World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 128 2648 2470 74 70 1022 92213

John Chalmers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Chalmers between 1960 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Chalmers published across 66 years, from 1960 to 2025, averaging 17.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2016. 61 of the 1,148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2016. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 2 publications 1967: 8 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 8 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 9 publications 1975: 7 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 11 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 23 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 18 publications 1985: 12 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 16 publications 1988: 11 publications 1989: 11 publications 1990: 16 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 21 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 37 publications 2009: 40 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 41 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 43 publications 2015: 35 publications 2016: 61 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 45 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 56 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 23 publications
1960 2025

1,148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Chalmers: publications per year, 1960 to 2025
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 1
1966 2
1967 8
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 8
1972 3
1973 1
1974 9
1975 7
1976 3
1977 3
1978 5
1979 11
1980 5
1981 23
1982 5
1983 5
1984 18
1985 12
1986 10
1987 16
1988 11
1989 11
1990 16
1991 13
1992 16
1993 14
1994 21
1995 15
1996 17
1997 17
1998 7
1999 20
2000 14
2001 14
2002 8
2003 25
2004 22
2005 15
2006 16
2007 13
2008 37
2009 40
2010 39
2011 25
2012 41
2013 37
2014 43
2015 35
2016 61
2017 41
2018 29
2019 45
2020 34
2021 56
2022 30
2023 32
2024 38
2025 23
Total 1,148
Download as CSV

John Chalmers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Chalmers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,021–1,040 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,022 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70 1,022
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John Chalmers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Chalmers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 128–129 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230 128
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Chalmers is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia and has a substantial body of work within the field of medicine, focusing particularly on cardiology, endocrinology, epidemiology, nephrology, and surgery.

Their research extensively covers topics such as blood pressure and hypertension studies, acute ischemic stroke management, diabetes treatment and management, chronic kidney disease and diabetes, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, and intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet
  • Impact of age at type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis on mortality and vascular complications: systematic review and meta-analyses, 2020, Diabetologia
  • Age-stratified and blood-pressure-stratified effects of blood-pressure-lowering pharmacotherapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet
  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, Albuminuria, and Adverse Outcomes, 2023, JAMA
  • Association of anthropometry and weight change with risk of dementia and its major subtypes: A meta-analysis consisting 2.8 million adults with 57 294 cases of dementia, 2020, Obesity Reviews

Chalmers collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Mark Woodward, Craig S. Anderson, Thompson Robinson, Katie Harris, and Anthony Rodgers. These collaborations have contributed to a large number of publications and research in overlapping scientific areas.

Their work is often published in prominent journals, with a significant number of publications appearing in the Journal of Hypertension, followed by Diabetes Care, Stroke, Cerebrovascular Diseases, and Diabetologia.

Overall, Chalmers' research contributions span multiple interconnected medical disciplines, with a marked emphasis on cardiovascular medicine, diabetes, and kidney-related health conditions. Their extensive publication record reflects persistent involvement in meta-analyses and large-scale epidemiological studies addressing critical health issues.

Best Publications

  • Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    Anushka Patel;Stephen MacMahon;John Chalmers

  • 1999 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION-INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

    M. Alderman;K. Arakawa;L. Beilin;J. Chalmers

  • Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack

    S. MacMahon;B. Neal;C. Tzourio;A. Rodgers

  • Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Dena Ettehad;Connor A Emdin;Amit Kiran;Simon G Anderson;Simon G Anderson

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community a statement by the american society of hypertension and the international society of hypertension

    Michael A. Weber;Ernesto L. Schiffrin;William B. White;Samuel Mann

  • Severe Hypoglycemia and Risks of Vascular Events and Death

    Sophia Zoungas;Sophia Zoungas;Anushka Patel;John Chalmers;Bastiaan E. de Galan;Bastiaan E. de Galan

  • Rapid Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Craig S. Anderson;Emma Heeley;Yining Huang;Jiguang Wang

  • Intensive glucose control and macrovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

    Fiona Turnbull;C. Abraira;R. J. Anderson;R. J. Anderson;R. P. Byington

  • Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis

    Caroline S. Fox;Kunihiro Matsushita;Mark Woodward;Mark Woodward;Henk J.G. Bilo

  • Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher albuminuria are associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.: A collaborative meta-analysis of high-risk population cohorts

    Marije van der Velde;Kunihiro Matsushita;Josef Coresh;Brad C. Astor

  • Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide therapy on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease.

    Christophe Tzourio;Craig Anderson;Neil Chapman;Mark Woodward

  • Effects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Min Jun;Celine Foote;Jicheng Lv;Jicheng Lv;Bruce Neal

  • Effects of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials

    F Turnbull;Bruce Neal;Charles Algert;John Chalmers

  • Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial.

    Craig S Anderson;Yining Huang;Ji Guang Wang;Hisatomi Arima;Hisatomi Arima

  • Albuminuria and Kidney Function Independently Predict Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Diabetes

    Toshiharu Ninomiya;Vlado Perkovic;Bastiaan E de Galan;Bastiaan E de Galan;Sophia Zoungas

  • Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

    Fiona Turnbull;B Neal;T. Ninomiya

  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria for prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data.

    Kunihiro Matsushita;Josef Coresh;Yingying Sang;John Chalmers

  • Follow-up of Blood-Pressure Lowering and Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes

    Sophia Zoungas;John Chalmers;Bruce Neal;Laurent Billot

  • Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

    Xinfang Xie;Emily Atkins;Jicheng Lv;Jicheng Lv;Alexander Bennett

  • Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebralhaemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial

    Craig Anderson;Hisatomi Arima;John Chalmers;Emma Heeley

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London
Craig S. Anderson
Craig S. Anderson George Institute for Global Health
Sophia Zoungas
Sophia Zoungas Monash University
Bruce Neal
Bruce Neal George Institute for Global Health
Anushka Patel
Anushka Patel University of New South Wales
Stephen MacMahon
Stephen MacMahon University of Oxford
Jane B Minson
Jane B Minson Flinders University
Paul M. Pilowsky
Paul M. Pilowsky University of Sydney
Michel Marre
Michel Marre Université Paris Cité
Pavel Hamet
Pavel Hamet University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean traditional, on-campus schooling. There are many rn to np programs online that let registered nurses advance their qualifications and become nurse practitioners with flexible study options.

If you’re interested in a broader view of health, a nutrition degree online can open up roles in wellness coaching, dietetics, and public health. This degree suits those passionate about the preventative side of healthcare.

Healthcare management is another fast-growing field. Earning a cahme accredited online mha ensures your training meets national standards, preparing you for leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, or health organizations.

For RNs who want to expand their opportunities without completing clinical hours, there are rn to bsn online without clinicals programs available. These allow working professionals to earn their bachelor’s degree while maintaining a busy schedule.

Online programs make it easier to access education tailored to your goals, whether you're aiming for advanced clinical practice, administration, or wellness fields within the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing John Chalmers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles