World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
102
Citations
52743
World Ranking
1340
National Ranking
84

Bernhard Kuster publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Kuster sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 475 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bernhard Kuster D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Kuster sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Bernhard Kuster is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a substantial emphasis on molecular biology and spectroscopy. Additional subfields of study include oncology, plant science, and hematology.

Their work covers various specialized topics in proteomics and mass spectrometry. These topics include advanced proteomics techniques and applications, mass spectrometry techniques and applications, ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, protein degradation and inhibitors, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, peptidase inhibition and analysis, and histone deacetylase inhibitors research.

Kuster has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in leading journals such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Journal of Proteome Research, and Blood.

  • Multilevel proteomics reveals host perturbations by SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV (2021, Nature)
  • Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the Arabidopsis proteome (2020, Nature)
  • Robust, reproducible and quantitative analysis of thousands of proteomes by micro-flow LC-MS/MS (2020, Nature Communications)
  • The emerging landscape of single-molecule protein sequencing technologies (2021, Nature Methods)
  • Meltome atlas-thermal proteome stability across the tree of life (2020, Nature Methods)

The profile of frequent coauthors indicates collaboration with several researchers, including Mathias Wilhelm, Matthew The, Julia Mergner, Florian Bayer, and Yun-Chien Chang.

  • Mathias Wilhelm
  • Matthew The
  • Julia Mergner
  • Florian Bayer
  • Yun-Chien Chang

Best Publications

  • Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes

    Anne-Claude Gavin;Markus Bösche;Roland Krause;Paola Grandi

  • Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery

    Anne-Claude Gavin;Patrick Aloy;Paola Grandi;Roland Krause

  • Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review

    Marcus Bantscheff;Markus Schirle;Gavain Sweetman;Jens Rick

  • Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome

    Mathias Wilhelm;Judith Schlegl;Hannes Hahne;Amin Moghaddas Gholami

  • A physical and functional map of the human TNF-alpha/NF-kappa B signal transduction pathway.

    Tewis Bouwmeester;Angela Bauch;Heinz Ruffner;Pierre-Olivier Angrand

  • Tracking cancer drugs in living cells by thermal profiling of the proteome

    Mikhail M. Savitski;Friedrich B. M. Reinhard;Holger Franken;Thilo Werner

  • Quantitative chemical proteomics reveals mechanisms of action of clinical ABL kinase inhibitors

    Marcus Bantscheff;Dirk Eberhard;Yann Abraham;Sonja Bastuck

  • Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present

    Marcus Bantscheff;Simone Lemeer;Mikhail M. Savitski;Bernhard Kuster;Bernhard Kuster

  • Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics

    Parag Mallick;Markus Schirle;Sharon S Chen;Mark R Flory

  • A deep proteome and transcriptome abundance atlas of 29 healthy human tissues

    Dongxue Wang;Basak Eraslan;Basak Eraslan;Thomas Wieland;Björn M. Hallström

  • Cell-cycle-regulated association of RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 with TRF2 and human telomeres.

    X.-D. Zhu;B. Küster;M. Mann;J. H. J. Petrini

  • The target landscape of clinical kinase drugs

    Susan Klaeger;Susan Klaeger;Stephanie Heinzlmeir;Stephanie Heinzlmeir;Mathias Wilhelm;Harald Polzer;Harald Polzer

  • ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins

    Pål Puntervoll;Rune Linding;Christine Gemünd;Sophie Chabanis-Davidson

  • High-fat diet alters gut microbiota physiology in mice

    Hannelore Daniel;Amin Moghaddas Gholami;David Berry;Charles Desmarchelier

  • Multilevel proteomics reveals host perturbations by SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV.

    Alexey Stukalov;Virginie Girault;Vincent Grass;Ozge Karayel

  • Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning.

    Siegfried Gessulat;Tobias Schmidt;Daniel Paul Zolg;Patroklos Samaras

  • 90S Pre-Ribosomes Include the 35S Pre-rRNA, the U3 snoRNP, and 40S Subunit Processing Factors but Predominantly Lack 60S Synthesis Factors

    Paola Grandi;Vladimir Rybin;Jochen Baßler;Elisabeth Petfalski

  • Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective

    Parag Mallick;Bernhard Kuster;Bernhard Kuster

  • Sequencing of N-Linked Oligosaccharides Directly from Protein Gels: In-Gel Deglycosylation Followed by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography☆☆☆

    Bernhard Küster;Susan F. Wheeler;Ann P. Hunter;Raymond A. Dwek

  • Multi-level proteomics reveals host-perturbation strategies of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV

    Alexey Stukalov;Virginie Girault;Vincent Grass;Ozge Karayel

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcus Bantscheff
Marcus Bantscheff GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Matthias Mann
Matthias Mann Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry
Tewis Bouwmeester
Tewis Bouwmeester Novartis (Switzerland)
Mikhail M. Savitski
Mikhail M. Savitski European Bioinformatics Institute
Harald Schwalbe
Harald Schwalbe Goethe University Frankfurt
Gerard Drewes
Gerard Drewes GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Christian Peschel
Christian Peschel Technical University of Munich
Stefan Knapp
Stefan Knapp Goethe University Frankfurt
Claus Schwechheimer
Claus Schwechheimer Technical University of Munich
Dirk Haller
Dirk Haller Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Bernhard Kuster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles