirle;Gavain Sweetman;Jens Rick

  • Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome

    Mathias Wilhelm;Judith Schlegl;Hannes Hahne;Amin Moghaddas Gholami

  • Inhibition of BET recruitment to chromatin as an effective treatment for MLL-fusion leukaemia

    Mark A. Dawson;Rab K. Prinjha;Antje Dittmann;George Giotopoulos

  • Tracking cancer drugs in living cells by thermal profiling of the proteome

    Mikhail M. Savitski;Friedrich B. M. Reinhard;Holger Franken;Thilo Werner

  • Quantitative chemical proteomics reveals mechanisms of action of clinical ABL kinase inhibitors

    Marcus Bantscheff;Dirk Eberhard;Yann Abraham;Sonja Bastuck

  • Catalytic in vivo protein knockdown by small-molecule PROTACs

    Daniel P Bondeson;Alina Mares;Ian E D Smith;Eunhwa Ko

  • A selective jumonji H3K27 demethylase inhibitor modulates the proinflammatory macrophage response

    Laurens Kruidenier;Chun-wa Chung;Zhongjun Cheng;John Liddle

  • Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present

    Marcus Bantscheff;Simone Lemeer;Mikhail M. Savitski;Bernhard Kuster;Bernhard Kuster

  • Chemoproteomics profiling of HDAC inhibitors reveals selective targeting of HDAC complexes

    Marcus Bantscheff;Carsten Hopf;Mikhail M Savitski;Antje Dittmann

  • Design of amidobenzimidazole STING receptor agonists with systemic activity

    J.M. Ramanjulu;G.S. Pesiridis;J. Yang;N. Concha

  • Thermal proteome profiling for unbiased identification of direct and indirect drug targets using multiplexed quantitative mass spectrometry

    Holger Franken;Toby Mathieson;Dorothee Childs;Gavain M A Sweetman

  • Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the Arabidopsis proteome.

    Julia Mergner;Martin Frejno;Markus List;Michael Papacek

  • Increased expression of BIN1 mediates Alzheimer genetic risk by modulating tau pathology.

    J Chapuis;F Hansmannel;M Gistelinck;A Mounier

  • A scalable approach for protein false discovery rate estimation in large proteomic data sets

    Mikhail M. Savitski;Mathias Wilhelm;Hannes Hahne;Bernhard Kuster;Bernhard Kuster

  • Selective targeting of BD1 and BD2 of the BET proteins in cancer and immunoinflammation

    Omer Gilan;Omer Gilan;Inmaculada Rioja;Kathy Knezevic;Matthew J. Bell

  • Systematic analysis of protein turnover in primary cells

    Toby Mathieson;Holger Franken;Jan Kosinski;Nils Kurzawa

  • Confident Phosphorylation Site Localization Using the Mascot Delta Score

    Mikhail M. Savitski;Simone Lemeer;Markus Boesche;Manja Lang

  • Measuring and managing ratio compression for accurate iTRAQ/TMT quantification.

    Mikhail M. Savitski;Toby Mathieson;Nico Zinn;Gavain Sweetman

  • Ion coalescence of neutron encoded TMT 10-plex reporter ions.

    Thilo Werner;Gavain Sweetman;Maria Fälth Savitski;Toby Mathieson

  • Thermal proteome profiling monitors ligand interactions with cellular membrane proteins

    Friedrich B M Reinhard;Dirk Eberhard;Thilo Werner;Holger Franken

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerard Drewes
Gerard Drewes GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Mikhail M. Savitski
Mikhail M. Savitski European Bioinformatics Institute
Bernhard Kuster
Bernhard Kuster Technical University of Munich
Wolfgang Huber
Wolfgang Huber European Bioinformatics Institute
Rab K. Prinjha
Rab K. Prinjha GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Chun-wa Chung
Chun-wa Chung GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Mark A. Dawson
Mark A. Dawson Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Udo Oppermann
Udo Oppermann University of Oxford
Markus Schirle
Markus Schirle Novartis (Switzerland)
Michael J. Blackman
Michael J. Blackman London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens many doors in healthcare, research, and allied health fields. Prospective students should consider related disciplines and qualifications that can enhance career potential and flexibility.

For a quick route into health sciences, accelerated dietitian programs offer streamlined online coursework, helping you start your career faster. If your interests expand into leadership or hospital administration, pursuing an affordable online MBA healthcare management can be an excellent way to gain advanced business skills relevant to the healthcare sector.

Beyond traditional paths, medical coding is another option for those with a background in biological sciences. Understanding ccs certification helps you choose the right credential for your coding career. If you’re interested in health data and record management, research how to medical coder salary compare, and learn the steps to get started.

Each of these online pathways offers unique advantages, flexible study options, and strong job outlooks—all supportive of a successful career built on your interest in the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus Bantscheff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles