World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen Colagiuri

Stephen Colagiuri

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 16885 15878 565 551 359 40832

Stephen Colagiuri publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen Colagiuri between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen Colagiuri published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2010. 22 of the 378 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2010. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 17 publications
1977 2025

378 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen Colagiuri: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 2
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 6
1993 8
1994 8
1995 6
1996 1
1997 4
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 2
2002 12
2003 12
2004 10
2005 7
2006 3
2007 5
2008 17
2009 15
2010 29
2011 18
2012 17
2013 17
2014 22
2015 13
2016 10
2017 15
2018 15
2019 9
2020 16
2021 19
2022 4
2023 8
2024 5
2025 17
Total 378
Download as CSV

Stephen Colagiuri publications per year - data summary

  • Stephen Colagiuri, a Medicine scholar from University of Sydney, has 378 publications recorded across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1977 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 29 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1977, 1979, 1983, 1987 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 49 years in the span carry no publications at all (1978, 1980 and 1982).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.2 per year counting only the 46 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 53 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1977-1993: 34 publications (2.0 per year); 1994-2010: 139 publications (8.2 per year); 2011-2025: 205 publications (13.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Stephen Colagiuri publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Colagiuri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 359 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 359
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen Colagiuri publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Stephen Colagiuri, a Medicine scholar from University of Sydney, records 359 publications - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Stephen Colagiuri, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Stephen Colagiuri ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Stephen Colagiuri D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Colagiuri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Stephen Colagiuri D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Stephen Colagiuri, a Medicine scholar from University of Sydney, records 80 D-Index - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Stephen Colagiuri, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Stephen Colagiuri ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Stephen Colagiuri is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has a significant body of research in the field of medicine. Their work primarily focuses on endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism, with over fifty publications in this subfield. The scientist's contributions span related areas including physiology, pharmacy, epidemiology, and general health professions.

Their research topics cover various aspects of diabetes management and treatment, obesity and health practices, cardiovascular risks associated with diabetes, diet and metabolism, and intersections with cancer and nutrition education. The diversity of topics reflects a comprehensive approach to metabolic disease and public health.

Frequently published in notable venues, Stephen Colagiuri has contributed multiple papers to Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, with eighteen publications, followed by five papers in Diabetologia and three in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. Other publication venues include SSRN Electronic Journal and Clinical Nutrition.

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, among them Margaret Allman-Farinelli, George Siopis, Natasha Nassar, Crystal Lee, and Alice A. Gibson. These collaborations have contributed to the breadth of research outputs.

Recent publications demonstrate the scope of their work:

  • "Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: a modelling study" (2022) published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • "Global and regional estimates and projections of diabetes-related health expenditure: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition" (2020) published in Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
  • "The association of periodontal disease with the complications of diabetes mellitus. A systematic review" (2020) published in Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
  • "Incorporating fatty liver disease in multidisciplinary care and novel clinical trial designs for patients with metabolic diseases" (2021) published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • "Long-Term Glycemic Variability and Vascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes: Post Hoc Analysis of the FIELD Study" (2020) published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Best Publications

  • Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition.

    Pouya Saeedi;Inga Petersohn;Paraskevi Salpea;Belma Malanda

  • International Expert Committee Report on the Role of the A1C Assay in the Diagnosis of Diabetes

    David M. Nathan;Beverly Balkau;Enzo Bonora;Knut Borch-Johnsen

  • Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis

    Robert Beaglehole;Ruth Bonita;Richard Horton;Cary Adams

  • Low–Glycemic Index Diets in the Management of Diabetes A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Jennie Brand-Miller;Susan Hayne;Peter Petocz;Stephen Colagiuri

  • The Rising Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study

    David W Dunstan;Paul Z Zimmet;Timothy A Welborn;Maximilian Pangratius J De Courten

  • Liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analogue, added to a sulphonylurea over 26 weeks produces greater improvements in glycaemic and weight control compared with adding rosiglitazone or placebo in subjects with Type 2 diabetes (LEAD-1 SU)

    M. Marre;J. Shaw;M. Brändle;W. M W Bebakar

  • Grand challenges in chronic non-communicable diseases

    Abdallah S. Daar;Peter A. Singer;Deepa Leah Persad;Stig K. Pramming

  • Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: A World Health Organization Guideline

    MM Agarwal;M Boulvain;E Coetzee;S Colagiuri

  • Follow-up of Blood-Pressure Lowering and Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes

    Sophia Zoungas;John Chalmers;Bruce Neal;Laurent Billot

  • The metabolic syndrome: useful concept or clinical tool? Report of a WHO Expert Consultation

    R. K. Simmons;K. G. M. M. Alberti;E. A. M. Gale;S. Colagiuri

  • Low-Glycemic Index Foods Improve Long-Term Glycemic Control in NIDDM

    J.C. Brand;S. Colagiuri;S. Crossman;A. Allen

  • Diagnostic Criteria and Classification of Hyperglycaemia First Detected in Pregnancy

    Mukesh M Agarwal;Michel Boulvain;Edward Coetzee;Stephen Colagiuri

  • The cost of overweight and obesity in Australia

    Stephen Colagiuri;Crystal Lee;Ruth Colagiuri;Dianna Josephine Magliano

  • Association of HbA1c levels with vascular complications and death in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence of glycaemic thresholds

    Sophia Zoungas;Sophia Zoungas;J Chalmers;Toshiharu Ninomiya;Qiang Li

  • Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Sally-Anne S Duke;Stephen Colagiuri;Ruth Colagiuri

  • Effect of repaglinide addition to metformin monotherapy on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    R Moses;R Slobodniuk;S Boyages;S Colagiuri

  • AUSDRISK: an Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool based on demographic, lifestyle and simple anthropometric measures.

    Lei Chen;Dianna J Magliano;Beverley Balkau;Beverley Balkau;Stephen Colagiuri

  • Glycemic Thresholds for Diabetes-Specific Retinopathy: Implications for diagnostic criteria for diabetes

    Stephen Colagiuri;Crystal M Y Lee;Tien Yin Wong;Tien Yin Wong;Beverley Balkau

  • Physiological Validation of the Concept of Glycemic Load in Lean Young Adults

    J. C. Brand-Miller;M. Thomas;V. Swan;Z. I. Ahmad

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London
Jonathan E. Shaw
Jonathan E. Shaw Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Jennie Brand-Miller
Jennie Brand-Miller University of Sydney
Michel Marre
Michel Marre Université Paris Cité
Sophia Zoungas
Sophia Zoungas Monash University
Knut Borch-Johnsen
Knut Borch-Johnsen Aarhus University
John Chalmers
John Chalmers University of New South Wales
Paul Zimmet
Paul Zimmet Monash University
Adrian Bauman
Adrian Bauman University of Sydney
Anushka Patel
Anushka Patel University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options is an excellent way to broaden your career prospects in the healthcare field, even if you’re not pursuing a traditional MD. For those interested in healthcare leadership or management, a health administration degree can open doors to hospital administration, policy development, and more.

Nurses seeking career advancement might consider specialized pathways such as rn to np bridge programs. These online degrees enable registered nurses to become nurse practitioners, increasing salary potential and job flexibility.

For those passionate about patient wellness and preventative medicine, an online degree in nutrition offers the skills needed for careers in dietetics, health education, or wellness coaching.

If your goal is senior healthcare management, pursuing a cahme accredited online mha is highly recommended. CAHME accreditation ensures your degree meets high professional standards, preparing you for executive roles in healthcare organizations.

Whether you’re interested in clinical care, nutrition, or administration, these online degree pathways provide flexible options to grow within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Colagiuri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles