World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 68 6458 5857 1960 1626 256 18179

Amy A. Sarjeant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy A. Sarjeant between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy A. Sarjeant published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 28.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 82 publications in 2013. 4 of the 636 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 82. Peak 82 publications in 2013. 2005: 5 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 34 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 70 publications 2012: 42 publications 2013: 82 publications 2014: 75 publications 2015: 49 publications 2016: 54 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

636 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy A. Sarjeant: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 5
2006 24
2007 34
2008 26
2009 32
2010 23
2011 70
2012 42
2013 82
2014 75
2015 49
2016 54
2017 37
2018 9
2019 3
2020 16
2021 14
2022 19
2023 13
2024 5
2025 3
2026 1
Total 636
Download as CSV

Amy A. Sarjeant publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy A. Sarjeant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 256 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100 256
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy A. Sarjeant D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy A. Sarjeant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683 68
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Amy A. Sarjeant is affiliated with Bristol Myers Squibb in the United States. Their research spans several areas within materials science and chemistry, with a notable focus on crystallization and solubility, X-ray diffraction in crystallography, and catalytic reactions.

Their primary fields of study include:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemistry

More specifically, their work delves into subfields such as:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Inorganic Chemistry

The main research topics covered by Amy A. Sarjeant encompass:

  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
  • Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
  • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
  • Crystallography and molecular interactions

Their publication record includes papers in a range of academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • The Journal of Organic Chemistry
  • Organic Letters
  • Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Representative recent publications by Sarjeant include:

  • Photocatalytic Dearomative Intermolecular [2 + 2] Cycloaddition of Heterocycles for Building Molecular Complexity, 2020, The Journal of Organic Chemistry
  • Building a shp: A Rare-Earth Metal-Organic Framework and Its Application in a Catalytic Photooxidation Reaction, 2021, Chemistry of Materials
  • Diboron-Promoted Reduction of Ni(II) Salts: Precatalyst Activation Studies Relevant to Ni-Catalyzed Borylation Reactions, 2021, Organometallics
  • The Discovery of GSK3640254, a Next-Generation Inhibitor of HIV-1 Maturation, 2022, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • High-Throughput Crystallization Screening Technique with Transmission PXRD Analysis, 2023, Organic Process Research & Development

Amy A. Sarjeant has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Bhupinder Sandhu
  • Darpandeep Aulakh
  • Antonio Ramı́rez
  • Arvind Mathur
  • James Kempson

Best Publications

  • Metal-organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: is the sky the limit?

    Omar K. Farha;Ibrahim Eryazici;Nak Cheon Jeong;Nak Cheon Jeong;Brad G. Hauser

  • Vapor-Phase Metalation by Atomic Layer Deposition in a Metal–Organic Framework

    Joseph E. Mondloch;Wojciech Bury;Wojciech Bury;David Fairen-Jimenez;David Fairen-Jimenez;Stephanie Kwon

  • Light-Harvesting Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Efficient Strut-to-Strut Energy Transfer in Bodipy and Porphyrin-Based MOFs

    Chang Yeon Lee;Omar K. Farha;Bong Jin Hong;Amy A. Sarjeant

  • Light-Harvesting and Ultrafast Energy Migration in Porphyrin-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks

    Ho Jin Son;Shengye Jin;Sameer Patwardhan;Sander J. Wezenberg;Sander J. Wezenberg

  • Room-temperature ferroelectricity in supramolecular networks of charge-transfer complexes

    Alok S. Tayi;Alexander K. Shveyd;Andrew C.-H. Sue;Andrew C.-H. Sue;Jodi M. Szarko;Jodi M. Szarko

  • Opening ZIF-8: a catalytically active zeolitic imidazolate framework of sodalite topology with unsubstituted linkers

    Olga Karagiaridi;Marianne B. Lalonde;Wojciech Bury;Wojciech Bury;Amy A. Sarjeant

  • Active-site-accessible, porphyrinic metal-organic framework materials.

    Omar K. Farha;Abraham M. Shultz;Amy A. Sarjeant;SonBinh T. Nguyen

  • Ultrahigh Surface Area Zirconium MOFs and Insights into the Applicability of the BET Theory

    Timothy C. Wang;Wojciech Bury;Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón;Nicolaas A. Vermeulen

  • Kinetic separation of propene and propane in metal-organic frameworks: controlling diffusion rates in plate-shaped crystals via tuning of pore apertures and crystallite aspect ratios.

    Chang Yeon Lee;Youn Sang Bae;Nak Cheon Jeong;Omar K. Farha

  • A coordination chemistry dichotomy for icosahedral carborane-based ligands

    Alexander M. Spokoyny;Charles W. Machan;Daniel J. Clingerman;Mari S. Rosen

  • Post-Synthesis Alkoxide Formation Within Metal−Organic Framework Materials: A Strategy for Incorporating Highly Coordinatively Unsaturated Metal Ions

    Karen L. Mulfort;Omar K. Farha;Charlotte L. Stern;Amy A. Sarjeant

  • Urea Metal–Organic Frameworks as Effective and Size-Selective Hydrogen-Bond Catalysts

    John M. Roberts;Branden M. Fini;Amy A. Sarjeant;Omar K. Farha

  • ExBox: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Scavenger

    Jonathan C. Barnes;Michal Juríček;Nathan L. Strutt;Marco Frasconi

  • Reactions of a copper(II) superoxo complex lead to C-H and O-H substrate oxygenation: modeling copper-monooxygenase C-H hydroxylation.

    Debabrata Maiti;Dong-Heon Lee;Dong-Heon Lee;Katya Gaoutchenova;Christian Würtele

  • Post-Synthesis Modification of a Metal–Organic Framework To Form Metallosalen-Containing MOF Materials

    Abraham M. Shultz;Amy A. Sarjeant;Omar K. Farha;Joseph T. Hupp

  • Gram-scale, high-yield synthesis of a robust metal–organic framework for storing methane and other gases

    Christopher E. Wilmer;Omar K. Farha;Taner Yildirim;Taner Yildirim;Ibrahim Eryazici

  • Designing Higher Surface Area Metal-Organic Frameworks: Are Triple Bonds Better than Phenyls?

    Omar K. Farha;Christopher E. Wilmer;Ibrahim Eryazici;Brad G. Hauser

  • Flexible ferroelectric organic crystals.

    Magdalena Owczarek;Karl A. Hujsak;Daniel P. Ferris;Aleksandrs Prokofjevs

  • Turning on catalysis: incorporation of a hydrogen-bond-donating squaramide moiety into a Zr metal-organic framework.

    C. Michael McGuirk;Michael J. Katz;Charlotte L. Stern;Amy A. Sarjeant

  • Synthesis and characterization of isostructural cadmium zeolitic imidazolate frameworks via solvent-assisted linker exchange

    Olga Karagiaridi;Wojciech Bury;Wojciech Bury;Amy A. Sarjeant;Charlotte L. Stern

Frequent Co-Authors

Omar K. Farha
Omar K. Farha Northwestern University
J. Fraser Stoddart
J. Fraser Stoddart Northwestern University
Joseph T. Hupp
Joseph T. Hupp Northwestern University
Charlotte L. Stern
Charlotte L. Stern Northwestern University
Kenneth D. Karlin
Kenneth D. Karlin Johns Hopkins University
Randall Q. Snurr
Randall Q. Snurr Northwestern University
SonBinh T. Nguyen
SonBinh T. Nguyen Northwestern University
Edward I. Solomon
Edward I. Solomon Stanford University
William A. Goddard
William A. Goddard California Institute of Technology
Chad A. Mirkin
Chad A. Mirkin Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their Chemistry expertise into applied fields, pursuing an online degree in forensic science offers a practical option. Programs such as the forensic degree online blend core chemistry knowledge with criminal investigation techniques, preparing graduates for roles in crime labs and related settings. These affordable degrees help make advanced education accessible to many.

For those seeking a more specialized path, a masters in forensic psychology online can complement chemical analysis skills by providing insight into criminal behavior and psychology. This combination is valuable for careers involving profiling or expert testimony.

The demand for professionals with expertise in both chemistry and forensic applications opens doors to some high paying jobs in forensics. Positions such as forensic chemists and toxicologists require strong scientific backgrounds and offer rewarding career prospects.

When considering these pathways, it’s important to factor in costs. Various criminal justice degree online cost options differ widely, so prospective students should research tuition and fees carefully to find programs that balance affordability and quality.

Best Scientists Citing Amy A. Sarjeant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles